1115 briefs
Supreme Court of India2025

In Re: The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025

2025 INSC 1116; 2025 LiveLaw (Supreme Court) 909; interim order of 15 September 2025

Interim order only. The Court refused to stay the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 as a whole, holding that striking down a statute is reserved for the rarest of cases and that the presumption is always in favour of constitutionality, and finding no prima facie case against the 2025 amendment as a whole. It stayed the operation of S.3(r) insofar as it requires the waqif to prove five years of practising Islam, until the States frame guidelines for such determination, and stayed the proviso to S.3C(2), S.3C(3) and S.3C(4) on separation of powers grounds. It capped non Muslim members at four on the Central Waqf Council and three on State Waqf Boards, directed that titles will not be affected and waqfs not dispossessed until final adjudication, directed that a waqf cannot create third party rights pending adjudication, and extended the time to register waqfs.

muslim-lawwaqfwaqf-amendment-act-2025umeed-actinterim-ordersection-3rsection-3cwaqf-by-user
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2024

Mohd Abdul Samad v State of Telangana

2024 INSC 506; 2024 SCC OnLine Supreme Court 1686; Criminal Appeal No 2842 of 2024; judgment of 10 July 2024

S.125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, now S.144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, applies to all married and divorced women irrespective of their personal law, including Muslim women divorced by pronouncement of triple talaq. The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 is not a special law overriding the general provision; the remedy under the 1986 Act is in addition to and not in derogation of the criminal maintenance remedy, and a divorced Muslim woman may pursue both.

muslim-lawmaintenancesection-125-crpcsection-144-bnss1986-actsecular-remedycumulative-remediesnagarathna
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2024

Sita Soren v Union of India

(2024) 5 Supreme Court Cases 629; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 229; judgment of 4 March 2024

The immunity in Articles 105(2) and 194(2) for anything said or any vote given does not extend to the acceptance of a bribe. The offence is complete on acceptance of the illegal gratification, independently of whether the legislator afterwards speaks or votes as agreed. P V Narasimha Rao v State (1998) overruled.

constitutional-lawprivilegesarticle-105article-194briberyimmunityoverrulingprevention-of-corruption
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2023

Anoop Baranwal v Union of India

(2023) 6 Supreme Court Cases 161; judgment of 2 March 2023

The independence of the Election Commission is essential to free and fair elections, which form part of the basic structure. Exclusive executive control over appointments to the Commission is inconsistent with that independence. Until Parliament legislates, appointments were directed to be made on the advice of a committee of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and the Chief Justice of India.

constitutional-lawarticle-324election-commissionappointmentbasic-structurefree-and-fair-electionsindependenceselection-committee
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2023

Supriyo v Union of India

2023 INSC 920

The Special Marriage Act as presently enacted is confined to marriages between a male and a female; legal recognition of same-sex marriages requires legislative action and cannot be read into the SMA by judicial interpretation.

special-marriage-actsame-sex-marriagequeer-rightslegislative-actionarticle-21article-14
Read case brief
2023

Vineeth Kumar v State of Kerala

2023 SCC OnLine Kerala 4024

Right to internet access is part of the right to education and right to privacy under Article 21; blanket internet shutdowns must satisfy proportionality test.

it-lawinternet-accessarticle-21privacyinternet-shutdown
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2022

Arunachala Gounder (Dead) by LRs v Ponnusamy

(2022) 7 Supreme Court Cases 554

A Hindu female's self-acquired property or property obtained under a will or gift or by any other mode devolves by intestate succession under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and not by survivorship; daughters inherit equally with sons from a female Hindu's self-acquired property.

successionself-acquired-propertyfemale-hindudaughters-rightssection-15section-16
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2022

Bhiben Patel v State of Gujarat

2022 SCC OnLine Gujarat 3254

Constitutional validity of GST provisions; State's power to levy tax on goods and services post-101st Amendment.

taxation-lawgstconstitutional-validity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2022

Mohit Minerals Pvt Ltd v. Union of India

(2022) 2 Supreme Court Cases 1

GST Council recommendations are not binding on Parliament/State Legislatures but have persuasive value; IGST on ocean freight in CIF imports amounts to double taxation.

taxationGSTcooperative-federalismGST-councilIGSTocean-freightdouble-taxation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2022

Safeway World Trade v Union of India

2022 SCC OnLine Supreme Court 1047

Validity of retrospective amendments in GST law; procedural conditions in ITC cannot override substantive right.

taxation-lawitcretrospective-amendmentgstsubstantive-right
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2022

Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI

(2022) 10 Supreme Court Cases 51

Graded system for bail based on offence severity. Courts must adopt bail-friendly approach per Art. 21. Investigation convenience cannot justify indefinite detention.

bailgraded-systemarrestarticle-21guidelinesS.479-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2022

Tvl. Vardhan v State Tax Officer

2022 SCC OnLine Madras 15452

Procedural defects in GST show-cause notices (SCN) vitiate the proceedings; principles of natural justice must be complied with.

taxation-lawgstshow-cause-noticenatural-justiceprocedural-defect
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2022

Union of India v Mohit Minerals Pvt Ltd

(2022) 10 Supreme Court Cases 700; judgment of 19 May 2022

Article 246A confers simultaneous legislative power on the Union and the States over goods and services tax. The Goods and Services Tax Council under Article 279A is a deliberative body whose recommendations have persuasive value only and are not binding on the Union or the States.

constitutional-lawarticle-246aarticle-279agst-councilcooperative-federalismfiscal-federalismsimultaneous-powerfinancial-relations
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2021

Rajnesh v. Neha

(2021) 2 Supreme Court Cases 324

Comprehensive guidelines for maintenance proceedings: overlapping claims must be adjusted, income affidavit mandatory, interim maintenance within specified time, children's needs assessed separately.

maintenanceguidelinesincome-affidavitinterimS.144-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court2021

Safiya Sultana v State of UP

2021 SCC OnLine All 655

S.125 CrPC (now S.144 BNSS) is a secular remedy available to a Muslim wife irrespective of a pending personal law proceeding; the two are concurrent and there is no bar on cumulation.

muslim-lawmaintenancesection-125-crpcsection-144-bnsscumulationsecular-remedy
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2021

Vidya Drolia v Durga Trading Corporation

(2021) 2 Supreme Court Cases 1

Four-fold test for non-arbitrability; at S.8/S.11 stage, court applies prima facie test; detailed validity examination left to tribunal

ADRnon-arbitrabilityprima-facie-testsection-8landmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2021

Vikas Kishanrao Gawali v State of Maharashtra

(2021) 6 Supreme Court Cases 73

Reservation of seats for backward classes in local bodies must satisfy a triple test: a dedicated Commission must conduct a contemporaneous empirical inquiry, the State must specify the proportion in the light of its recommendations, and the aggregate reservation with Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes must not exceed fifty per cent.

constitutional-lawarticle-243darticle-243ttriple-testreservationbackward-classeslocal-self-governmentempirical-inquiry
Read case brief
2020

Amway India v 1MG Technologies

2020 SCC OnLine Delhi 1839

E-commerce platforms have a duty to prevent unauthorized sale of trademarked products; intermediary immunity under S.79 does not extend to active participation in infringement.

it-lawe-commerceintermediarytrademark-infringementsection-79
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2020

Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India v Subhash Chandra Agarwal

(2020) 5 Supreme Court Cases 481; judgment of 13 November 2019

The office of the Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005 and is not a separate authority from the Supreme Court. Judicial independence is not a shield against accountability, though disclosure must be tested against the statutory exemptions applying a public interest balancing test.

constitutional-lawjudicial-accountabilityright-to-informationtransparencyjudicial-independencecollegiumpublic-interestasset-declaration
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2020

Ferid Allani v. Union of India

2020 Supreme Court Cases OnLine Delhi 835

Computer-related inventions are patentable if they demonstrate a "technical effect" or "technical contribution" beyond the mere program itself; Section 3(k) excludes only computer programs "per se

patentcomputer-related-inventionsection-3ktechnical-effectsoftware-patent
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2020

Indore Development Authority v Manoharlal

(2020) 8 Supreme Court Cases 129

Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 (LARR Act) requires both conditions (no compensation paid and no physical possession taken) to be satisfied for deemed lapse of old acquisitions

LARR-Actdeemed-lapseland-acquisitionSection-24compensationpossession
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2020

Keisham Meghachandra Singh v Hon'ble Speaker, Manipur Legislative Assembly

(2021) 16 Supreme Court Cases 503; judgment of 21 January 2020

A disqualification petition under the Tenth Schedule must be decided by the Speaker within a reasonable period, which absent exceptional circumstances is about three months. The Court also questioned whether the Speaker, being a member of a political party, is the appropriate authority to adjudicate such petitions.

constitutional-lawanti-defectiontenth-schedulespeakerreasonable-periodthree-monthsindependent-tribunaldelay
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2020

Rojer Mathew v South Indian Bank Ltd

(2020) 6 Supreme Court Cases 1

Whether a Bill answers the definition of a Money Bill in Article 110 is a question of constitutional interpretation, and the finality of the Speaker's certificate is not settled. The question was referred to a larger Bench, doubting Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui. Rules restructuring tribunals were struck down for excessive delegation.

constitutional-lawmoney-billarticle-110tribunalsexcessive-delegationfinance-act-2017judicial-review
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2020

Vidya Devi v State of Himachal Pradesh

(2020) 2 Supreme Court Cases 569

For Section 24(2) of the LARR Act 2013 to apply, the landowner must establish that physical possession was not taken and compensation was not paid; the burden is on the landowner

LARR-ActSection-24deemed-lapsepossessioncompensationland-acquisition
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2020

Vijay Karia v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL

(2020) 11 Supreme Court Cases 1

For foreign awards under S.48, 'public policy' is narrower than for domestic awards; patent illegality is NOT a ground; Indian courts must adopt pro-enforcement approach

ADRsection-48foreign-awardspublic-policypro-enforcementNew-York-Conventionlandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2020

Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma

(2020) 9 Supreme Court Cases 1

Daughters have coparcenary rights by birth in the Hindu Undivided Family, equal to sons, under the substituted Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act 1956 (as amended in 2005), irrespective of whether the father coparcener was alive on the date of the 2005 amendment.

coparcenarydaughters-rightsection-6hindu-succession-actretroactive
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2019

Mohammed Salim (dead) through LRs v Shamsudeen (dead) through LRs

(2019) 4 Supreme Court Cases 130; judgment of 22 January 2019

A marriage between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman is neither valid nor void but irregular (fasid) under Muhammadan law. An irregular marriage subsists until terminated in accordance with law, so the child born of such a marriage is legitimate exactly as the child of a valid marriage is, and is entitled to claim a share in the father's property. The wife in such a marriage is entitled to her dower but does not inherit from the husband.

muslim-lawirregular-marriagefasidbatillegitimacyinheritanceinterfaith-marriage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2019

Monsanto Technology LLC v. Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd.

(2019) 3 Supreme Court Cases 381

The question of whether patents on transgenic plant varieties and seeds are excluded under Section 3(j) requires trial; patent rights cannot be negated at interlocutory stage

patentplantsseedssection-3jBt-cottonbiotechnologyPPVFR-Act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2019

Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v HSCC (India) Ltd.

(2020) 20 Supreme Court Cases 760

Unilateral appointment clauses where one party alone appoints the sole arbitrator are invalid; violates equality between parties in arbitral process

ADRunilateral-appointmentsection-12party-equalityPSU-contractslandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2019

Surinder Singh Deswal v. Virender Gandhi

(2019) 11 Supreme Court Cases 341

S.148 NI Act (deposit for appeal) is procedural and applies retrospectively to all appeals filed after the 2018 Amendment

NI-Act2018-amendmentS148retrospectiveappealdepositprocedural-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2019

Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd v Union of India

(2019) 4 Supreme Court Cases 17

IBC is constitutionally valid; distinction between financial and operational creditors is rational; financial creditor dominance in CoC is justified

IBCconstitutional-validityfinancial-creditoroperational-creditorCoCinsolvency
Read case brief
2019

Tips Industries Ltd v Wynk Music Ltd

2019 SCC OnLine Bombay 1475

A statutory license under S.31D of the Copyright Act does not cover internet/online streaming; streaming services need direct licenses from copyright owners.

it-lawstatutory-licensestreamingcopyrightsection-31d
Read case brief
2018

Ajay Bharadwaj v State

2018 SCC OnLine Delhi 8502

Sending offensive messages through electronic communication constitutes an offence under S.66A IT Act (struck down) and S.354D IPC; cyber-stalking is a cognizable offence.

it-lawcyber-stalkingoffensive-messagessection-66a
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2018

Brijesh Kumari v Union of India

(2018) Unreported; Delhi HC / SC directions on Family Court representation

The bar on legal representation in Family Courts under S.13 is not absolute; court must grant permission liberally where a party would be substantially prejudiced without representation

ADRfamily-courtslegal-representationsection-13
Read case brief
2018

Christian Louboutin v Nakul Bajaj

253 (2018) Delhi Law Times 728

An e-commerce platform that actively promotes counterfeit goods loses intermediary safe harbour under S.79; distinction between active and passive intermediary.

it-lawintermediaryactive-vs-passivee-commercecounterfeit
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2018

Danamma @ Suman Surpur v Amar

(2018) 3 Supreme Court Cases 343

Daughters are entitled to a share as coparceners in ancestral property under the amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act even where a partition suit was filed before the 2005 amendment came into force, so long as the partition had not been finally effected by a registered instrument or final decree before that date.

coparcenarydaughters-rightsection-6hindu-succession-actpending-partition-suit
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2018

HRD Corporation v GAIL (India) Limited

(2018) 12 Supreme Court Cases 471

Expiry of limitation for underlying claim does not terminate the arbitrator's mandate; time-bar is for the tribunal to decide on merits under Kompetenz-Kompetenz

ADRsection-14limitationmandatekompetenz-kompetenz
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (Five-Judge Constitution Bench)2018

Indian Young Lawyers Association and Ors. v State of Kerala and Ors. (Sabarimala Temple case)

(2019) 11 Supreme Court Cases 1

The exclusion of women in the 10 to 50 age group from entering the Sabarimala temple violates Articles 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 25(1); the practice is not an essential religious practice protected under Article 25, and a public place of worship cannot exclude women based on physiological characteristics.

article-25essential-religious-practicegender-equalitysabarimalafreedom-of-religion
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2018

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Delhi Air Pollution Case)

(2018) Supreme Court Cases OnLine SC (continuing proceedings)

Sustained judicial oversight, applying a continuing mandamus approach, is necessary to ensure genuine, effective implementation of established regulatory frameworks, beyond their mere formal establishment.

air-pollutiongrapcontinuing-mandamusdelhi
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2018

Sampurna Behura v. Union of India

(2018) 4 Supreme Court Cases 433

The JJ Act 2015 mandates that no juvenile shall be kept in a jail or police lockup at any stage. Child-friendly approach must permeate all interactions with juveniles in conflict with law. Compliance with institutional care standards is mandatory, not aspirational.

juvenile-justiceprotectioninstitutional-carechild-friendlyJJ-Act-2015sem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2018

Shafin Jahan v Asokan K.M.

(2018) 16 Supreme Court Cases 368

The right to marry a person of one's choice is integral to the fundamental right to life and personal liberty under Article 21; courts cannot annul a marriage between consenting adults on the ground of interference by parents or third parties, and habeas corpus proceedings cannot be used to override an adult's choice of spouse.

right-to-marryarticle-21choice-of-partnerhabeas-corpushadiya-case
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2018

Supreme Court Bar Association v Union of India

(2018) 5 Supreme Court Cases 388 (or connected matter concerning RTI applicability to constitutional offices)

The Right to Information Act, 2005 must be interpreted to balance the citizen's right to information against legitimate concerns of confidentiality and the efficient functioning of public institutions, including judicial and quasi-judicial bodies; disclosure obligations under the Act extend to constitutional and public authorities, subject to the specific exemptions carved out under the statute itself.

right-to-informationrti-actdisclosure-obligationsexemptions
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2017

Amardeep Singh v Harveen Kaur

(2017) 8 Supreme Court Cases 746

The six-month cooling-off period under S.13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act for divorce by mutual consent is not mandatory; the court may waive or reduce it in appropriate cases where the marriage has irretrievably broken down and the waiting period would serve no purpose.

divorcemutual-consentcooling-periodsection-13Birretrievable-breakdownwaiver
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2017

CIT v Balbir Singh Maini

(2017) 8 Supreme Court Cases 522

A 'Joint Development Agreement' does not amount to 'transfer' under S.2(47) unless possession is handed over under S.53A of the TPA.

taxation-lawcapital-gainstransferjoint-development-agreement
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2017

KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India

(2017) 10 Supreme Court Cases 1

Right to privacy is a fundamental right under Art.21; any interference must satisfy triple test of legality, legitimate aim, and proportionality

IT-lawprivacyArt-21fundamental-rightdata-protectionPuttaswamylandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2017

Manish Jain v Akanksha Jain

(2017) 15 Supreme Court Cases 801

In determining maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the financial capacity, income, and status of the husband, along with the reasonable needs of the wife, must be considered; the wife's own independent income, if any, does not automatically disentitle her to interim maintenance.

maintenance-pendente-litesection-24-hmainterim-maintenancewifes-income
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2017

Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat

(2017) 9 Supreme Court Cases 641

Inherent powers under S.482 (now S.528 BNSS) can be exercised to quash even non-compoundable offences if the dispute is essentially private and parties have settled.

quashingsettlementnon-compoundableinherent-powersS.528-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (five Judge Constitution Bench)2017

Shayara Bano v Union of India

(2017) 9 Supreme Court Cases 1; All India Reporter 2017 Supreme Court 4609; judgment of 22 August 2017

Talaq-e-biddat, instantaneous and irrevocable triple talaq, is set aside. Nariman and Lalit JJ held it manifestly arbitrary and violative of Art.14, and struck down S.2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act 1937 to the extent it recognised the practice, that section being law in force within Art.13(1). Kurian Joseph J held the practice contrary to the basic tenets of the Quran and therefore in violation of Shariat itself. Only two of the five Judges held the 1937 Act unconstitutional in part.

muslim-lawtriple-talaqtalaq-e-biddatarticle-14article-13article-25shariat-act-1937manifest-arbitrariness
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2017

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Nirmala Devi

(2017) 12 Supreme Court Cases 127

Probation and parole are reformative measures meant to rehabilitate offenders. Courts should liberally grant probation to first-time offenders convicted of lesser offences, particularly women and young offenders, keeping in view the nature of offence, character of offender, and circumstances.

probationparolereformationsentencingfirst-offendersem-5
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2017

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd v Myspace Inc

2017 SCC OnLine Delhi 7810

Copyright owners can seek injunction against platforms hosting infringing content; S.79 safe harbour does not protect platforms with actual knowledge of infringement.

it-lawcopyrightintermediaryinjunctionsafe-harbouractual-knowledge
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2016

Jindal Stainless Ltd v State of Haryana

(2017) 12 Supreme Court Cases 1; judgment of 11 November 2016

The concept of compensatory tax has no basis in the Constitution and is discarded. A tax simpliciter is not a restriction on the freedom guaranteed by Article 301. The enquiry in the case of a State tax is whether it discriminates between imported goods and similar goods produced within the State under Article 304(a).

constitutional-lawarticle-301article-304compensatory-taxentry-taxdiscriminationinterstate-tradepart-xiii
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2016

Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix v Deputy Speaker, Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly

(2016) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1

Article 163(1) confers no general discretionary power on the Governor. His discretion is confined to functions which the Constitution expressly requires him to exercise in his discretion, or which arise by necessary implication. Summoning, proroguing and dissolving the House under Article 174 must be done on ministerial advice.

constitutional-lawarticle-163article-174article-175governordiscretionstatus-quo-antejudicial-review
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2016

Prakash v Phulavati

(2016) 2 Supreme Court Cases 36

The rights conferred on daughters as coparceners under the 2005 amendment to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act are prospective; a daughter can claim coparcenary rights only if both the daughter and her father coparcener were alive on the date the amendment came into force, 9 September 2005. This position was later disapproved in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma (2020).

coparcenarydaughters-rightsection-6hindu-succession-actprospectiveoverruled
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2015

ABC v State (NCT of Delhi)

(2015) 10 Supreme Court Cases 1

An unwed Christian mother can apply to be appointed the sole natural guardian of her child without notice to the putative father, since the welfare of the child is paramount and the father's role in such circumstances is often peripheral; the Court extended similar reasoning across personal law contexts for unwed mothers.

unwed-mothernatural-guardianwelfare-of-childnotice-to-father
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2015

Babulal v. Ramlal

AIR 2015 Supreme Court 3467

20+ years of open, peaceful use as of right establishes a prescriptive easement that cannot be unilaterally extinguished

property-laweasementssection-15prescriptionright-of-way
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2015

F. Hoffmann-La Roche v. Cipla Ltd.

FAO (OS) 188/2009, Delhi High Court

Public interest in access to life-saving drugs may limit patent injunction; damages can be adequate alternative remedy

patentsinfringementinjunctionpublic-interestpharmaceuticalaccess-to-medicines
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2015

Kailash Nath Associates v Delhi Development Authority

(2015) 4 Supreme Court Cases 136

Forfeiture of earnest money under Section 74 is permissible only where the forfeiting party proves loss, or where the amount is a genuine pre-estimate of damage; unconscionable forfeiture without proof of loss is not sustainable.

section-74earnest-moneyforfeitureliquidated-damagesDDA
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2015

Priyanka Srivastava v. State of U.P.

(2015) 6 Supreme Court Cases 287

Before a Magistrate takes cognizance on a private complaint, he must apply judicial mind and may direct preliminary inquiry to verify the truthfulness of allegations. Courts must prevent abuse of criminal process through frivolous complaints.

complaintcognizanceabuse-of-processpreliminary-inquiryS.223-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2015

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India

(2015) 5 Supreme Court Cases 1

S.66A IT Act unconstitutional (vague, overbroad, violates Art.19(1)(a)); S.79 intermediary liability triggered only by court order or government notification, not private complaint.

IT-lawS66AArt-19freedom-of-speechintermediary-liabilitylandmark
Read case brief
Patna High Court2015

Sudha Kumari v State of Bihar

(2015) 4 PLJR 283

Legal aid is a fundamental right under Article 21; an advocate providing legal aid must maintain the same standard of diligence as in a paid brief.

professional-ethicslegal-aidarticle-21duty-to-public
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2015

Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v Union of India (Fourth Judges case, National Judicial Appointments Commission)

(2016) 5 Supreme Court Cases 1; judgment of 16 October 2015

Primacy of the judiciary in the appointment of Judges is an element of the independence of the judiciary, which is part of the basic structure. The Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 and the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 were struck down, and the collegium revived.

constitutional-lawnjacarticle-124aarticle-368basic-structurejudicial-independencecollegiumfourth-judges-case
Read case brief
2014

Alice Corp v CLS Bank International

573 U.S. 208 (2014)

Abstract ideas implemented on a generic computer are not patent-eligible; mere computerization of a conventional business method does not make it patentable (US Supreme Court).

it-lawsoftware-patentabstract-ideapatent-eligibilityus-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2014

Anvar PV v. PK Basheer

(2014) 10 Supreme Court Cases 473

S.65B(4) certificate is mandatory for admission of secondary electronic evidence; oral evidence cannot substitute for the statutory certificate

IT-lawelectronic-evidenceS65BcertificateadmissibilityBSA-S58landmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2014

Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar

(2014) 8 Supreme Court Cases 273

Police must not automatically arrest in cognizable offences punishable with up to 7 years. Conditions under S.41(1)(b) CrPC (now S.35(3) BNSS) must be satisfied and reasons recorded.

arrestpolice-powerarticle-21S.35-BNSSguidelinessem-5
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2014

Bayer Corporation v. Union of India

W.P.(C) 1323/2013, Delhi High Court (2014)

Compulsory licence under S.84 upheld on appeal; IPAB and Controller's order granting CL to Natco affirmed

patentcompulsory-licenceappealsection-84sorafenib
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2014

Lalita Kumari v. State of UP

(2014) 2 Supreme Court Cases 1

Registration of FIR is mandatory under S.154 CrPC (now S.173 BNSS) when information discloses a cognizable offence. Preliminary inquiry (max 7 days) permissible only where cognizability is unclear.

FIRmandatory-registrationcognizablepolice-dutyS.173-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2014

Madras Bar Association v Union of India

(2014) 10 Supreme Court Cases 1

Tribunals must have judicial members with qualifications comparable to HC judges for deciding questions of law; technical members cannot decide pure legal questions alone

ADRtribunalsNCLTjudicial-independencecomposition
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2014

Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui v State of Uttar Pradesh

(2014) 11 Supreme Court Cases 415

The Speaker's certificate that a Bill is a Money Bill is final and conclusive, and the validity of legislative proceedings cannot be questioned on the ground of an irregularity of procedure. The correctness of the certification is therefore not open to judicial review.

constitutional-lawmoney-billarticle-110article-199article-212speakers-certificatenon-justiciability
Read case brief
2014

Nirma Industries v Computer Sciences Corp

2014 SCC OnLine Delhi 3484

Disputes arising from IT service agreements are subject to arbitration where the agreement contains an arbitration clause; the scope of arbitrability extends to software disputes.

it-lawarbitrationit-servicessoftware-dispute
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2014

Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India

(2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 1

Inordinate delay in disposal of mercy petition violates Art. 21 and constitutes ground for commutation of death sentence to life imprisonment.

death-penaltymercy-petitiondelaycommutationarticle-21S.472-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2014

Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v Progetto Grano Spa

(2014) 2 Supreme Court Cases 433

For enforcement of foreign awards under S.48, 'public policy' does not include 'patent illegality'; scope is narrower than S.34 for domestic awards

ADRsection-48foreign-awardspublic-policyno-patent-illegalityNew-York-Convention
Read case brief
2014

State v Mehdi Masroor Biswas

FIR No. 01/2015, NIA Special Court, Bengaluru

Operating social media accounts to propagate terrorist ideology and recruit for terrorist organizations constitutes cyber-terrorism under S.66F of the IT Act.

it-lawcyber-terrorismsocial-mediasection-66frecruitment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2014

Subramanian Swamy v Director, CBI

(2014) 8 Supreme Court Cases 682

Access to justice cannot be blocked by procedural requirements protecting corrupt officials; reinforced need for independent anti-corruption mechanisms

ADRlokpalanti-corruptionsanctionaccess-to-justice
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2014

Subramanian Swamy v. Raju

(2014) 8 Supreme Court Cases 390

JJ Act 2000's uniform 18-year threshold for juvenility is constitutionally valid. Legislature has prerogative to fix age of criminal responsibility based on scientific evidence and international obligations.

juvenile-justiceage-thresholdconstitutional-validitynirbhayaarticle-14sem-5
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2014

V.K. Industries v. HCL Ltd.

2014 (60) PTC 290 (Del)

In process patent infringement cases, Section 104A reverses the burden of proof onto the defendant to show that the process used is different from the patented process

patentinfringementprocess-patentburden-of-proofsection-104A
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2013

Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan v State of Maharashtra and Ors.

(2013) 4 Supreme Court Cases 465

The right to a fair hearing includes the right to cross-examine witnesses whose statements are relied upon against a party; where a party is denied a genuine opportunity to test evidence through cross-examination, and that evidence is nonetheless relied upon to the party's detriment, the resulting decision is vitiated for breach of natural justice and the principles of a fair hearing.

fair-hearingcross-examinationnatural-justiceright-to-be-heard
Read case brief
Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB)2013

Bayer Corporation v. Natco Pharma Ltd.

ORA/35/2012/PT/MUM, IPAB Order dated 4 March 2013

IPAB upheld India's first compulsory licence; affordability and local working are valid grounds under S.84; reduced royalty from 6% to 7%

patentcompulsory-licencesection-84TRIPSaccess-to-medicinesIPAB
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2013

Centre for Environmental Law, WWF-I v. Union of India

(2013) 8 Supreme Court Cases 234

Courts continue to engage with specific wildlife conservation implementation and strategy questions beyond the Wildlife Protection Act's foundational statutory framework alone.

wildlife-protectionhabitat-protectionendangered-species
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2013

Indra Sarma v V.K.V. Sarma

(2013) 15 Supreme Court Cases 755

Not every live-in relationship qualifies as a 'relationship in the nature of marriage' under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005; the Court laid down guiding criteria to determine when a live-in relationship attracts the protections of the Act, and held a relationship with a man who was already married does not qualify.

live-in-relationshipdomestic-violence-actrelationship-in-nature-of-marriagepalimony
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2013

K. Srinivas Rao v D.A. Deepa

(2013) 5 Supreme Court Cases 226

Courts must explore mediation/conciliation in matrimonial disputes before granting divorce; Family Courts should actively refer to mediation centres

ADRmediationfamily-courtsmatrimonialreconciliation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2013

Novartis AG v. Union of India

(2013) 6 Supreme Court Cases 1

S.3(d): 'efficacy' means therapeutic efficacy for pharmaceuticals; new form of known substance must show significantly enhanced therapeutic efficacy to be patentable

patentsS3devergreeningpharmaceuticalTRIPSpublic-health
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2013

Salil Bali v. Union of India

(2013) 7 Supreme Court Cases 705

Age of 18 as juvenility threshold is based on scientific understanding of adolescent brain development and UNCRC; not arbitrary under Art. 14.

juvenile-justiceage-thresholdbrain-developmentarticle-14UNCRCsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2013

Sunil Mehta v. State of Gujarat

(2013) 12 Supreme Court Cases 220

Trial before Court of Session requires compliance with procedural safeguards including proper framing of charge, recording of evidence in presence of accused, and opportunity for cross-examination. Non-compliance with these fundamental requirements vitiates the trial.

sessions-trialprocedural-safeguardsfair-trialcharge-framingsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2012

Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan

(2012) 12 Supreme Court Cases 406

Jurisdiction of criminal courts is determined by the place where the offence is committed or where its consequences ensue, not merely by the residence of the accused or complainant.

jurisdictionplace-of-trialS.211-BNSSterritorial-jurisdictionsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2012

Lavesh v. State of Haryana

(2012) 5 Supreme Court Cases 792

Proclamation and attachment under S.82/83 CrPC (now S.84/85 BNSS) require strict compliance with prescribed procedure. Attachment without valid proclamation or before expiry of the stipulated time is illegal.

proclamationattachmentabsconding-accusedS.84-BNSSS.85-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2012

Mohd. Hussain v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

(2012) 9 Supreme Court Cases 408

The role of the prosecutor is to act as an officer of the court and assist in administration of justice, not merely to secure a conviction. A fair trial requires the prosecutor to be fair to the accused and place all material evidence before the court, including that which favours the defence.

prosecutorfair-trialduty-of-prosecutorofficer-of-courtsem-5
Read case brief
Controller of Patents, Mumbai2012

Natco Pharma Ltd. v. Bayer Corporation

Compulsory Licence Application No. 1/2011, Controller of Patents (2012)

India's first compulsory licence was granted under Section 84 where the patented drug was not available at a reasonably affordable price and the patent was not worked in India

patentcompulsory-licencesection-84pharmaceuticalpublic-healthTRIPS
Read case brief
International Criminal Court (Trial Chamber I)2012

Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo

ICC-01/04-01/06 (2012)

Conscripting and enlisting children under 15 and using them in hostilities is a war crime under Article 8(2)(e)(vii) of the Rome Statute; first ICC conviction

ICCrome-statutechild-soldierswar-crimesindividual-criminal-responsibilityfirst-conviction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2012

Sanjay Chandra v. CBI

(2012) 1 Supreme Court Cases 40

Bail is the rule, jail the exception. In non-bailable offences, relevant factors are nature of accusation, severity of punishment, flight risk, and prima facie case.

bailnon-bailablepersonal-libertyarticle-21sem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2012

Sanjeev Kumar Jain v. Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust

(2012) 1 Supreme Court Cases 455

Compensatory costs under Section 35A CPC are available only where a claim or defence is proved to be false and the party knew it was false at the time of making it. Mere failure of a claim is not enough to attract compensatory costs.

CPCcompensatory-costssection-35Afalse-claimknowledge-of-falsity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2011

CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay

(2011) 8 Supreme Court Cases 497

Evaluated answer sheets are 'information' under RTI Act S.2(f) and can be disclosed; but RTI should not be used to paralyze administration

administrative-lawRTIanswer-sheetsinformationS-2flimits-of-RTI
Read case brief
Andhra Pradesh High Court2011

GVK Industries v. ITO

(2011) 332 Income Tax Reports 130 (AP)

Retrospective tax legislation must satisfy the test of reasonableness under Art.14 and Art.265; confiscatory or impossible-compliance retrospective taxation may be struck down.

taxationconstitutional-lawarticle-265retrospective-taxationreasonableness
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2011

Kalyan Kumar Gogoi v. Ashutosh Agnihotri

(2011) 2 SCC 532

Oral evidence is inadmissible to prove the contents of a document when the document exists and is available; contents must be proved by the document itself.

evidence-lawdocumentary-evidenceoral-evidencebest-evidence-rulesection-91
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2011

KT Plantation Pvt Ltd v State of Karnataka

(2011) 9 Supreme Court Cases 1

After the 44th Amendment, the right to property is a constitutional right under Article 300A requiring authority of law for deprivation; eminent domain power must satisfy the test of public purpose and fair compensation

eminent-domainright-to-propertyArticle-300A44th-Amendmentcompensationpublic-purpose
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2011

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra

(2011) 1 Supreme Court Cases 694

Acquittal carries double presumption of innocence. Appellate court can reverse only if trial court's view is perverse, impossible, or ignores material evidence.

appealacquittaldouble-presumptionperversitystandard-of-reviewsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2010

B P Singhal v Union of India

(2010) 6 Supreme Court Cases 331

The doctrine of pleasure in Article 156(1) is not subject to any limitations and requires no reasons, but the power cannot be exercised arbitrarily, capriciously or for irrelevant or extraneous reasons. A change of government at the Centre is not by itself a ground for removing a Governor.

constitutional-lawarticle-155article-156governordoctrine-of-pleasureremovalarbitrarinessjudicial-review
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2010

Banyan Tree Holding v. A. Murali Krishna Reddy

2010 (42) PTC 361 (Del)

Mere accessibility of a website does not confer jurisdiction; court must apply 'purposeful availment' or 'targeting' test for internet jurisdiction

IT-lawjurisdictiontargeting-testinternettrademarkpurposeful-availmentlandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2010

D. Velusamy v D. Patchaiammal

(2010) 10 Supreme Court Cases 469

To constitute a 'relationship in the nature of marriage' entitling a woman to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC (via the Domestic Violence Act framework), the couple must hold themselves out to society as spouses, be of legal age to marry, be otherwise qualified to marry, have voluntarily cohabited, and have lived together for a significant period.

live-in-relationshipdomestic-violence-actrelationship-in-nature-of-marriagemaintenance
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2010

K Krishna Murthy v Union of India

(2010) 7 Supreme Court Cases 202

Articles 243D(6) and 243T(6) are enabling provisions: reservation for backward classes in local bodies is permitted but not constitutionally compelled. Political reservation requires a separate and rigorous empirical inquiry, and the aggregate of reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and backward classes should not exceed fifty per cent of the total seats.

constitutional-lawarticle-243darticle-243treservationbackward-classeslocal-self-governmentfifty-per-cent-ceilingpolitical-reservation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2010

Ram Jethmalani v. Bar Council of India

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 295 of 2009

AIBE is a valid exercise of BCI's rule-making power under S.7(1)(h) and S.49(1)(af). It does not violate Art. 19(1)(g) as it ensures minimum competence in public interest.

professional-ethicsAIBEbar-examinationBCIarticle-19
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2010

S Kaladevi v VR Somasundaram

(2010) 5 Supreme Court Cases 518

Possession taken in pursuance of contract is mandatory for S.53A; without possession, section has no application

property-lawpart-performancesection-53Apossessionmandatory
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2010

Selvi and Ors. v State of Karnataka

(2010) 7 Supreme Court Cases 263

Involuntary administration of polygraph, narco-analysis, and brain electrical activation profile tests violates Art.20(3) (protection against self-incrimination) and Art.21 (personal liberty and mental privacy); such tests can only be conducted with free, informed, and voluntary consent.

article-20-3self-incriminationnarco-analysispolygraphmental-privacyarticle-21
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2010

State of Gujarat v. Umiyaben

(2010) 8 Supreme Court Cases 300

Order XIV Rule 5 gives the court wide power to frame additional issues at any stage before judgment if necessary to determine the real controversy between the parties. This power should be exercised in the interest of justice.

CPCframing-of-issuesorder-XIV-rule-5additional-issuesreal-controversyjudicial-discretion
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2010

Vinod Seth v. Devinder Bajaj

(2010) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1

Courts must award actual costs reflecting the true expense of litigation. The practice of awarding nominal or token costs (regardless of actual expense) should be abandoned. Costs should approximate real legal expenses incurred.

CPCcostssection-35actual-costsrealistic-costsnominal-costs-deprecated
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2009

Abdul Rahim v Sk Abdul Zabar

(2009) 6 Supreme Court Cases 160; All India Reporter 2010 Supreme Court 211; judgment of 6 March 2009

Delivery of possession under Muslim law may be actual or constructive, and may be made in such manner as the subject of the gift is susceptible of. Handing over the deed of gift coupled with the declaration in the document can suffice, and where the donor himself applies for mutation of the property in the donee's name, constructive possession must be held to have been handed over. The conditions of a valid hiba are that the donor be sane, major and owner, that the thing gifted exist and if divisible be separated, that it be lawful under the Shariat and free of things not gifted, and that it come into the possession of the donee or of his representative or guardian.

muslim-lawgifthibaconstructive-deliverymutationtenanted-propertylimitationarticle-59
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2009

Ashok Kumar Mittal v. Ram Kumar Gupta

(2009) 2 Supreme Court Cases 656

Section 35(2) CPC makes it mandatory for the court to give reasons if costs are not awarded following the event. A no-costs order without reasons is liable to be set aside.

CPCcostssection-35costs-follow-eventreasons-mandatoryno-costs-order
Read case brief
Madras High Court (Division Bench)2009

Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motor Company Ltd.

2009 (40) PTC 589 (Mad)

In patent infringement suits, the doctrine of equivalents applies in India. A product infringes if it performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result. Injunction granted against TVS Flame for infringing Bajaj's DTS-i technology patent.

patent-infringementdoctrine-of-equivalentsinjunctionDTS-itwin-spark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2009

CIT v Atul Mohan Bindal

(2009) 9 Supreme Court Cases 589

Reassessment under S.147/148 requires the AO to have 'reason to believe' that income has escaped assessment; mere change of opinion is not permissible.

taxation-lawreassessmentreason-to-believesection-147
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2009

CIT v Eli Lilly and Co

(2009) 15 Supreme Court Cases 1

Employer's contribution to an overseas social security scheme for expatriate employees is allowable as business expenditure.

taxation-lawbusiness-expendituresocial-securityallowable-deduction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2009

Jeewan Kumar Raut v. Central Bank of India

(2010) 12 Supreme Court Cases 278

An employee terminated during maternity leave is entitled to reinstatement. Termination of a woman employee during the period of maternity leave is illegal under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. The Act is a beneficial social legislation and must be given liberal interpretation to protect the interests of women workers.

maternity-benefittermination-during-leavereinstatementbeneficial-legislationwomen-workers
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2009

Ramesh Chandra Agrawal v. Regency Hospital

(2009) 9 SCC 709

Expert medical opinion is advisory, not conclusive; when experts conflict, court evaluates based on reasoning and qualifications and must give reasons for preferring one over another.

evidence-lawexpert-opinionmedical-evidencesection-45medical-negligence
Read case brief
2008

Avnish Bajaj v State (NCT of Delhi)

150 (2008) Delhi Law Times 769

The CEO of an intermediary platform (Bazee.com/eBay) is not automatically liable for obscene content uploaded by users; intermediary liability requires knowledge and failure to act.

it-lawintermediary-liabilityobscenityceo-liabilitysection-79
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2008

Baldev Raj v Bar Council of U.P.

2008 (13) SCALE 525

An advocate found guilty of professional misconduct can be suspended from practice; the period of suspension depends on gravity of the misconduct.

professional-ethicsmisconductsuspensionbar-councilstub
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2008

Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak

(2008) 1 Supreme Court Cases 1

Copyright in India requires a modicum of creativity beyond mere labour; copy-edited judgments with headnotes, paragraph numbering, and cross-references involve sufficient creativity to attract copyright; raw judicial texts do not

copyrightoriginalityjudgmentsheadnotesmodicum-of-creativitysweat-of-brow
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2008

Eli Lilly and Company v. Ranbaxy Laboratories

2008 (37) PTC 399 (Del)

A patent for a pharmaceutical compound (Olanzapine) was held valid. Ranbaxy's challenge on grounds of obviousness and lack of novelty rejected. Process of selection from a known class of compounds can constitute a valid patent if the selection produces unexpected advantages.

patent-validityselection-patentpharmaolanzapineobviousnessnovelty
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2008

Prabhu Lal v DLF Universal Ltd

(2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 726

Equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds requires only deposit + intent; no writing or registration needed

property-lawmortgageequitable-mortgagedeposit-of-title-deedssection-58f
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2008

Rajiv Kapur v Bimla Devi

(2008) 6 Supreme Court Cases 573

The power to transfer a suit or proceeding under Section 24 CPC is discretionary and must be exercised on relevant considerations, including balance of convenience to the parties, avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings, and the interests of justice; a transfer is not to be ordered as a matter of course merely because one party expresses inconvenience or apprehension, without cogent grounds.

section-24-cpctransfer-of-suitsdiscretionbalance-of-convenience
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2008

Rajkumar Gurawara v. S.F.K.

(2008) 14 Supreme Court Cases 151

Post-trial amendment of pleadings was refused where the party's failure to include the ground earlier was due to lack of due diligence, not impossibility. The 2002 proviso to Order VI Rule 17 (no amendment after commencement of trial except due diligence) was applied strictly.

CPCamendmentorder-VI-rule-17post-trialdue-diligence2002-proviso
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2008

Ravi Kamal Bali v. Kala Tech & Ors.

2008 (38) PTC 435 (Del)

Patent infringement is determined by comparing the claims of the patent specification with the alleged infringing product/process; the claims define the monopoly

patentinfringementclaims-constructionsection-48patents-act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2008

Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P.

(2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409

Where police refuse to register an FIR, the aggrieved person should approach the Magistrate under S.156(3) CrPC (now S.175(3) BNSS) rather than the High Court under Art.226. The Magistrate can direct police to register FIR and investigate, and can monitor the investigation.

complaintFIRS.175-BNSSmagistrate-powerspolice-investigationsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2008

State of Punjab v Jalour Singh

(2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 660

A regular Lok Adalat cannot decide cases on merits; it can only record settlements arrived at by consensus between parties

ADRlok-adalatconsentsettlementno-adjudicationlandmark
Read case brief
Karnataka High Court2008

Virupaksha v. Siddamma

AIR 2008 Karnataka 45

Once an easement is extinguished by merger (S.38), it does not automatically revive on subsequent separation of the properties

property-laweasementssection-38mergerextinctionno-revival
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2007

A.V. Papayya Sastry v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

(2007) 4 Supreme Court Cases 221

Fraud under Section 17 of the Limitation Act includes active concealment by the defendant. Where the right to sue was concealed by fraud, limitation does not run until the plaintiff discovered or ought to have discovered the fraud.

limitation-actsection-17fraudconcealmentdiscoveryfresh-limitation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2007

DIT v Morgan Stanley and Co

(2007) 7 Supreme Court Cases 1

Transfer pricing: a foreign enterprise is not liable to tax in India if the Indian subsidiary has been adequately compensated at arm's length.

taxation-lawtransfer-pricingarms-lengthpermanent-establishment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2007

Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages v. CIT

(2007) 293 Income Tax Reports 226 (SC)

If the deductee has paid tax on the income, the deductor cannot be treated as assessee in default for non-deduction of TDS.

taxationTDSassessee-in-defaultsection-201deductor-liability
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2007

ICICI Bank Ltd v. Prakash Kaur

(2007) 2 Supreme Court Cases 711

Banking Regulation Act is a special law for banking companies; it prevails over general company law where specific provision is made

banking-regulationspecial-lawcompanies-actprecedence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (Nine-Judge Bench)2007

IR Coelho v State of Tamil Nadu

(2007) 2 Supreme Court Cases 1

Laws placed in the Ninth Schedule after 24 April 1973 are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution.

Ninth-Schedulebasic-structurejudicial-reviewfundamental-rightsland-reforms
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2007

Kalyanasundaram v. Kalavathi

AIR 2007 Supreme Court 1285

Gift of immovable property without a registered instrument is void under S.123; no title passes regardless of delivery of possession

property-lawTPAsection-123giftregistrationvoidlandmark
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2007

Masroor Ahmed v State (NCT of Delhi)

2008 (103) Delhi Reported Judgments 137; Indian Law Reports (2007) II Delhi 1329; 2007 SCC OnLine Delhi 1357; judgment of 3 October 2007

A triple talaq, talaq-e-biddat, even among Sunni Muslims, is to be regarded as one revocable talaq, so that the iddat period remains available for reflection, revocation and reconciliation. A talaq pronounced in extreme anger, where the husband has lost control of himself, is not effective. Communication to the wife is an essential element of pronouncement, and talaq takes effect on the date of communication; if never communicated it does not take effect at all. Where the talaq is irrevocable the reconciliation attempt must precede pronouncement, but where it is revocable the attempt may come before or after pronouncement provided it is before the end of iddat.

muslim-lawtriple-talaqrevocable-talaqcommunicationangeriddatreconciliationdelhi-high-court
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2007

Raja Ram Pal v Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha

(2007) 3 Supreme Court Cases 184

Article 105(3) carries an inherent power in each House to punish for contempt, including by expulsion of a member. The exercise of that power is subject to judicial review, but only on limited grounds. Article 122 excludes review for irregularity of procedure, not for substantive illegality.

constitutional-lawprivilegesarticle-105article-122expulsioncontempt-of-housejudicial-reviewnatural-justice
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2007

Rajendra Singh Rana v Swami Prasad Maurya

(2007) 4 Supreme Court Cases 270; All India Reporter 2007 Supreme Court 1305

The question of disqualification under the Tenth Schedule must be determined as at the date of the act of defection. A Speaker who fails to decide a pending disqualification petition and instead acts on a later claim of split abdicates his jurisdiction, and that failure is itself correctable by the courts.

constitutional-lawanti-defectiontenth-schedulesplitspeakerdelayabdication-of-jurisdictionjudicial-review
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2007

Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers v CIT

(2007) 5 Supreme Court Cases 785

For reopening assessment under S.147, the AO needs only 'reason to believe'; at the stage of issuing notice, the sufficiency of reasons is not to be tested.

taxation-lawreopeningsection-147reason-to-believe
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2007

Samar Ghosh v Jaya Ghosh

(2007) 4 Supreme Court Cases 511

The Supreme Court laid down illustrative (not exhaustive) instances of mental cruelty as a ground for divorce, holding that mental cruelty must be assessed on the cumulative effect of conduct over time on the reasonable spouse, rather than by isolated incidents alone.

mental-crueltydivorceillustrative-instancescumulative-effect
Read case brief
Punjab and Haryana High Court2007

Smt. Vidya v. Smt. Parmila

AIR 2007 P&H 132

Acceptance of a gift can be implied from conduct such as taking possession, making improvements, and asserting ownership

property-lawTPAsection-122giftacceptanceimplied
Read case brief
Andhra Pradesh High Court2007

Visakha Industries Ltd v. ICICI Bank Ltd

(2007) 4 ALD 481

Customer's counter-indemnity obligation crystallises immediately upon bank paying under guarantee; bank entitled to immediate recovery

bank-guaranteecounter-guaranteeindemnityrecoverysubrogation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Goetze India v CIT

(2006) 284 ITR 323 (Supreme Court)

A claim not made in the return cannot be entertained by the AO during assessment proceedings; it must be made by filing a revised return.

taxation-lawrevised-returnclaimassessment-proceedings
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Indian Bank v. ABS Marine Products Pvt Ltd

(2006) 5 Supreme Court Cases 72

S.13(2) SARFAESI notice must clearly specify the amount of debt, the secured asset, and demand repayment within 60 days; defective notice vitiates subsequent action

SARFAESIS13-2noticeprocedural-complianceNPA-recovery
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Kishansing Tomar v Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad

(2006) 8 Supreme Court Cases 352

The requirement that elections to a Municipality or Panchayat be completed before the expiry of its five year term is mandatory. Pending delimitation, administrative difficulty and want of funds or staff are not valid grounds for postponement, and the State Election Commission stands on the same footing as the Election Commission of India.

constitutional-lawarticle-243uarticle-243elocal-self-governmentstate-election-commissionmandatory-electionsmunicipalitiespanchayats
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Kuldip Nayar v Union of India

(2006) 7 Supreme Court Cases 1; All India Reporter 2006 Supreme Court 3127

Article 84 states the qualifications for membership of Parliament exhaustively, and residence in the State represented is not among them. The Council of States is not a purely federal chamber, so deleting the residence requirement does not violate federalism. The open ballot in such elections is valid.

constitutional-lawarticle-80article-84council-of-statesrajya-sabhafederalismbasic-structureopen-ballot
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Lata Singh v State of U.P.

(2006) 5 Supreme Court Cases 475

An inter-caste or inter-religious marriage between two consenting adults is perfectly legal and valid; no one including family members can threaten or harass the couple; any such harassment or threat of violence is illegal and actionable.

inter-caste-marriageconsentadult-marriageright-to-marryarticle-21honour-killing
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

M. Nagaraj and Ors. v Union of India and Ors.

(2006) 8 Supreme Court Cases 212

Constitutional amendments enabling reservation in promotions for SC/ST (77th, 81st, 82nd, 85th Amendments) are valid, but the state must satisfy three conditions: (a) backwardness of the class, (b) inadequate representation, and (c) no adverse effect on overall administrative efficiency.

article-16-4areservation-in-promotionquantifiable-dataadministrative-efficiency
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

MRF Ltd. v Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Sales Tax and Ors.

(2006) 8 Supreme Court Cases 702

A legitimate expectation arising from a settled practice, policy, or clear representation of a public authority can be defeated by a change in policy made bona fide in the larger public interest; the doctrine of legitimate expectation does not confer a substantive, indefeasible right, but only a procedural entitlement to fair treatment, including a hearing or reasoned justification, before the expectation is disappointed.

legitimate-expectationpolicy-changepublic-interestprocedural-entitlement
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Naveen Kohli v Neelu Kohli

AIR 2006 Supreme Court 1675

Irretrievable breakdown of marriage, though not a statutory ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, should be recognised by the legislature as a ground; the Supreme Court recommended amendment of the Act to include it, and granted divorce on facts amounting to cruelty given the total collapse of the marital relationship.

irretrievable-breakdowncrueltydivorcelegislative-recommendation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Om Prakash Srivastava v Union of India

(2006) 6 Supreme Court Cases 207

Territorial jurisdiction of a court to try an offence, or of a civil court to entertain a suit, must be determined based on where the cause of action, in whole or in part, actually arose; a court cannot assume jurisdiction merely because a party resides within its territorial limits, absent a genuine connection between the cause of action and that territory.

territorial-jurisdictioncause-of-actionforum-selection
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Prakash Singh v. Union of India

(2006) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1

Seven directives for police reform: State Security Commission, fixed DGP tenure, fixed SHO tenure, separation of investigation from law and order, Police Establishment Board, Police Complaints Authority, National Security Commission.

police-reformseven-directivesgovernancearticle-21sem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Rameshwar Prasad v Union of India

(2006) 2 Supreme Court Cases 1; All India Reporter 2006 Supreme Court 980

A Governor's report founding action under Article 356 cannot rest on surmise, conjecture or apprehension. He is not a constitutional guardian of political morality, and post-election realignment among parties is not by itself illegitimate. Dissolution of an Assembly on such a report is unconstitutional.

constitutional-lawarticle-356governordissolutionpresidents-rulehorse-tradingjudicial-reviewsuspended-animation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2006

Seema v Ashwani Kumar

(2006) 2 Supreme Court Cases 578

Compulsory registration of marriages should be made mandatory across India as a matter of policy, since registration provides prima facie proof of marriage and helps prevent issues like child marriage, bigamy, and denial of maintenance rights.

marriage-registrationcompulsory-registrationevidentiary-valuedirections
Read case brief
2006

State Bank of India v Dr. V.P.S. Rathore

(2006) 7 Supreme Court Cases 188

Unauthorized electronic fund transfer due to bank's system failure makes the bank liable for restitution; banks must maintain adequate cyber security.

it-lawelectronic-bankingunauthorized-transfercyber-securitybank-liability
Read case brief
Andhra Pradesh High Court2006

Syed Mohd. Bakshi v. State of AP

AIR 2006 Andhra Pradesh 126

An easement must accommodate the dominant tenement (benefit the land itself), not merely benefit the owner's personal convenience or business

property-laweasementssection-4accommodationpersonal-benefit
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

Bhanu Kumar Jain v. Archana Kumar

(2005) 1 Supreme Court Cases 787; AIR 2005 Supreme Court 626

A defendant against whom an ex parte decree is passed has two concurrent remedies: an application under Order IX Rule 13 to set aside the decree, and an appeal under Section 96(2). Both can be pursued simultaneously but the same grounds cannot be urged in both.

CPCex-parte-decreeorder-IX-rule-13section-96setting-asidesufficient-causeappeal
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

CREF Finance Ltd. v. Shree Shanthi Homes (P) Ltd.

(2005) 7 Supreme Court Cases 467

A Magistrate takes cognizance of an offence and not of an offender. Cognizance is taken at the point when the Magistrate applies mind to the allegations in a complaint/police report and decides to proceed.

cognizancemagistrate-powersS.228-BNSStaking-cognizancesem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

In Re: Noise Pollution

(2005) 5 Supreme Court Cases 733

Reasonable noise regulation, including during festivals and celebrations, appropriately balances cultural and religious expression against the countervailing right to environmental peace.

noise-pollutionsuo-motufestivalszone-based-standards
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab

(2005) 6 Supreme Court Cases 1

A mere error of judgment, without more, does not constitute negligence; the standard is reasonable care and skill expected of a reasonably competent practitioner, not guaranteed success.

medical-negligencebolam-standardcriminal-negligence
Read case brief
2005

NASSCOM v Ajay Sood

119 (2005) Delhi Law Times 596

Phishing: fraudulently collecting personal data by impersonating legitimate entities online: is actionable as passing off even in the absence of specific legislation; the Delhi HC recognized phishing as illegal.

it-lawphishingpassing-offcyber-frauddata-theft
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

P.T. Thomas v Thomas Job

(2005) 6 Supreme Court Cases 478

A Lok Adalat award passed without genuine consent of both parties is a nullity; consent must be real, not merely formal

ADRlok-adalatconsentnullity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

Pratap Singh v. State of Jharkhand

(2005) 3 Supreme Court Cases 551

The relevant date for determining whether an accused is a juvenile is the date of commission of the offence, not the date of apprehension or trial.

juvenile-justiceage-determinationdate-of-commissionJJ-Actsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

Salem Advocate Bar Association v Union of India

AIR 2005 Supreme Court 3353; (2005) 6 Supreme Court Cases 344

S.89 CPC is constitutionally valid; directed framing of mediation rules for civil courts; courts must actively explore ADR in suitable cases

ADRsection-89CPCconstitutional-validitymediation-ruleslandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

Sarbananda Sonowal v Union of India

(2005) 5 Supreme Court Cases 665; All India Reporter 2005 Supreme Court 2920

Large scale illegal influx of persons into a State can amount to external aggression within Article 355, which casts an enforceable duty on the Union to protect every State against it. A law which by reversing the ordinary burden of proof makes detection of illegal migrants practically impossible is a failure to discharge that duty and is unconstitutional.

constitutional-lawarticle-355external-aggressionillegal-migrationburden-of-proofadministrative-relationsforeigners-act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

Savitaben Somabhai Bhatia v. State of Gujarat

(2005) 3 Supreme Court Cases 636

A divorced Muslim woman is entitled to maintenance under S.125 CrPC (now S.144 BNSS). This secular remedy applies to all women irrespective of religion.

maintenanceS.144-BNSSMuslim-womanseculardivorced-wifesem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

Smt. Kamla v. Chairman, APSRTC

(2005) 7 Supreme Court Cases 400

Doctrine of notional extension extends the course of employment to cover a reasonable route and time of commuting between home and workplace.

compensationnotional-extensioncommuting-accidentcourse-of-employment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2005

State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO

(2005) 3 Supreme Court Cases 752

The State/Government is not entitled to special treatment in condonation of delay. Departmental delay and internal procedural requirements do not by themselves constitute 'sufficient cause'. The State must meet the same standard as any private litigant.

limitation-actsection-5condonationgovernment-delayno-special-treatmentdepartmental-delay
Read case brief
2005

Tata Consultancy Services v State of AP

AIR 2005 Supreme Court 371

Software supplied on a medium (CD/floppy) is 'goods' liable to sales tax; canned software is tangible property even though it embodies intellectual effort.

it-lawsoftware-as-goodssales-taxcanned-softwaretangible-property
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2004

Bar Council of India v. High Court of Kerala

(2004) 6 Supreme Court Cases 311

Post-Advocates Act, disciplinary jurisdiction over advocates vests exclusively in Bar Councils. Courts retain only contempt jurisdiction, not independent disciplinary power.

professional-ethicsjurisdictiondisciplinarybar-councilhigh-court
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2004

Exphar SA and Anr. v Eupharma Laboratories Ltd. and Anr.

(2004) 3 Supreme Court Cases 688

In a suit for infringement of trademark or copyright, the plaintiff can institute the suit at a place where it carries on business, under Section 62 of the Copyright Act (and analogous provisions), even if the defendant's infringing acts occurred elsewhere, since these special statutory provisions provide an additional forum beyond the ordinary place-of-suing rules under Section 20 CPC.

place-of-suingspecial-forumcopyright-actsection-62additional-forum
Read case brief
Andhra Pradesh High Court2004

Government of AP v. Thammadi Narayanappa

2004 (5) ALD 480

Transfer of land by a tribal to a non-tribal in a Scheduled Area is void ab initio under the AP Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 (Regulation 1 of 1959). The tribal is entitled to restoration of land regardless of the period elapsed or the non-tribal's development of the land. The Regulation is a protective legislation and must be given liberal construction.

scheduled-areatribal-land-transfervoid-ab-initioregulation-1-of-1959restorationprotective-legislation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2004

K Balakrishnan v K Kamalam

(2004) 1 Supreme Court Cases 681

Acceptance by donee is essential for valid gift; acceptance can be implied from conduct (mutation, possession, tax payment)

property-lawgiftacceptancesection-122implied-acceptance
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2004

Mahendra Saree Emporium v. G.V. Sathyanarayana

(2004) 11 Supreme Court Cases 665

The executing court must execute the decree as it stands. It cannot go behind the decree, reopen the underlying dispute, or modify the decree during execution. The decree is final and binding on the executing court.

CPCexecutiondecree-as-it-standsno-modificationexecuting-court-limits
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2004

Mardia Chemicals Ltd v. Union of India

(2004) 4 Supreme Court Cases 311

SARFAESI Act is constitutionally valid; but 75% pre-deposit requirement for DRT appeal struck down as making remedy illusory

SARFAESIconstitutional-validitypre-depositS17DRTfundamental-rights
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2004

Noratanmal Chouraria v M.R. Murli

(2004) 5 Supreme Court Cases 689

An advocate cannot act against a former client in a matter substantially related to the earlier retainer; duty of confidentiality survives termination of retainer.

professional-ethicsconflict-of-interestduty-to-clientconfidentialityformer-client
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2004

Rame Gowda (dead) by LRs v M Varadappa Naidu (dead) by LRs

(2004) 1 Supreme Court Cases 769

A person in settled possession of property, even without title, is entitled to protect that possession against everyone, including the true owner, unless the owner recovers possession through due process of law.

settled-possessionspecific-relief-actsection-6forcible-dispossession
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2004

Sopan Sukhdeo Sable v. Assistant Charity Commissioner

(2004) 3 Supreme Court Cases 137

When deciding an application for rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11, the court must read the plaint as a whole. If any part of the plaint discloses a cause of action, the plaint cannot be rejected.

CPCrejection-of-plaintorder-VII-rule-11cause-of-actionplaint-as-whole
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2004

State of Punjab v Nestle India Ltd.

(2004) 6 Supreme Court Cases 465

The doctrine of promissory estoppel can be invoked against the government where it has made a clear and unambiguous promise or representation, and a party has acted upon it to its detriment; however, the government can resile from such a promise where overriding public interest requires it, and the burden of establishing that overriding public interest lies on the government seeking to resile.

promissory-estoppellegitimate-expectationpublic-interest-exceptiongovernment-representation
Read case brief
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai2004

State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti

CC No.4680/2004 (Egmore Court, Chennai)

First Indian conviction under the IT Act 2000 (S.67); posting obscene and defamatory content about a woman on internet group is punishable

IT-lawcyber-crimeS67first-convictionobscenitylandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Bank of India v. O.P. Swarnakar

(2003) 2 Supreme Court Cases 721

An offer accepted under a voluntary retirement scheme cannot be unilaterally withdrawn by the offeree employee once communicated and acted upon by the employer within the scheme's terms.

revocation-of-acceptancevoluntary-retirement-schemebanking
Read case brief
Bombay High Court2003

Bank of Maharashtra v. Morning Star Travels

(2003) 5 Bombay CR 516

Collecting bank holds cheque proceeds as trustee for the customer until crediting to account; thereafter relationship converts to debtor-creditor

collecting-bankertrusteecheque-collectionconversion-of-relationship
Read case brief
2003

Casio India v Ashita Tele Systems

2003 (27) PTC 265 (Delhi)

Domain name identical or deceptively similar to a registered trademark constitutes passing off and trademark infringement in cyber space.

it-lawdomain-namepassing-offtrademarkcyber-squatting
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers

(2003) 3 Supreme Court Cases 57

Harmonious construction applied to resolve conflict between two provisions of the Income Tax Act. Neither provision should be rendered redundant; both must be given effect.

harmonious-constructionconflict-between-provisionsincome-taxboth-given-effect
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India

(2003) 2 Supreme Court Cases 45

Lawyers have no right to go on strike or boycott courts. Courts should not adjourn cases merely because lawyers are on strike.

professional-ethicsstrikeboycottright-to-practiceadvocates-act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd v. ITO

(2003) 259 Income Tax Reports 19 (SC)

When S.148 notice is issued, the assessee must file return, raise objections, and AO must pass a speaking order on objections before proceeding with reassessment.

taxationreassessmentsection-148natural-justiceobjectionsspeaking-order
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Hari Om v. Shakuntala Devi

AIR 2003 Supreme Court 2632

S.53A protects possession against the transferor and any person claiming under the transferor, including subsequent purchasers

property-lawTPAsection-53Apart-performancesubsequent-purchaser
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Justice K. Ranganath Mishra v Union of India

(2003) 7 Supreme Court Cases 133

Fundamental Duties under Art.51A remain non-justiciable and cannot be directly enforced against citizens through judicial compulsion, but the state can promote awareness and compliance through education and policy.

fundamental-dutiesarticle-51anon-justiciablepromotion-of-duties
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

MACT Muzaffarnagar v. Oriental Insurance

(2003) 4 Supreme Court Cases 481

The object of attachment and sale in execution is to give the decree-holder practical relief, not to financially destroy the judgment-debtor. The executing court must balance the decree-holder's right to enforcement with the judgment-debtor's interest in survival.

CPCexecutionattachmentsalebalance-of-interestsdecree-holderjudgment-debtor
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Mysore Cements Ltd. v Svedala Barmac Ltd.

(2003) 10 Supreme Court Cases 375

A conciliation settlement agreement under S.73 cannot be set aside merely because one party later regrets the terms; it is final and binding like an arbitral award

ADRconciliationsettlementsection-73finality
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Ram Chandra Singh v Savitri Devi and Ors.

(2003) 8 Supreme Court Cases 319

A counterclaim, once properly set up by a defendant under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC, is treated as a cross-suit and must be adjudicated on its own merits, independent of the fate of the plaintiff's original claim; even if the plaintiff's suit is dismissed, withdrawn, or otherwise disposed of, the counterclaim survives and must be decided by the court.

counterclaimorder-8-rule-6across-suitindependent-adjudication
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra

(2003) 1 Supreme Court Cases 557

Rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 is not a dismissal on merits. Order VII Rule 13 expressly permits filing a fresh plaint on the same cause of action after rejection. Rejection does not create res judicata.

CPCrejection-of-plaintorder-VII-rule-11rule-13fresh-plaintres-judicata-not-applicable
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Shiv Shakti Cooperative Housing Society v. Swaraj Developers

(2003) 6 Supreme Court Cases 659

Procedural law must be interpreted to advance substantive justice, not obstruct it. Where procedural and substantive provisions conflict, the interpretation that furthers justice prevails.

CPCprocedural-lawsubstantive-justiceliberal-interpretationprocedure-serves-justice
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

T.K. Rangarajan v. State of Tamil Nadu

(2003) 6 Supreme Court Cases 581

There is no fundamental right to strike under the Indian Constitution; government employees especially have no moral or equitable justification for strikes

landmarkno-fundamental-right-to-strikegovernment-employeesmass-dismissalArt-19
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan

(2003) 263 Income Tax Reports 706 (SC)

Treaty shopping through Mauritius is legitimate; a valid Tax Residency Certificate issued by Mauritius government is conclusive proof of residence for DTAA benefits.

taxationDTAAtreaty-shoppingMauritiusTRCdouble-taxation-reliefsection-90
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2003

Union of India v. Prakash P. Hinduja

(2003) 6 Supreme Court Cases 195

Investigation, inquiry, and trial are distinct stages of criminal proceedings. Investigation is conducted by police, inquiry by Magistrate, and trial by the competent court. The right to a fair investigation is part of Art.21, and investigation must be completed within reasonable time.

investigationinquirytrialdistinctionS.2-BNSSArt-21sem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

All India Judges Association v Union of India

(2002) 4 Supreme Court Cases 247; All India Reporter 2002 Supreme Court 1752

The independence and efficiency of the subordinate judiciary are constitutional imperatives, and the Court may issue structural directions to secure them. Directions were given on pay, the judge to population ratio, direct recruitment of about twenty five per cent of district judges from the Bar, and a limited competitive examination for accelerated promotion.

constitutional-lawsubordinate-judiciaryjudicial-serviceshetty-commissiondirect-recruitmentjudicial-independenceservice-conditions
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

Central Bank of India v. Ravindra

(2002) 1 Supreme Court Cases 367

RBI directions under S.35A of the Banking Regulation Act have statutory force and are binding on all banking companies

banking-regulationRBI-powersS35Adirections
Read case brief
Rajasthan High Court2002

Dev Kishan v Ram Kishan

AIR 2002 Rajasthan 370

The doctrine of pious obligation does not extend to sons' liability for a father's debts that are avyavaharika (illegal, immoral, or tainted, such as debts incurred for gambling or illicit purposes).

pious-obligationavyavaharika-debtsons-liabilitykartaalienation
Read case brief
2002

Dow Jones v Gutnick

[2002] HCA 56

For internet defamation, the tort is committed where the publication is downloaded and read, not where it is uploaded; the place of downloading determines jurisdiction (Australian High Court).

it-lawinternet-jurisdictiondefamationplace-of-publicationaustralia
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

In Re: Arundhati Roy

(2002) 3 Supreme Court Cases 343

Criminal contempt can lie against any person (not just advocates) for scandalizing or lowering the authority of the court; public figures must exercise restraint.

professional-ethicscontempt-of-courtfree-speechscandalizing-court
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. v Ram Gopal Sharma

AIR 2002 Supreme Court 643

Under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, where an employer dismisses a workman for misconduct during the pendency of proceedings and applies to the tribunal for approval, the tribunal's approval must be sought and obtained; if the tribunal does not approve the action, the dismissal remains inoperative, and mere passage of time or delay in seeking approval does not validate an otherwise unapproved dismissal.

section-33-2-bapproval-of-dismissalpendency-of-proceedingsmisconduct
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhat Shah

(2002) 3 Supreme Court Cases 65

Passing off requires proof of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage; goodwill extends to areas where trader has reputation even without physical presence

trademarkpassing-offgoodwillmisrepresentationdamage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhat Shah

(2002) 3 Supreme Court Cases 65

Passing off requires proof of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage; goodwill extends to areas where trader has reputation even without physical presence

trademarkpassing-offgoodwillmisrepresentationdamage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

Nirmala Anand v Sri Advent Corporation Pvt Ltd

(2002) 8 Supreme Court Cases 146

A rise in the price of property between the date of agreement and the date of decree is not, by itself, a ground to refuse specific performance; courts may mould relief by directing additional compensation to offset price escalation.

specific-performanceprice-escalationdiscretion-of-courtspecific-relief-act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (Seven-Judge Bench)2002

Pradeep Kumar Biswas and Ors. v Indian Institute of Chemical Biology and Ors.

(2002) 5 Supreme Court Cases 111

The determinative factor in deciding whether a body is 'State' under Article 12 is whether it is financially, functionally, and administratively dominated by, or under the deep and pervasive control of, the government; the Ajay Hasia factors are indicative pointers, not a rigid checklist.

article-12deep-and-pervasive-controlinstrumentality-of-statecsirseven-judge-bench
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

Shamim Ara v State of Uttar Pradesh

(2002) 7 Supreme Court Cases 518; All India Reporter 2002 Supreme Court 3551; judgment of 1 October 2002

A talaq, to be effective, has to be pronounced, and the burden of proving the pronouncement lies on the husband. A talaq must be for reasonable cause and must be preceded by an attempt at reconciliation. A plea of previous divorce taken in a written statement cannot be treated as a pronouncement of talaq on the date of filing the written statement followed by delivery of a copy to the wife.

muslim-lawtalaqpronouncementproof-of-talaqreasonable-causereconciliationwritten-statementsection-125-crpc
Read case brief
2002

Specht v Netscape Communications Corp

306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002)

Browse-wrap agreements are not enforceable unless the user has actual or constructive notice of the terms; mere availability of terms on a linked page is insufficient (US 2nd Circuit).

it-lawbrowse-wrapnoticeenforceabilityonline-contractus-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (Eleven-Judge Bench)2002

T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Ors. v State of Karnataka and Ors.

(2002) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481

Private unaided educational institutions, including minority institutions, have a right under Arts.19(1)(g) and 30 to establish and administer institutions, including autonomy over admissions and fee structures, subject to reasonable regulation to ensure merit-based admission and prevent commercialisation.

article-19-1-garticle-30minority-institutionsright-to-educationautonomy
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

Union of India v Association for Democratic Reforms

(2002) 5 Supreme Court Cases 294; All India Reporter 2002 Supreme Court 2112

The right of a voter to know the antecedents of a candidate is part of the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). Since Article 324 is a reservoir of power operating where the law is silent, the Election Commission may require candidates to disclose criminal cases, assets and liabilities, and educational qualifications.

constitutional-lawarticle-324article-19right-to-knowelection-commissiondisclosurecandidate-antecedentsfree-and-fair-elections
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2002

Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Telecom District Manager

(2002) 5 Supreme Court Cases 448

Article 113 (residual 3-year period) of the Limitation Act applies only when no other article in the Schedule covers the suit. Where a specific article covers the subject matter, Article 113 is excluded.

limitation-actarticle-113residual-period3-yearspecific-article-prevails
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2001

AIIMS Students' Union v AIIMS

AIR 2002 Supreme Court 3262

Fundamental Duties under Art.51A, while not directly enforceable, can be used by courts as an interpretive aid to test the reasonableness of restrictions on fundamental rights; excessive institutional reservation in admissions violates Art.14.

fundamental-dutiesarticle-51ainstitutional-reservationarticle-14interpretive-aid
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2001

Bhaskar Industries Ltd. v. Bhiwani Denim & Apparels Ltd.

(2001) 7 Supreme Court Cases 401

Summons issued under S.61 CrPC (now S.64 BNSS) for appearance of accused must be served in the manner prescribed; substituted service is permissible only after due diligence in personal service.

summonsservice-of-processS.64-BNSSsubstituted-servicesem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2001

Bipin Shantilal Panchal v State of Gujarat and Anr.

(2001) 3 Supreme Court Cases 1

Objections to the admissibility of documents or evidence raised during trial should ordinarily not stall the trial's progress; the trial court should provisionally allow the document to be marked, noting the objection, and decide on the admissibility question at the final judgment stage, along with the rest of the case, in order to avoid piecemeal appeals and unnecessary delay in the trial process.

admissibility-of-documentsmark-subject-to-objectionprocedural-efficiencypiecemeal-appeals
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (five Judge Constitution Bench)2001

Danial Latifi v Union of India

(2001) 7 Supreme Court Cases 740; All India Reporter 2001 Supreme Court 3958; judgment of 28 September 2001

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 is constitutionally valid but is read down. The obligation of a Muslim husband under S.3(1)(a) is not confined to the iddat period. Reasonable and fair provision and maintenance are distinct: the husband must, within the iddat period, make and pay a reasonable and fair provision for his divorced wife extending beyond the iddat period, in addition to maintenance for the iddat period itself. If she is unable to maintain herself after iddat and has not remarried, recourse lies against her relatives under S.4 and failing them against the State Wakf Board.

muslim-lawmaintenance1986-actiddatreasonable-and-fair-provisionreading-downshah-banoconstitution-bench
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)2001

Lister v. Hesley Hall Ltd.

[2001] UKHL 22

The relevant test for vicarious liability asks whether the employee's wrongful conduct was so closely connected to their employment that it would be fair and just to hold the employer vicariously liable (the 'close connection' test).

vicarious-liabilityclose-connection-testcourse-of-employment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2001

Mohan Baitha v. State of Bihar

(2001) 4 Supreme Court Cases 350

Misjoinder of charges or persons is a curable irregularity under S.218 CrPC (now S.252 BNSS) and does not vitiate trial unless failure of justice has actually occurred. Separate trials are the rule; joint trial is the exception requiring nexus between offences.

chargejoindermisjoinderS.247-BNSSS.252-BNSSjoint-trialsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2001

Om Kumar v. Union of India

(2001) 2 Supreme Court Cases 386

Dual standard: proportionality applies where fundamental rights are engaged; Wednesbury applies for other administrative decisions

administrative-lawproportionalitywednesburydual-standardart-14art-19art-21
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2001

Pravin C. Shah v K.A. Mohd. Ali

(2001) 8 Supreme Court Cases 650

An advocate holding a full-time salaried employment cannot practise; dual capacity is impermissible under the Advocates Act.

professional-ethicsfull-time-employmentright-to-practiseadvocates-act
Read case brief
2001

Ritu Kohli Case (Delhi)

Criminal Case No. 171/2001 (Delhi)

First reported Indian case of cyber-stalking: using another person's identity on internet chat rooms to cause harassment constitutes an offence under the IT Act.

it-lawcyber-stalkingidentity-theftfirst-caseit-act
Read case brief
Delhi High Court2001

Sanjay Kumari v. Helmut Nahr

2001 SCC OnLine Del 866

Oral testimony about the contents of a marriage certificate is inadmissible; the document must be produced.

evidence-lawdocumentary-evidenceoral-evidencemarriage-certificatesection-91
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2001

Shambu Ram Yadav v Hanuman Das Khatry

(2001) 6 Supreme Court Cases 1

Disciplinary proceedings against advocates are quasi-judicial; principles of natural justice including opportunity of hearing must be strictly followed.

professional-ethicsdisciplinary-proceedingsnatural-justicequasi-judicial
Read case brief
Andhra Pradesh High Court2001

State of Andhra Pradesh v Mohd Ashrafuddin

(2001) 2 ALD 42

Assigned lands can be resumed by the State upon breach of conditions of assignment, including unauthorised alienation or change of use

assigned-landsresumptionbreach-of-conditionsland-reformsAndhra-Pradesh
Read case brief
2001

Tata Sons Ltd v Manu Kosuri

2001 PTC 432 (Delhi)

Registration and use of a domain name identical to a well-known trademark (tata.net) by an unauthorized person constitutes cyber-squatting and passing off.

it-lawdomain-nametatacyber-squattingwell-known-mark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2001

Union Bank of India v. Anil Kumar

AIR 2001 Supreme Court 2083

Marshalling cannot be applied if it would prejudice the senior creditor's recovery or injure the rights of an intermediate encumbrancer

property-lawTPAmarshallinglimitationprejudice
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Abdul Nazar Madani v. State of Tamil Nadu

(2000) 6 Supreme Court Cases 204

Transfer of criminal case is warranted where a fair and impartial trial is not possible in the original court due to local prejudice, hostile atmosphere, or threat to the accused.

transferfair-trialarticle-21S.430-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Anthony v KC Ittoop and Sons

(2000) 6 Supreme Court Cases 394

Bare right to sue is non-transferable (S.6(e)); but right to sue incidental to property transfer is valid

property-lawright-to-suesection-6eactionable-claim
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Arnit Das v. State of Bihar

(2000) 5 Supreme Court Cases 488

The relevant date for determining juvenility of an accused is the date of commission of the offence, not the date of arrest, trial, or cognizance.

juvenile-justiceage-determinationdate-of-offenceJJ-Actsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Govindrao v. Namdeo

AIR 2000 Supreme Court 1560

A landlocked parcel created by severance acquires an implied easement of necessity over the retained portion for access

property-laweasementssection-13necessitylandlockedlandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Gulamhussain Kutubuddin Maner v Abdulrashid Abdulrajak Maner

(2000) 8 Supreme Court Cases 507; (2001) 1 Maharashtra Law Journal 427; judgment of 19 July 2000

Where the father of a minor is alive, the mother cannot act as, or be appointed, guardian of the minor's property for the purpose of accepting a gift on his behalf, and a gift so accepted is invalid. Valia Peedikakkandi Katheessa Umma applies only where the father and paternal grandfather are not alive, that is, where no guardian of the property is in existence. A High Court cannot find an agency by the husband in the wife's favour where it was neither pleaded nor supported by evidence.

muslim-lawgifthibaminor-doneeguardian-of-propertymotherfather-aliveletters-of-administration
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Haldiram Bhujiawala v Anand Kumar Deepak Kumar

(2000) 3 Supreme Court Cases 250; All India Reporter 2000 Supreme Court 1287

Section 69(2) bars only a suit to enforce a right arising from a contract entered into by the unregistered firm in the course of its business. A suit to enforce a statutory or common law right, such as an action for trademark infringement or passing off, is not barred.

partnershipsection-69registrationunregistered-firmstatutory-righttrademarkpassing-off
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. v. Union of India

(2000) 2 Supreme Court Cases 536

A repeal of a statute does not revive the statute that was repealed by the repealed statute (no revival by implication). Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 preserves rights accrued and liabilities incurred under the repealed statute.

repealsection-6-GCAno-revivalpending-proceedingsvested-rightssavings-clause
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Kunhayammed v State of Kerala

(2000) 6 Supreme Court Cases 359

An SLP does not automatically stay the operation of the High Court order; the interim order continues unless specifically stayed.

taxation-lawslpstayinterim-orderappellate-procedure
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Lily Thomas v Union of India

(2000) 6 Supreme Court Cases 224

Affirmed Sarla Mudgal; a Hindu marriage cannot be dissolved by unilateral conversion; conversion-based second marriage is bigamy.

family-lawbigamyconversionhindu-marriagepersonal-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

R.D. Saxena v. Balram Prasad Sharma

(2000) 7 Supreme Court Cases 264

Client's money is trust property. Misappropriation constitutes criminal breach of trust and professional misconduct warranting removal from the roll.

professional-ethicsmisappropriationclient-moneytrustremoval
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

State of Bihar v Bal Mukund Sah

(2000) 4 Supreme Court Cases 640; All India Reporter 2000 Supreme Court 1296

Articles 233 and 234 constitute a special and self-contained scheme for recruitment to the judicial service, requiring the participation of the High Court. A general State law on recruitment to public services cannot displace that scheme, so reservation in the judicial service must be effected through rules framed in consultation with the High Court.

constitutional-lawarticle-233article-234judicial-servicereservationspecial-schemehigh-court-consultationsubordinate-judiciary
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

State of U.P. v. Chandrika

(2000) 1 Supreme Court Cases 456

Plea bargaining (compounding) in serious offences undermines the criminal justice system. However, in compoundable offences, courts should encourage settlement. The distinction between compoundable and non-compoundable offences is fundamental: non-compoundable offences cannot be compromised without court permission or statutory sanction.

plea-bargainingcompoundingS.313-BNSSS.320-CrPCsettlementsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India2000

Uttam Singh Duggal and Co. Ltd. v United Bank of India

(2000) 7 Supreme Court Cases 120

An admission made by a party, whether in pleadings or otherwise, if clear and unambiguous, can form the basis for a court to pass a decree, including summary judgment, without requiring a full trial on that admitted aspect; the object of allowing decrees based on admissions is to avoid unnecessary and protracted trials on matters no longer genuinely in dispute.

admissionsorder-12-rule-6judgment-on-admissionssummary-decree
Read case brief
2000

Yahoo! Inc v LICRA

169 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (N.D. Cal. 2001)

A foreign court's order directing a US company to block access to content violating local law raises jurisdictional conflict; the country where harm occurs can assert jurisdiction over internet content (French court).

it-lawinternet-jurisdictionfrancehate-speechcross-border
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1999

Balraj Taneja v. Sunil Madan

(1999) 8 Supreme Court Cases 396

The 30-day time limit for filing a written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 is directory, not mandatory. However, post-2002 Amendment, the 90-day outer limit is strictly enforced and courts cannot grant extension beyond it.

CPCwritten-statementorder-VIII-rule-1time-limitdirectorymandatory30-day90-day
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1999

Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay v Sriyanesh Knitters

(1999) 7 Supreme Court Cases 359; All India Reporter 1999 Supreme Court 2947

A port trust holding goods as a bailee has a general lien over them for its dues, arising from its statutory powers and the running account character of its business, and may refuse delivery until those dues are paid.

bailmentliengeneral-liensection-171port-truststatutory-lien
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1999

Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever Ltd.

(1999) 7 Supreme Court Cases 1

Genuine, substantiated comparative claims constitute permissible competitive marketing; false, misleading, or improperly disparaging claims cross into actionable unfair trade practice.

unfair-trade-practicecomparative-advertisingconsumer-protection
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1999

Githa Hariharan v Reserve Bank of India

AIR 1999 Supreme Court 1149

Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, which names the father as the 'natural guardian' and the mother only 'after' him, must be read to mean the mother can act as natural guardian even during the father's lifetime if he is absent, indifferent, or by mutual agreement of the parents, in order to save the provision from being unconstitutional and discriminatory against women.

natural-guardiansection-6-hmgagender-equalityarticle-14article-15
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1999

K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan

(1999) 7 Supreme Court Cases 510

In cases under S.138 Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonour of cheque), five jurisdictional components exist and the offence can be tried by a court having jurisdiction over any of these: place of drawing, presenting, dishonour, issuing notice, or non-payment.

jurisdictioncheque-dishonourS.138-NI-Actsummons-casesterritorial-jurisdictionsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1999

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Jai Lal

(1999) 7 SCC 280

Expert opinion on handwriting is weak evidence and cannot by itself form the sole basis for conviction; it requires corroboration.

evidence-lawexpert-opinionhandwriting-expertsection-45corroborationweak-evidence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1999

Trisuns Chemical Industry v. Rajesh Agarwal

(1999) 8 Supreme Court Cases 686

The jurisdiction of a criminal court to entertain and try an offence depends on whether any part of the cause of action arose within its territorial limits. For offences involving transactions at multiple locations, jurisdiction lies where any essential ingredient of the offence occurred.

jurisdictionterritorialcause-of-actionmulti-location-offenceS.211-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1999

V. Sudeer v. Bar Council of India

(1999) 3 Supreme Court Cases 176

Legal profession is not a trade or business. BCI's regulatory power does not violate Art. 19(1)(g). Right to practice flows from statutory enrolment.

professional-ethicsright-to-practiceBCIfundamental-rightsarticle-19
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1999

Vidhyadhar v. Manikrao

AIR 1999 Supreme Court 1441

Delivery of possession without a registered sale deed does not constitute a valid sale for immovable property valued above Rs.100

property-lawTPAsection-54registrationdeliverypossession
Read case brief
Delhi High Court1999

Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora

1999 PTC (19) 201 (Del)

Domain names are entitled to trademark-level protection; first Indian case recognising domain name as business identifier

trademarkdomain-namespassing-offinternet
Read case brief
Securities Appellate Tribunal / SEBI1998

Hindustan Lever Ltd v SEBI

SAT Appeal No.15/2001 (originally 1998 SEBI order)

A company can be an 'insider' if its officers possess UPSI; company's trade is attributed to those officers' knowledge; merger information is classic UPSI

insider-tradingUPSIcompany-as-insidermergerSEBI
Read case brief
1998

Hotmail Corporation v Van Money Pie Inc

47 U.S.P.Q.2d 1020 (N.D. Cal. 1998)

Sending unsolicited bulk email (spam) through another's email service violates terms of service and constitutes unauthorized access; injunctive relief granted (US).

it-lawspamunauthorized-accessinjunctionemailus-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1998

Indian Bank v Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd.

AIR 1998 Supreme Court 1952

Section 10 CPC (stay of suit on ground of sub judice) applies only where the matter in issue in the subsequent suit is directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, litigating under the same title, in a court of competent jurisdiction; it does not apply merely because there is some connection or overlap in subject matter, and courts must examine the issues closely before granting a stay.

section-10-cpcsub-judicedirectly-and-substantially-in-issuestay-of-suit
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1998

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (CNG Case)

(1998) 9 Supreme Court Cases 589 (and continuing orders)

Courts can order direct fuel and technology transition where the severity and urgency of vehicular air pollution warrants more decisive intervention than incremental emission standard tightening alone.

vehicular-pollutioncngdelhi-air-quality
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1998

N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy

(1998) 7 Supreme Court Cases 123

Length of delay is a factor but not determinative in condonation applications under S.5 Limitation Act. Even a long delay may be condoned if the cause is genuine and bona fide throughout the entire period.

limitation-actsection-5condonationlength-of-delaysufficient-causegenuine-cause
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1998

Naga People's Movement of Human Rights v Union of India

(1998) 2 Supreme Court Cases 109; All India Reporter 1998 Supreme Court 431

Entry 2A of the Union List covers the deployment of armed forces of the Union in a State in aid of the civil power. Such deployment does not supplant the State administration: the forces act in aid of the civil power, which continues to function, so there is no imposition of emergency by implication.

constitutional-lawentry-2aarmed-forces-special-powers-actdeploymentpublic-orderadministrative-relationsdisturbed-areasafeguards
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1998

Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana

(1998) 3 SCC 309

\"Soon before her death\" in S.113B IEA (now S.113 BSA) does not require cruelty on the day of death; continuous cruelty persisting up to or near death satisfies the requirement.

evidence-lawpresumptiondowry-deathsection-113Bsoon-before-deathcrueltysection-304B
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1998

Special Reference No. 1 of 1998 (Third Judges case)

(1998) 7 Supreme Court Cases 739; All India Reporter 1999 Supreme Court 1

The Chief Justice of India must form his opinion in consultation with a collegium of the four senior-most Judges of the Supreme Court for appointments to that Court, and the two senior-most for appointments to and transfers from the High Courts. An opinion formed without such consultation is not binding on the Government.

constitutional-lawarticle-124article-217article-222article-143collegiumthird-judges-casejudicial-appointments
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1998

Supreme Court Bar Association v Union of India

(1998) 4 Supreme Court Cases 409; All India Reporter 1998 Supreme Court 1895

Article 142 confers a power of wide amplitude to do complete justice between parties, but it cannot be used to supplant substantive law or to ignore express statutory provisions dealing with the subject. The Court cannot exercise a jurisdiction which a statute vests exclusively in another authority.

constitutional-lawarticle-142article-129complete-justicecontemptadvocates-actlimits-of-power
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1998

Uptron India Ltd. v. Shammi Bhan

(1998) 6 Supreme Court Cases 538

Back wages are not automatic upon reinstatement; Tribunal must consider whether worker was gainfully employed elsewhere during dispute period

back-wagesreinstatementintervening-employmentpartial-back-wages
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1998

Whirlpool Corporation v Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai

(1998) 8 Supreme Court Cases 1; All India Reporter 1999 Supreme Court 22

The existence of an alternative statutory remedy is not an absolute bar to a petition under Article 226. The rule requiring its exhaustion is one of self-imposed restraint and discretion, and three exceptions are recognised: enforcement of a fundamental right, violation of natural justice, and want of jurisdiction or a challenge to vires.

constitutional-lawarticle-226alternative-remedywrit-jurisdictionnatural-justiceviresself-imposed-restraint
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal

AIR 1997 Supreme Court 610

Eleven mandatory requirements for lawful arrest laid down to prevent custodial violence. Non-compliance renders arrest illegal and entitles compensation.

arrestcustodial-violencearticle-21guidelinesrightsS.47-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
International Court of Justice1997

Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia)

ICJ Reports 1997, p 7

A party cannot unilaterally terminate a treaty on grounds of necessity or fundamental change of circumstances unless strict customary law conditions are met; the treaty continues unless lawfully terminated.

PILtreatiesterminationnecessityrebus-sic-stantibusenvironment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

Harpal Singh v Devinder Singh

(1997) 6 Supreme Court Cases 660

A court has the power under the relevant provisions of the CPC to permit the impounding, return, or inspection of documents produced at trial, and must exercise this power having regard to the genuine evidentiary needs of the parties, the authenticity of the documents, and the interests of justice, rather than mechanically returning or impounding documents without due consideration of their continued relevance to the proceedings.

impounding-of-documentsreturn-of-documentsorder-13-cpcevidentiary-relevance
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

Hikmat Ali Khan v. Ishwar Prasad Arya

(1997) 6 Supreme Court Cases 131

Misappropriation of client money is the gravest form of professional misconduct and warrants removal from the roll of advocates.

professional-ethicsmisappropriationclient-moneyremovaldisciplinary
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (Seven-judge bench)1997

L. Chandra Kumar v Union of India

AIR 1997 Supreme Court 1125; (1997) 3 Supreme Court Cases 261

Power of judicial review under Art. 226/227 is a basic feature of the Constitution; tribunal orders are subject to High Court review; tribunals cannot exclude HC jurisdiction.

ADRtribunalsjudicial-reviewbasic-structureArt-226landmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath

(1997) 1 Supreme Court Cases 388

The public trust doctrine constrains even the state's own formal administrative grants; the state cannot abdicate its trust obligation regarding resources held for public benefit through private lease arrangements. A subsequent 2000 order in the same litigation further imposed compensation calculated by reference to the environmental damage itself, independent of individual claimant loss.

public-trust-doctrineriver-encroachmentenvironmental-compensation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

Miheer H Mafatlal v Mafatlal Industries Ltd

AIR 1997 Supreme Court 506

The court's role in sanctioning a scheme of arrangement is limited to ensuring fairness, lawfulness, and that the class was fairly represented; commercial wisdom of the majority prevails over judicial second-guessing

scheme-of-arrangementNCLTcourt-sanctioncommercial-wisdommajority-creditors
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

Noor Saba Khatoon v Mohd Quasim

(1997) 6 Supreme Court Cases 233; All India Reporter 1997 Supreme Court 3280; judgment of 29 July 1997

Under both personal law and S.125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a Muslim father with sufficient means is under an absolute obligation to maintain his minor children who cannot maintain themselves, until they attain majority or are able to maintain themselves, whichever is earlier, and in the case of daughters until they marry. That obligation is unaffected by the divorced wife's custody of them. S.3(1)(b) of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 operates in a different field: the two year entitlement there is for the mother's own maintenance for nursing or caring for a child, and it does not touch the children's independent right.

muslim-lawmaintenancechildrensection-125-crpc1986-actsection-3-1-bindependent-rightbeneficial-construction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

People's Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India

(1997) 3 Supreme Court Cases 433

Unratified international human rights instruments (such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) can serve as interpretive aids for construing fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution.

PILtransformationICCPRinterpretive-aidArticle-21privacy
Read case brief
Bombay High Court1997

Pragati Varghese v Cyril George Varghese

AIR 1997 Bom 349

The pre-2001 S.10 of the Indian Divorce Act, requiring the wife to prove adultery coupled with another matrimonial offence while the husband could obtain dissolution on adultery alone, violated Art.14; there was no reasonable classification justifying the discrimination.

christian-lawdivorce-act-1869section-10discriminationarticle-14equality2001-amendment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

Prahlad Saran Gupta v Bar Council of India

(1997) 2 Supreme Court Cases 1

The Bar Council of India has appellate jurisdiction over State Bar Council disciplinary orders; its power includes enhancement of punishment.

professional-ethicsdisciplinary-proceedingsbar-council-indiaappellate-jurisdiction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

Ramamurthy v. State of Karnataka

(1997) 2 Supreme Court Cases 642

Nine problems identified in Indian prisons including overcrowding, delayed trials, torture, neglect of health, and lack of legal aid. Directed states to address prison conditions.

prison-reformprisoners-rightsarticle-21nine-problemsconditionssem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

Samatha v State of Andhra Pradesh

AIR 1997 Supreme Court 3297

Transfer of land in Scheduled Areas to non-tribals (including private mining leases) is prohibited; the State and its instrumentalities are bound by the same prohibition

scheduled-areastribal-landsFifth-Schedulemining-leasesnon-tribal-transferPESA
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

State of Rajasthan v. Ani

(1997) 6 SCC 162

Failure to cross-examine a witness on a material point amounts to acceptance of that point; the party cannot later argue in submissions that the fact was not proved.

evidence-lawcross-examinationfailure-to-cross-examinewitness-testimony
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals v CIT

(1997) 227 ITR 172 (Supreme Court)

Interest earned on surplus funds deposited for a short period during setting up of business is assessable as 'Income from Other Sources' and not as a capital receipt.

taxation-lawinterestsurplus-fundspre-commencementother-sources
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1997

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan

AIR 1997 Supreme Court 3011

Unratified international conventions can be used as interpretive aids to fill gaps in domestic law where no contrary legislation exists

international-law-municipal-lawCEDAWsexual-harassmentunratified-treatiesvishaka-guidelinesPILgap-filling
Read case brief
1997

Zippo Manufacturing Co v Zippo Dot Com Inc

952 F. Supp. 1119 (W.D. Pa. 1997)

The 'sliding scale' test for internet jurisdiction: passive websites (information only) = no jurisdiction; interactive websites (commercial transactions) = jurisdiction exists (US).

it-lawinternet-jurisdictionsliding-scale-testpassive-active-websiteus-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1996

D.C. Saxena v Chief Justice of India

(1996) 5 Supreme Court Cases 216

Scandalizing the court or making reckless allegations against judges constitutes contempt; advocates owe a duty of respect to the judiciary.

professional-ethicscontempt-of-courtbar-bench-relationsduty-to-court
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1996

Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India

(1996) 3 Supreme Court Cases 212

Polluting enterprises engaged in inherently hazardous activity must fund the complete, actual cost of remediation, without limitation to a lesser capped compensation measure, and without escape through traditional strict liability exceptions.

polluter-paysabsolute-liabilityremediation-costhazardous-waste
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1996

M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu

AIR 1997 Supreme Court 699 / (1996) 6 Supreme Court Cases 756

State has a constitutional obligation to eliminate child labour in hazardous industries. Prohibition must be accompanied by rehabilitation (education fund, alternative employment for parents).

child-labourhazardous-industriesrehabilitationarticle-24sivakasimatch-factories
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1996

Molly Joseph v George Sebastian

(1996) 6 SCC 337

S.125 CrPC (now S.144 BNSS) is a secular remedy available to all wives irrespective of religion and is concurrent with personal law alimony under the Indian Divorce Act; the two remedies are cumulative.

christian-lawmaintenancesection-125-crpcsection-144-bnsscumulationindian-divorce-act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1996

N.R. Dongre v. Whirlpool Corporation

1996 (16) PTC 583 (SC)

Transborder reputation/goodwill of a foreign trademark is protectable in India even without use or registration in India. A mark that has acquired reputation through international media, advertising spillover, and foreign sales is entitled to passing off protection in India.

transborder-reputationpassing-offforeign-trademarkgoodwillwhirlpoolprior-use
Read case brief
Madhya Pradesh High Court1996

Navin Chandra v. Smt. Kesharbai

AIR 1996 Madhya Pradesh 1

A condition absolutely restraining alienation attached to a gift deed is void under S.10 TPA; donee takes property free of restraint

property-lawTPAsection-10alienationrestraint
Read case brief
1996

ProCD Inc v Zeidenberg

86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996)

Shrink-wrap licenses are enforceable contracts; opening the package and using the software constitutes acceptance of the license terms (US 7th Circuit).

it-lawshrink-wrapsoftware-licenseacceptance-by-useus-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1996

S. Jagannath v. Union of India

(1997) 2 Supreme Court Cases 87

Coastal zone protection requirements carry genuine substantive enforcement force, applicable even against economically significant coastal development activities.

coastal-regulation-zoneshrimp-farmingaquaculture
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1996

State of Andhra Pradesh v Star Bone Mill

(1996) 5 Supreme Court Cases 376

The State can resume lands granted on specific conditions when those conditions are breached; the power of resumption is distinct from and independent of the power of acquisition

resumptionconditions-of-grantbreachland-reformsState-power
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1996

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

(1997) 2 Supreme Court Cases 267 (and continuing orders)

'Forest' should be understood according to its dictionary meaning, encompassing any area with genuine forest ecological character, regardless of formal notification, classification, or ownership status.

forest-conservation-actforest-definitioncontinuing-mandamus
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1996

Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India

(1996) 5 Supreme Court Cases 647

The precautionary principle and polluter pays principle, as part of customary international law, become part of the law of the land where they do not conflict with existing domestic statute.

precautionary-principlepolluter-payscustomary-international-lawtanneries
Read case brief
Kerala High Court1995

Ammini EJ v Union of India

AIR 1995 Ker 252

The pre-2001 S.10 of the Indian Divorce Act, requiring a wife to prove adultery coupled with another matrimonial offence while the husband needed adultery alone, was discriminatory and violated Arts.14 and 15.

christian-lawdivorce-act-1869discriminationarticle-14article-15section-10equality
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

C Ravichandran Iyer v Justice A M Bhattacharjee

(1995) 5 Supreme Court Cases 457

A Bar Association has no authority to sit in judgment on a Judge or to demand his resignation by resolution or by abstention from work. There is a gap between conduct amounting to proved misbehaviour warranting removal and conduct merely unbecoming of judicial office, and that gap is filled by an in-house procedure headed by the Chief Justice of India.

constitutional-lawjudicial-accountabilityin-house-procedurebar-associationarticle-124yawning-gapjudicial-independence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India

(1995) 3 Supreme Court Cases 42

Right to health and medical care at the workplace is a fundamental right under Article 21 (right to life). Employers in hazardous industries (asbestos) must provide health insurance, periodic medical examination, and safe working conditions. Workers' right to know about health hazards is part of Article 21.

right-to-healtharticle-21hazardous-industryasbestosoccupational-safetyhealth-insurance
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Dhananjay Sharma v. State of Haryana

(1995) 3 Supreme Court Cases 757

Collective boycott of a judge by lawyers constitutes criminal contempt as it interferes with the administration of justice.

professional-ethicsboycottcontemptbar-benchcriminal-contempt
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. v. Coca-Cola Co.

(1995) 5 Supreme Court Cases 545

Affirmed the Dalpat Kumar three-condition test for temporary injunction. Added that while deciding balance of convenience, the court must weigh relative hardship to each party. Status quo has evidentiary weight but is not determinative.

CPCtemporary-injunctionorder-XXXIXbalance-of-conveniencerelative-hardshipstatus-quo
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. Ashok Vishnu Kate

(1995) 6 Supreme Court Cases 326

Employing workers as badli/temporary for years while they perform permanent nature duties constitutes unfair labour practice; such workers must be regularized

ULPtemporary-workersregularization240-dayspermanent-nature-duties
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Indian Medical Association v. V.P. Shantha

(1995) 6 Supreme Court Cases 651

Medical services generally constitute 'service' under the Consumer Protection Act where rendered for consideration, though entirely free medical services generally fall outside its scope given the absence of consideration.

medical-negligenceconsumer-protection-actservice-definition
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

LIC of India v Consumer Education and Research Centre

(1995) 5 Supreme Court Cases 482

Right to health and medical care is a fundamental right under Article 21; the State and its instrumentalities must ensure workers' health in hazardous industries.

constitutional-lawarticle-21right-to-healthworkers-rightsdirective-principles
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Mahboob Sahab v Syed Ismail

(1995) 3 Supreme Court Cases 693; All India Reporter 1995 Supreme Court 1205; judgment of 23 March 1995

Although a gift by a Muslim need not be in writing and need not be registered, to be complete there must be a declaration of gift by the donor, acceptance express or implied by or on behalf of the donee, and delivery of possession actual or constructive; where the donor is in possession of immovable property he must completely divest himself physically of the subject of the gift. Under Muhammadan law a mother can neither act as nor be appointed property guardian or legal guardian of her minor child. The operative disposal turned on res judicata between co defendants and on fraud and collusion under S.44 of the Evidence Act.

muslim-lawgifthibathree-essentialsdelivery-of-possessionmother-not-guardianres-judicatafraud
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Mangat Mal (Dead) by LRs and Anr. v Smt. Punni Devi and Anr.

(1995) 6 Supreme Court Cases 88

An affidavit filed in support of an application or as evidence in proceedings must comply with the requirements of Order XIX CPC and be based on facts within the deponent's personal knowledge, or clearly identify the source of information and belief where the statement is not based on personal knowledge; an affidavit that fails to distinguish between knowledge and belief, or is otherwise vague, is of diminished evidentiary value and can be disregarded by the court.

affidavitorder-19-cpcpersonal-knowledgebeliefevidentiary-value
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v Krishna Kant

(1995) 5 Supreme Court Cases 75

Where a dispute involves rights and obligations created purely under the general law of contract or common law, and does not involve rights specifically created under the Industrial Disputes Act, a civil court may retain jurisdiction; but where the dispute concerns rights and obligations that are created by, or find their source in, the Industrial Disputes Act or the underlying industrial relations framework (such as disputes over termination, standing orders, or related matters), the civil court's jurisdiction is ordinarily excluded, and the matter must go through the industrial adjudication machinery.

civil-court-jurisdictionexclusionindustrial-adjudicationstanding-orders
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Re: Vinay Chandra Mishra

(1995) 2 Supreme Court Cases 584

Supreme Court retains inherent power under Art. 129 to suspend an advocate from practice for contempt, independent of the Bar Council's disciplinary jurisdiction.

professional-ethicscontemptsuspensionbar-benchsupreme-courtart-129
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Romesh Chander v Savitri

(1995) 2 Supreme Court Cases 7

Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and there is no possibility of the parties coming together, the Supreme Court may exercise its power under Article 142 to dissolve the marriage even in the absence of a proved statutory ground, as forcing parties to remain tied in a dead marriage serves no social purpose.

divorceirretrievable-breakdownarticle-142crueltydead-marriage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Sarla Mudgal v Union of India

(1995) 3 Supreme Court Cases 635

A Hindu husband cannot convert to Islam solely to contract a second marriage; such a marriage is void under S.494 IPC and Hindu Marriage Act; reiterated the need for a Uniform Civil Code under Article 44.

family-lawbigamyconversionuniform-civil-codearticle-44hindu-marriage-act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

T N Seshan v Union of India

(1995) 4 Supreme Court Cases 611

A multi-member Election Commission is consistent with Article 324(2). The Chief Election Commissioner is not superior in authority to the other Election Commissioners and they are not subordinate to him; his position under Article 324(3) is that of Chairman, and business is transacted by unanimity or by majority.

constitutional-lawarticle-324election-commissionmulti-memberchief-election-commissionerchairmanremovalindependence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1995

Vidya Devi v Prem Prakash

AIR 1995 Supreme Court 2286

Unregistered sale deed cannot transfer title to immoveable property; may evidence agreement to sell for specific performance

property-lawsaleregistrationsection-54unregistered-deed
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

Ashok Gas Service v Indian Oil Corporation

(1994) 2 Comp LJ 182

The doctrine of indoor management (Turquand's rule) applies in India; persons dealing with a company in good faith may assume regularity of internal proceedings

indoor-managementturquand-ruleindian-applicationgood-faithinternal-procedure
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

Dhananjay Chatterjee v. State of WB

(1994) 2 Supreme Court Cases 220

Parole/furlough is a privilege, not a right, granted by the executive based on good conduct and specified grounds. Arbitrary denial is challengeable under Art. 14.

parolefurloughprivilegeexecutive-discretionarticle-14sem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (five Judge Constitution Bench)1994

Dr M Ismail Faruqui v Union of India

(1994) 6 Supreme Court Cases 360; All India Reporter 1995 Supreme Court 605(A); judgment of 24 October 1994

S.4(3) of the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act 1993, which abated all pending suits relating to the disputed area, is unconstitutional and invalid because abating suits without providing an alternative dispute resolution mechanism extinguishes the judicial remedy and negates the rule of law; the provision is severable and the rest of the Act is valid. Irrespective of the status of a mosque under Muslim law in Islamic countries, the status of a mosque under the Mahomedan law applicable in secular India is the same and equal to that of any other place of worship of any religion, and it does not enjoy any greater immunity from acquisition under the sovereign power of the State.

muslim-lawwaqfmosqueacquisitionarticle-25article-26essential-religious-practiceayodhya
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

ESIC v. R.K. Swamy

AIR 1994 Supreme Court 1754

Persons working through a contractor but under the principal employer's supervision and control are employees under Section 2(9) of the ESI Act.

ESIcontract-labourprincipal-employersupervisionsection-2-9
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

Joginder Kumar v. State of UP

AIR 1994 Supreme Court 1349

Arrest must be justified; right to inform friend/relative and right to consult lawyer apply. Personal liberty demands restraint in exercise of arrest power.

arrestpersonal-libertyrightsarticle-21article-22sem-5
Read case brief
Madras High Court1994

Kalyanasundaram v Kasiammal

AIR 1994 Madras 283

Unregistered gift deed of immoveable property is void and confers no title; registration is mandatory under S.123

property-lawgiftregistrationsection-123unregisteredvoid
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab

(1994) 3 Supreme Court Cases 569

Even in special anti-terrorism legislation, basic fair trial safeguards cannot be eliminated. Accused must have right to legal representation, cross-examination, knowledge of charges, speedy trial, and protection against self-incrimination.

fair-trialTADAterrorismarticle-21special-legislationsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

Lucknow Development Authority v M.K. Gupta

(1994) 1 Supreme Court Cases 243

Statutory authorities providing housing are providers of 'services' under consumer protection law; deficiency in service by a development authority is actionable before consumer forums.

tort-lawconsumer-protectiondeficiency-of-servicehousingdevelopment-authority
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

N. Nagendra Rao & Co. v. State of Andhra Pradesh

AIR 1994 Supreme Court 2663

Sovereign immunity confined to 'primary and inalienable' functions only (defense, foreign affairs); State liable for negligent storage of seized goods. Substantially narrows Kasturi Lal.

administrative-lawstate-liabilitysovereign-immunitynarrowingwelfare-state
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

Premji Ratansey Shah v. Union of India

(1994) 2 Supreme Court Cases 71

A receiver cannot act in excess of the powers conferred by the court's order. Acts outside the court order are void, and the receiver is personally liable for damages caused by such unauthorised acts.

CPCreceiverorder-XLpowers-of-receiverultra-virespersonal-liability
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

Ravi S Naik v Union of India

1994 Supplementary (2) Supreme Court Cases 641; All India Reporter 1994 Supreme Court 1558

The expression 'voluntarily gives up his membership' in Paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule has a wider connotation than resignation. In the absence of a formal resignation, the conclusion that a member has voluntarily given up his membership may be drawn from his conduct.

constitutional-lawanti-defectiontenth-schedulevoluntarily-giving-upconductdisqualificationspeaker
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

S.R. Bommai v Union of India

(1994) 3 Supreme Court Cases 1

Presidential proclamation under Article 356 is subject to judicial review; secularism is a basic feature of the Constitution; floor test is the proper method to determine majority.

constitutional-lawarticle-356secularismbasic-structurepresidents-rulejudicial-review
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

State of U.P. v. Hazratbal Waqf

(1994) 5 Supreme Court Cases 718

The CPC applies uniformly to all civil courts. Special statutes may exclude it, but exclusion must be express or clearly implied. An alternative forum alone does not oust CPC application.

CPCuniform-applicationspecial-statuteexclusionexpress-or-implied
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

Tata Cellular v. Union of India

AIR 1994 Supreme Court 11

Judicial review of government commercial/contractual decisions limited to Wednesbury grounds; court will not sit in appeal over commercial wisdom

administrative-lawjudicial-reviewwednesburygovernment-contractstelecom
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1994

V. Bhagat v D. Bhagat

(1994) 1 Supreme Court Cases 337

Mental cruelty as a ground for divorce must be of such a nature that it causes reasonable apprehension in the petitioner's mind that it would be harmful or injurious to live with the respondent; unsubstantiated and wild allegations of adultery, dowry demand, or criminal conduct in written statements or pleadings may themselves constitute mental cruelty.

divorcecrueltymental-crueltysection-13false-allegations
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1993

Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta

(1994) 1 Supreme Court Cases 243

The Consumer Protection Act is beneficial legislation; "service" must be read broadly to include statutory and public authorities

beneficial-constructionconsumer-protectionservice-definitionpublic-authoritystatutory-body
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1993

Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad v B Karunakar

(1993) 4 Supreme Court Cases 727; All India Reporter 1994 Supreme Court 1074

Where the inquiry officer is a person other than the disciplinary authority, a copy of the inquiry report must be furnished to the delinquent servant before the penalty is decided, as part of the reasonable opportunity under Article 311(2). Relief for non-supply depends on the servant establishing prejudice, and the ordinary course is to remit rather than to quash.

constitutional-lawarticle-311inquiry-reportnatural-justiceprejudicedisciplinary-proceedingsremitservices
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1993

Nilabati Behera v State of Orissa

(1993) 2 Supreme Court Cases 746; All India Reporter 1993 Supreme Court 1960

A claim in public law for compensation for contravention of a fundamental right is distinct from and in addition to the private law remedy in tort. It rests on the State's strict liability for the breach, and the defence of sovereign immunity is inapplicable to it. Articles 32 and 226 include the power to award compensation.

constitutional-lawconstitutional-tortarticle-32article-21custodial-deathsovereign-immunitycompensationpublic-law-remedy
Read case brief
House of Lords1993

Pepper v. Hart

[1993] Appeal Cases 593

Courts may refer to Hansard (Parliamentary debates) as an aid to statutory interpretation where legislation is ambiguous, the material relied on consists of clear ministerial statements, and it would prevent injustice.

external-aidshansardparliamentary-debatesambiguityministerial-statement
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1993

Pritam Pal v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh

(1993) Supp 1 Supreme Court Cases 529

Contempt of court must be distinguished from fair criticism. Contempt jurisdiction exists to protect administration of justice, not the personal dignity of judges. Scandalizing the court as a whole by imputing motives or bias undermines public confidence and constitutes criminal contempt.

contemptadministration-of-justicefair-criticismArt-19sem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1993

S V Chandra Pandian v S V Sivalinga Nadar

(1993) 1 Supreme Court Cases 589

All property brought into the stock of the firm or acquired for it becomes the property of the firm. During subsistence no partner can claim any earmarked portion of it; his interest is undefined and fluctuating. On dissolution the whole must be converted into money under Section 48 and the residue divided, so a partner's share is movable property and its distribution needs no registration.

partnershipsection-14section-48dissolutionfirm-propertysettlement-of-accountsregistration
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1993

State of AP v. Punati Ramulu

(1993) Supp 2 Supreme Court Cases 547

Delay in FIR registration does not by itself discredit prosecution; but unexplained delay creates suspicion of fabrication. Delay must be satisfactorily explained.

FIRdelayexplanationprosecutionfabricationsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1993

Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v Union of India (Second Judges case)

(1993) 4 Supreme Court Cases 441; All India Reporter 1994 Supreme Court 268

In the matter of appointment of Judges, 'consultation' in Articles 124(2) and 217(1) means concurrence, and the opinion of the Chief Justice of India has primacy. The Chief Justice must form that opinion in consultation with his senior colleagues, which is the origin of the collegium. S P Gupta overruled on this point.

constitutional-lawarticle-124article-217article-222collegiumjudicial-appointmentsjudicial-independencesecond-judges-case
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1993

Unni Krishnan, J.P. and Ors. v State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.

(1993) 1 Supreme Court Cases 645

The right to education up to the age of fourteen is a fundamental right flowing from Art.21, read with Art.45 (Directive Principle); beyond that age, the right is subject to the state's economic capacity. This directly led to the insertion of Art.21A by the 86th Amendment.

right-to-educationarticle-21article-45article-21aharmonious-construction
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1992

Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police

[1992] 1 Appeal Cases 310

Recovery for secondary victims requires genuine direct perception of the event or its immediate aftermath; witnessing through mediated broadcast generally does not satisfy this requirement.

nervous-shocksecondary-victimproximityhillsborough
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh

AIR 1993 Supreme Court 276; (1992) 1 Supreme Court Cases 719

Three conditions must be satisfied for grant of temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2: (1) prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience in favour of the applicant, and (3) irreparable injury if injunction is not granted. All three must coexist.

CPCtemporary-injunctionorder-XXXIXprima-facie-casebalance-of-convenienceirreparable-injurythree-conditions
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

Deena Nath v. National Fertilizers Ltd.

AIR 1992 Supreme Court 457

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applies to all employees who have completed 5 years of continuous service. Termination of service for any reason (including retrenchment) does not disentitle an employee from gratuity if the qualifying period is met. Forfeiture under Section 4(6) applies only for specific acts of misconduct.

gratuitycontinuous-serviceforfeitureretrenchmentsection-4
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (Nine-Judge Bench)1992

Indra Sawhney and Ors. v Union of India and Ors. (Mandal Commission case)

AIR 1993 Supreme Court 477

Reservations for socially and educationally backward classes under Article 16(4) cannot exceed 50 percent; the 'creamy layer' among backward classes must be excluded; caste can be a valid criterion but not the sole criterion for identifying backward classes.

article-16-4mandal-commissioncreamy-layer50-percent-ceilingreservation-in-promotion
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

Kihoto Hollohan v Zachillhu

(1992) Supplementary (2) Supreme Court Cases 651; All India Reporter 1993 Supreme Court 412

The Tenth Schedule is valid except Paragraph 7, which was struck down for want of ratification under Article 368(2) because it affected the powers of the Supreme Court and the High Courts. The Speaker deciding under Paragraph 6 acts as a tribunal, so the decision is reviewable on narrow grounds and only after it is made.

constitutional-lawanti-defectiontenth-schedulearticle-368ratificationseverabilityspeaker-as-tribunaljudicial-review
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

Ramesh Hirachand Kundanmal v Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay

AIR 1992 Supreme Court 2005

A 'necessary party' is one without whom no effective order or decree can be made in a suit, whereas a 'proper party' is one whose presence, though not indispensable, enables the court to more effectually and completely adjudicate on the matter; a suit cannot fail merely for non-joinder of a proper party, and courts should exercise their discretion under Order I Rule 10 to add parties rather than dismiss proceedings on technical grounds of misjoinder or non-joinder.

necessary-partyproper-partyorder-1-rule-10non-joindermisjoinder
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

St. Stephen's College v University of Delhi

(1992) 1 Supreme Court Cases 558

A minority educational institution under Art.30(1) has the right to prefer students of its own community in admissions, up to a reasonable percentage (fixed at 50 percent), provided admission is based on merit and the institution's autonomy is exercised without arbitrariness.

article-30minority-institutionsadmission-autonomyreservation-cap
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

State Bank of India v Indexport Registered

(1992) 3 Supreme Court Cases 159; All India Reporter 1992 Supreme Court 1740

Where a composite decree is passed against the principal debtor and the guarantor, the decree-holder may execute it against the guarantor without first exhausting execution against the mortgaged property of the principal debtor.

guaranteesuretysection-128executioncomposite-decreemortgaged-property
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal

1992 Supp (1) Supreme Court Cases 335

Seven categories enumerated where High Court may quash FIR/criminal proceedings under S.482 CrPC (now S.528 BNSS) to prevent abuse of process.

quashinginherent-powersS.528-BNSSFIRabuse-of-processsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

State of Maharashtra v. Sukhdeo Singh

(1992) 3 Supreme Court Cases 700

A judgment must contain the points for determination, the decision thereon, and the reasons for the decision. The judgment must be a self-contained document that demonstrates application of mind. A judgment that does not address the material evidence or record reasons is vitiated.

judgmentreasoningS.354-CrPCS.392-BNSSpoints-for-determinationsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

Syndicate Bank v. Vijay Kumar

1992 Allahabad India Reporter, Supreme Court 1066

Banking activities constitute 'service' under Consumer Protection Act; deficiency in banking service is actionable before consumer forums

banking-serviceconsumer-protectiondeficiency-of-servicebanking-relationship
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1992

Workmen of Reptakos Brett & Co. v. Reptakos Brett & Co.

(1992) 1 Supreme Court Cases 290 / AIR 1992 Supreme Court 504

Minimum wage must include a sixth component (25% addition) for children's education, medical needs, and recreation beyond the four norms of the 15th Indian Labour Conference.

minimum-wagesixth-component15th-ILCchildren-educationneed-based-minimum-wage
Read case brief
Patna High Court1991

Abdul Manan Khan v Mirtuza Khan

All India Reporter 1991 Patna 154; judgment of 8 February 1990

A bequest in favour of an heir is invalid unless the other heirs consent after the testator's death. The one third limit is not displaced merely because all the heirs happen to be beneficiaries, since sons and daughters do not take equal shares on intestacy and the rule would otherwise be easy to evade. Consent must be given after death, since before death it is unknown who the heirs will be and in what shares. Consent by some heirs only binds those consenting, and the excess legacy is payable out of their shares. Consent need not be express and may be inferred from conduct.

muslim-lawwillswasiyatbequeathable-thirdbequest-to-heirconsent-of-heirsimplied-consentmulla-article-117
Read case brief
1991

Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service

499 U.S. 340 (1991)

Facts and data in a compilation are not copyrightable; copyright requires a minimum degree of creativity in selection and arrangement (US Supreme Court, 'sweat of the brow' rejected).

it-lawdatabase-protectioncopyrightcreativitysweat-of-brow
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1991

K Veeraswami v Union of India

(1991) 3 Supreme Court Cases 655; All India Reporter 1991 Supreme Court 1954

A Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court is a public servant within the Prevention of Corruption Act and may be prosecuted. Article 124(4) provides a mode of removal and confers no immunity from the criminal law. But no criminal case may be registered against such a Judge without prior consultation with and sanction of the Chief Justice of India.

constitutional-lawjudicial-accountabilityarticle-124prevention-of-corruptionpublic-servantsanctionchief-justice-of-india
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1991

Khujji v. State of Madhya Pradesh

(1991) 3 SCC 627

A previous inconsistent statement proved to contradict a witness is not substantive evidence of the facts stated; it can only be used to impeach credibility.

evidence-lawprevious-inconsistent-statementimpeachmentsection-155credibility
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1991

Louis De Raedt v Union of India

(1991) 3 SCC 554

Prolonged residence in India raises a strong presumption of the intention to remain permanently (animus manendi), but residence alone is not conclusive of domicile; the totality of circumstances must be assessed.

domicileanimusresidenceforeign-nationalprolonged-residencedeportation
Read case brief
High Court1991

Madhusree Leasing v Registrar of Companies

(1991) 71 Company Cases 518

Failure to register transfer of shares within the prescribed 30-day period attracts penalty under the Companies Act; the statutory timeline is mandatory.

transfer-of-sharesregistration-delaypenaltystatutory-timeline
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1991

Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar

AIR 1991 Supreme Court 420

The right to life under Article 21 includes the right to enjoyment of pollution-free water and air.

environmental-lawarticle-21right-to-clean-environment
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1990

Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman

[1990] 2 Appeal Cases 605

A three-stage test governs duty of care in novel situations: foreseeability of harm, sufficient proximity between the parties, and whether imposing a duty is fair, just, and reasonable.

negligenceduty-of-carecaparo-testproximity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1990

Som Raj v. State of Haryana

AIR 1990 Supreme Court 1176

Rule of Law demands every State action conform to fair, just, and reasonable procedure; administrative order without statutory procedure is void

administrative-lawrule-of-lawprocedural-compliancearbitrariness
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1989

A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v A.P. Agencies, Salem

AIR 1989 Supreme Court 1239

Where a contract contains a clause specifying that disputes shall be subject to the jurisdiction of a particular court, and more than one court would otherwise have jurisdiction under Section 20 CPC based on the facts, such an exclusive jurisdiction clause is valid and binding on the parties, provided the chosen court is one that would, in any event, have jurisdiction under the general law; parties cannot, however, confer jurisdiction on a court that would otherwise have none.

jurisdiction-clauseexclusive-jurisdictionouster-clausesection-20-cpc
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1989

B.R. Singh v. Union of India

(1989) 4 Supreme Court Cases 710

Strike is not a fundamental right but is recognized as a legitimate weapon of workers for collective bargaining; regulable by legislature

strikelegitimate-weaponESMAessential-servicesArt-19
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1989

Kehar Singh v. Union of India

AIR 1989 Supreme Court 653

President's power to grant pardon under Art. 72 is of the widest amplitude. The President can examine the case on merits independent of judicial findings.

pardonarticle-72presidential-powermercydeath-penaltysem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1989

Re: An Advocate

AIR 1989 Supreme Court 245

Persistent filing of frivolous cases and misleading the court constitutes professional misconduct; the court can refer the advocate to the Bar Council for disciplinary action.

professional-ethicsfrivolous-litigationmisconductdisciplinary-reference
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1989

State of Andhra Pradesh v P Laxmi Devi

AIR 1989 Supreme Court 1730

Land ceiling laws imposing a ceiling on agricultural holdings are constitutionally valid as a measure of agrarian reform; exemptions must be strictly construed

ceiling-lawsagricultural-holdingsland-reformsconstitutional-validityexemptions
Read case brief
Calcutta High Court1989

Swapna Ghosh v Sadananda Ghosh

AIR 1989 Cal 1

A married woman living separately from her husband may acquire an independent domicile of choice; the old common law rule of dependent domicile is abandoned.

domicilemarried-womanindependent-domiciledomicile-of-choiceconflict-of-laws
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1989

Union Carbide Corporation v Union of India

(1989) 1 Supreme Court Cases 674

Mass disaster litigation can be settled by the Supreme Court acting parens patriae; absolute liability of hazardous industries affirmed in the Bhopal gas tragedy context.

tort-lawabsolute-liabilitybhopal-gas-tragedymass-tortparens-patriaehazardous-industry
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1988

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Ganga Pollution Case)

AIR 1988 Supreme Court 1037

Courts can retain continuing jurisdiction (continuing mandamus) over environmental matters requiring sustained monitoring and successive orders, rather than a single conclusive judgment.

environmental-lawcontinuing-mandamusriver-pollutionarticle-21ganga
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1988

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Kanpur Tanneries Case)

AIR 1988 Supreme Court 1037 (within the broader Ganga Pollution litigation)

Closure is an appropriate, and sometimes necessary, remedy for non-compliance with orders to install effluent treatment, given the insufficiency of financial penalties alone in some circumstances.

river-pollutionclosure-ordertanneriesganga
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1988

Modula India v. Kamakhya Singh

(1988) 4 Supreme Court Cases 619

An evasive denial in a written statement is treated as an admission under Order VIII Rule 5. Where the defendant merely says an allegation is 'not admitted' without giving any explanation or counter-facts, the denial is evasive and the allegation is deemed admitted.

CPCwritten-statementevasive-denialspecific-denialorder-VIII-rule-5admissiondeemed-admitted
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1988

Sunil Kumar v Ram Prakash

AIR 1988 Supreme Court 576

A Karta of a joint Hindu family can enter into a valid partition arrangement or family settlement binding on minor coparceners, provided it is bona fide and for the benefit of the family, without requiring prior court sanction in every case.

kartapowers-of-kartafamily-settlementminor-coparcenerjoint-family
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1987

Canara Bank v. Canara Sales Corporation

(1987) 2 Supreme Court Cases 666

Bank owes a qualified fiduciary duty to customer including secrecy, good faith, and non-exploitation of confidential information

fiduciary-dutysecrecybanker-customergood-faithconfidentiality
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1987

Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji

(1987) 2 Supreme Court Cases 107; AIR 1987 Supreme Court 1353

Courts should adopt a liberal approach toward condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Substantial justice should be preferred over technicality. Refusing condonation for a short delay without substantial reason defeats the purpose of the right of appeal.

limitation-actsection-5condonation-of-delaysufficient-causeliberal-approachsubstantial-justice
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1987

Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Ltd. v Audrey D'Costa

AIR 1987 Supreme Court 1281

Under the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, the test for determining whether male and female employees are performing 'same or similar work' is a functional one: what matters is the nature and substance of the work actually performed, not the formal job title or designation assigned to the post; where the work performed is substantially similar in nature, skill, and responsibility, differential pay based on sex-linked designations or classifications violates the Act.

equal-remuneration-actsame-or-similar-workfunctional-testgender-pay-parity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1987

MC Mehta v Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak)

AIR 1987 Supreme Court 1086

Enterprises engaged in inherently dangerous activities owe ABSOLUTE liability, no defences available; damages proportional to magnitude of enterprise

absolute-liabilitystrict-liabilityhazardous-activityenterprise-liabilityindian-lawfoundational
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1987

MC Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak)

AIR 1987 Supreme Court 1086

An enterprise engaged in inherently dangerous activity is absolutely liable for harm caused, with no exceptions (no act of God, no third-party defence, no consent). Compensation must be proportionate to the magnitude and financial capacity of the enterprise.

absolute-liabilityoleum-gasshriram-industrieshazardous-activityart-21compensation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1987

S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India

AIR 1987 Supreme Court 386

Administrative Tribunal (CAT) is valid substitute for HC in service matters provided independence, competence, and judicial approach are maintained

administrative-lawtribunalsCATart-323Aindependencealternative-mechanism
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1987

Sheonandan Paswan v. State of Bihar

AIR 1987 Supreme Court 877

PP must exercise independent judgment in seeking withdrawal. It must not be mechanical rubber-stamping of executive directions. Court must be satisfied withdrawal serves public interest.

prosecutionwithdrawalS.321independencepublic-interestsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1986

Central Inland Water Transport Corp v. Brojo Nath Ganguly

AIR 1986 Supreme Court 1571

Standard form contract terms that are unconscionable, unreasonable, and the product of grossly unequal bargaining power may be struck down as opposed to public policy, even absent traditional vitiating factors like fraud or coercion.

standard-form-contractunconscionabilityunequal-bargaining-powerpublic-policy
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1986

Mary Roy v State of Kerala

AIR 1986 SC 1011

The Indian Succession Act 1925 applies uniformly to all Indian Christians, displacing the Travancore Christian Succession Act 1916; daughters inherit equally with sons.

christian-lawsuccessionindian-succession-actequalitytravancoredaughters-share
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1986

Sheela Barse v. Union of India

AIR 1986 Supreme Court 1773

No child shall be kept in jail or police lockup. Separate homes with education and rehabilitation must be provided for juvenile offenders.

juvenile-justicechildrenarticle-21institutional-caresem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1986

State of Kerala v Mathai Verghese

AIR 1987 Supreme Court 33

Exemptions under land ceiling legislation must be strictly construed; any person claiming exemption must strictly satisfy the statutory conditions without reliance on liberal interpretation

ceiling-lawsexemptionsstrict-constructionKeralaland-reforms
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1985

Balmer Lawrie Workers' Union v Balmer Lawrie and Co. Ltd.

AIR 1985 Supreme Court 311

Trade union recognition and the determination of which union represents workers in collective bargaining must be based on objective criteria, such as membership strength verified through a fair process, not on the employer's unilateral preference.

trade-union-recognitioncollective-bargainingmembership-verification
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1985

Bhim Singh v. State of J&K

AIR 1986 Supreme Court 494

Deliberate, improperly motivated unlawful detention warrants exemplary damages beyond ordinary compensatory damages, given the serious character of this abuse of power.

false-imprisonmentexemplary-damagesmala-fide-detentionarticle-21
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1985

Jordan Diengdeh v S.S. Chopra

AIR 1985 Supreme Court 935

The Supreme Court recommended that irretrievable breakdown of marriage should be made a ground for divorce under all matrimonial statutes; the existing grounds, framed around the matrimonial-offence theory, often compel parties to remain trapped in dead marriages.

divorceirretrievable-breakdownlaw-reformmatrimonial-offence-theory
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1985

Mohd. Ahmed Khan v Shah Bano Begum

AIR 1985 Supreme Court 945

A divorced Muslim woman is entitled to maintenance under S.125 CrPC (now S.144 BNSS) even after the iddat period if she is unable to maintain herself; the secular provision of maintenance applies to all women irrespective of religion.

maintenancesection-125-crpcmuslim-lawuniform-civil-codedivorced-muslim-woman
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1985

Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation

AIR 1986 Supreme Court 180

Right to livelihood is part of Art.21; pavement dwellers cannot be evicted without notice and hearing; Rule of Law extends to the most vulnerable.

art-21right-to-livelihoodpavement-dwellersnatural-justicePILrule-of-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1985

Union of India v Tulsiram Patel

(1985) 3 Supreme Court Cases 398; All India Reporter 1985 Supreme Court 1416

Where a proviso to Article 311(2) is validly invoked, the inquiry and with it the right to a hearing are excluded by the Constitution itself, and natural justice cannot be pleaded to restore them. But the satisfaction must rest on relevant material and be reached in good faith, and despite Article 311(3) it remains open to judicial review for mala fides, absence of material or extraneous grounds.

constitutional-lawarticle-311provisosnatural-justicenot-reasonably-practicablejudicial-review42nd-amendmentdismissal
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1984

Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India

(1984) 3 Supreme Court Cases 161

Bonded labour violates Arts.21 and 23; State has positive obligation to identify, release, and rehabilitate bonded labourers.

landmarkbonded-labourArt-21Art-23PILpositive-obligation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1984

Ghanshyam Das v. Dominion of India

AIR 1984 Supreme Court 1004

A decision to be a 'decree' under Section 2(2) CPC must satisfy three conditions: (1) it must be a formal expression, (2) it must be an adjudication, and (3) it must conclusively determine rights of parties. Administrative or ministerial orders of court do not qualify as decrees.

CPCdecreesection-2-2formal-expressionadjudicationconclusive-determination
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1984

Gopinath Ghosh v. State of WB

AIR 1984 Supreme Court 237

The court has a duty to inquire into the age of the accused suo motu if there is any indication of juvenility. It is not merely the right of the accused but the obligation of the court.

juvenile-justiceage-inquirycourt-dutysuo-motusem-5
Read case brief
Gauhati High Court1984

Md Hesabuddin v Md Hesaruddin

All India Reporter 1984 Gauhati 41; judgment of 12 May 1983

S.129 of the Transfer of Property Act takes Muslim gifts out of Chapter VII including S.123, so the requirement of a registered instrument does not apply. The three essentials of a valid gift are declaration, acceptance and delivery of possession, actual or constructive, and no written document is required. Where a writing merely records the declaration rather than constituting the gift, S.17 of the Registration Act does not require it to be registered; the facts of each case determine whether the writing is a formal instrument creating the gift or a mere record of it.

muslim-lawgifthibawriting-not-requiredregistrationsection-129-tpasection-17-registration-actsubstance-over-form
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1984

Pradeep Jain v Union of India

AIR 1984 SC 1420

Domicile and residence requirements for educational admissions must be reasonable; the case is cited in family law for its discussion of domicile as a connecting factor and the distinction between domicile and mere residence.

domicileresidenceconnecting-factoreducational-admissionsconstitutional-law
Read case brief
Madras High Court1984

Ramanuja Mudali v. M. Gangan

AIR 1984 Madras 103

The defensive response must remain proportionate to the actual threat faced; excessive force exceeding what was genuinely necessary is not justified as private defence.

private-defenceproportionalitydefences
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1984

Saroj Rani v Sudarshan Kumar Chadha

AIR 1984 Supreme Court 1562

Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (restitution of conjugal rights) is constitutionally valid; it does not violate Article 21, since its object is to preserve the marriage by encouraging cohabitation, and it does not involve forcible sexual cohabitation as such.

restitution-of-conjugal-rightssection-9-hmaarticle-21constitutional-validity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1984

Workmen of Hindustan Lever Ltd. v Hindustan Lever Ltd.

AIR 1984 Supreme Court 516

A settlement or award reached in the course of conciliation or adjudication must be interpreted in light of its object and the surrounding circumstances at the time it was made; awards and settlements affecting terms of employment are to be construed in favour of preserving industrial harmony and giving effect to the substance of what the parties intended, rather than a rigid literal reading that defeats that purpose.

interpretation-of-awardsettlementindustrial-harmonyconciliation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1983

Chandra Shekhar Soni v Bar Council of Rajasthan

AIR 1983 Supreme Court 1012

Professional misconduct includes acts that bring disrepute to the legal profession even if not connected with professional work; moral turpitude is a ground for removal.

professional-ethicsmisconductmoral-turpituderemoval
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1983

D.S. Nakara v. Union of India

AIR 1983 Supreme Court 130

Beneficial construction combined with Article 14 prohibits arbitrary exclusion of persons clearly within the protected class of a welfare scheme

beneficial-constructionarticle-14pensionwelfare-legislationarbitrary-classification
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1983

Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab

AIR 1983 Supreme Court 957

Five categories of rarest-of-rare cases enumerated: manner of commission (extreme brutality), motive (total depravity), anti-social nature, magnitude of crime, personality of victim.

death-penaltyrarest-of-rarecategoriessentencingsem-5
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1983

McLoughlin v. O'Brian

[1983] 1 Appeal Cases 410

Secondary victims must establish close ties of love and affection with the primary victim, close physical and temporal proximity to the event or its immediate aftermath, and direct perception through their own senses.

nervous-shocksecondary-victimproximitynegligence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1983

Sanjit Roy v State of Rajasthan

AIR 1983 Supreme Court 328

Payment of wages below the statutorily prescribed minimum wage to workers engaged on famine relief or drought relief works amounts to forced labour within the meaning of Article 23 of the Constitution, and cannot be justified merely because the work is offered as relief during a scarcity or emergency; the state cannot use economic distress as a ground to pay less than minimum wages.

article-23forced-labourminimum-wagesfamine-relief-work
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1983

Shree Shakti Mills Ltd v CIT

AIR 1983 Supreme Court 1039

Transfer of shares is complete only upon registration: entry of transferee's name in the register of members; mere execution of transfer deed is insufficient

share-transferregistrationcompletionregister-of-memberstitle
Read case brief
Andhra Pradesh High Court1983

T. Sareetha v T. Venkata Subbaiah

AIR 1983 Andhra Pradesh 356

Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (restitution of conjugal rights) was held unconstitutional as violative of the right to privacy and human dignity under Article 21, because it compels cohabitation and sexual relations against a person's will; this view was later overturned by the Supreme Court in Saroj Rani v Sudarshan Kumar Chadha (1984).

restitution-of-conjugal-rightssection-9-hmaarticle-21privacyoverruled
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1983

Thippaswamy v. State of Karnataka

(1983) 1 Supreme Court Cases 194

Plea bargaining, though not formally recognized in statute at the time, was acknowledged as a reality. The Court held that a conviction based on a plea of guilty induced by promise of leniency is vitiated. However, where the accused voluntarily pleads guilty for a lesser offence, it serves the interest of justice by reducing delays.

plea-bargainingguilty-pleaS.313-BNSSvoluntary-pleafair-trialsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1982

A.K. Roy v Union of India

AIR 1982 Supreme Court 710

Preventive detention under the National Security Act is constitutional, including exclusion of legal representation before Advisory Boards, but Art.22(5) requires detention grounds to be furnished with sufficient particularity and promptness to enable effective representation.

preventive-detentionarticle-22national-security-actadvisory-boardprocedural-safeguards
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1982

Bishan Chand v Radha Kishan

AIR 1982 Supreme Court 806

Seller's non-disclosure of pending litigation affecting title is breach of S.55(1)(a); buyer entitled to rescission

property-lawsaledisclosurelatent-defectsection-55pending-litigation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1982

Dhanalakshmi v Jinarajadasa

AIR 1982 Supreme Court 169

S.53A is a shield (defence), not a sword (cause of action); does not confer title, only protects possession

property-lawpart-performancesection-53Ashield-not-sword
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1982

Gangabai v. Chhabubai

(1982) 1 SCC 4

S.90 raises a presumption of genuineness (that the document is what it purports to be), not a presumption of truth of contents; contents must be proved separately.

evidence-lawpresumptionancient-documentssection-90genuineness-vs-truthdocumentary-evidence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1982

Randhir Singh v Union of India

AIR 1982 Supreme Court 879

The principle of 'equal pay for equal work,' though not expressly named as a fundamental right in Part III, is deducible from the equality guarantees under Articles 14 and 16, read with the Directive Principle in Article 39(d); persons performing the same or substantially similar duties, functions, and responsibilities are entitled to the same pay scale, absent a rational justification for differentiation.

equal-pay-for-equal-workarticle-14article-16article-39-d
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1982

Reynold Rajamani v Union of India

AIR 1982 SC 1261

Parliament is entitled to enact different grounds of divorce for different communities; the asymmetry in S.10 IDA was upheld at that time as having a rational basis rooted in the structure of Christian matrimonial law.

christian-lawdivorce-act-1869section-10article-14personal-lawlegislative-competence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1982

S.P. Gupta v. Union of India

AIR 1982 Supreme Court 149

Right to know is part of Art.19(1)(a); open government is the norm; locus standi liberalized for PIL

administrative-lawright-to-informationPILlocus-standiart-19transparency
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1982

Sardar Govindrao v. Devi Sahai

AIR 1982 Supreme Court 989

Payment of substantial consideration coupled with delivery of possession constitutes sufficient part performance to invoke S.53A

property-lawTPAsection-53Apart-performanceacts-in-furtherance
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

Air India v. Nergesh Meerza

(1981) 4 Supreme Court Cases 335 / AIR 1981 Supreme Court 1829

Compulsory retirement on first pregnancy is unconstitutional. An employer who permits marriage cannot penalise its natural consequence.

maternitydiscriminationarticle-14article-16termination
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi

AIR 1981 Supreme Court 487

Government control test for determining 'State' under Art.12: financial, administrative, and functional control makes a body 'State' regardless of formal autonomy.

administrative-lawart-12stategovernment-control-testinstrumentality
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

Bhagwan Dass Jain v Union of India

AIR 1981 Supreme Court 1364

The power to tax is subject to constitutional limitations; a tax must be authorized by law and cannot be levied arbitrarily.

taxation-lawconstitutional-basisarticle-265no-tax-without-authority
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

CIT v. BC Srinivasa Setty

(1981) 128 Income Tax Reports 294 (SC)

Where cost of acquisition of a capital asset is indeterminate, the computation machinery fails and capital gains cannot be charged.

taxationcapital-gainscost-of-acquisitionself-generated-goodwillcomputation-failure
Read case brief
1981

Diamond v Diehr

450 U.S. 175 (1981)

A process that incorporates a computer program may be patentable if it produces a useful, concrete, and tangible result; the program element alone does not bar patentability (US Supreme Court).

it-lawsoftware-patentprocess-patentuseful-resultus-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

Fertilizer Corporation Kamgar Union (Regd.), Sindri v Union of India

AIR 1981 Supreme Court 344

Art.32 is a remedy for enforcement of fundamental rights, not a general instrument for judicial review of every managerial/commercial decision; courts will not interfere with bona fide business decisions of public undertakings absent a demonstrable rights violation.

article-32locus-standimanagerial-decisionsjudicial-reviewpublic-sector
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

Francis Coralie Mullin v Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi

AIR 1981 Supreme Court 746

The right to life under Article 21 is not confined to mere animal existence; it includes the right to live with human dignity and all that goes along with it, and extends even to detenus under preventive detention laws.

article-21right-to-lifehuman-dignitydetenu-rightsexpansive-interpretation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

Guru Nanak Foundation v Rattan Singh & Sons

AIR 1981 Supreme Court 2075; (1981) 4 Supreme Court Cases 634

The Arbitration Act, 1940 had become a source of delay rather than remedy; highlighted need for reform leading to the 1996 Act

ADRarbitrationreform1940-Actlandmark
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1981

Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Garland

[1981] STC 464

The expressio unius est exclusio alterius maxim (expression of one thing implies exclusion of another) applies where a statute lists specific items and omits others. The omission is presumed deliberate. However, the maxim is merely an aid and cannot override clear legislative intent shown by context.

expressio-uniusexclusiondeliberate-omissionmaximstatutory-list
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

Madan Lal v Mst. Gopi

AIR 1981 Supreme Court 754

Service of summons must strictly comply with the modes prescribed under Order V CPC; where a defendant is shown to have had actual knowledge of the proceedings despite an irregularity in the mode of service, courts may, in appropriate cases, treat the defect as cured, but this is an exception applied cautiously and does not dilute the general requirement of proper service as a foundational requirement of natural justice in civil proceedings.

service-of-summonsorder-v-cpcactual-knowledgeirregularity-in-service
Read case brief
Gauhati High Court (Division Bench)1981

Mst Rukia Khatun v Abdul Khalique Laskar

(1981) 1 Gauhati Law Reports 375

The correct law of talaq as ordained by the Holy Quran is that talaq must be for a reasonable cause, and that it must be preceded by an attempt at reconciliation between the husband and wife by two arbiters, one chosen by the wife from her family and the other by the husband from his. If their attempts fail, talaq may be effected. Talaq should not be at the mere desire, sweet will, whim or caprice of the husband, and should not be secret. Jiauddin Ahmed correctly laid down the law, and the contrary Calcutta and Bombay decisions are not correct law.

muslim-lawtalaqreasonable-causereconciliationtwo-arbitersdivision-benchbaharul-islamgauhati
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

Mst Zohara Khatoon v Mohd Ibrahim

(1981) 2 Supreme Court Cases 509; All India Reporter 1981 Supreme Court 1243; judgment of 18 February 1981

The expression divorced wife in the Explanation (b) to S.125(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is wide enough to cover a wife whose marriage has been dissolved on her own initiative, including by a decree under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939. Such a woman remains a wife for the purposes of S.125 and is entitled to maintenance.

muslim-lawmaintenancesection-125-crpcdivorced-wifedissolution-of-muslim-marriages-actmodes-of-dissolution
Read case brief
Gauhati High Court1981

Sri Jiauddin Ahmed v Mrs Anwara Begum

(1981) 1 Gauhati Law Reports 358

Although a Muslim marriage is a civil contract, a high degree of sanctity attaches to it and dissolution is recognised only in exceptional circumstances. Talaq must be for reasonable cause and must be preceded by attempts at reconciliation between the husband and the wife by two arbiters, one from the wife's family and the other from the husband's. Only if those attempts fail may talaq be effected. The attempt at reconciliation by two relatives, one from each side, is an essential condition precedent to talaq.

muslim-lawtalaqreasonable-causereconciliationtwo-arbitersbaharul-islamgauhatiproof-of-talaq
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

United Commercial Bank v. Bank of India

AIR 1981 Supreme Court 1426

The relationship between banker and depositor is primarily that of debtor and creditor; the bank becomes owner of deposited money

banker-customerdebtor-creditordepositsbanking-relationship
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1981

Waman Rao v Union of India

(1981) 2 Supreme Court Cases 362; All India Reporter 1981 Supreme Court 271

The basic structure doctrine applies to constitutional amendments made after 24 April 1973, the date of Kesavananda Bharati. Amendments made before that date, and laws placed in the Ninth Schedule before it, are immune from challenge on basic structure grounds.

constitutional-lawbasic-structurearticle-31aarticle-31cninth-scheduleprospective-application24-april-1973land-reform
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1980

Bachan Singh v State of Punjab

AIR 1980 Supreme Court 898

Death penalty is constitutional but restricted to the 'rarest of rare' cases: life imprisonment is the rule, death is the exception

death-penaltyrarest-of-raresentencingpunishment-theoryconstitutionalfoundational
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1980

CIT v Smt. P.K. Kochammu Amma

(1980) 125 Income Tax Reports 624 (SC)

Income from letting out of property is taxable under the head 'Income from House Property' if the property is used for letting; the nature of the asset determines the head of income.

professional-ethicstaxation-lawincome-from-house-propertyaccounting
Read case brief
US Supreme Court1980

Diamond v. Chakrabarty

447 U.S. 303 (1980)

Man-made living micro-organisms are patentable subject matter; anything under the sun made by man qualifies

patentsbiotechnologymicro-organismspatentable-subject-matter
Read case brief
House of Lords1980

Duport Steels Ltd. v. Sirs

[1980] 1 Weekly Law Reports 142

The role of the judiciary is to interpret and apply the law as enacted by Parliament, not to legislate. Where Parliament has spoken clearly, the court must give effect to the words used even if the result appears unjust or unwise. Judicial activism cannot substitute for Parliamentary amendment.

judicial-restraintseparation-of-powersparliamentary-sovereigntyclear-wordsrole-of-judiciary
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1980

Fuzlunbi v K Khader Vali

(1980) 4 Supreme Court Cases 125; All India Reporter 1980 Supreme Court 1730; judgment of 8 May 1980

Payment of mehr does not automatically operate under S.127(3)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to cancel or discharge an order of maintenance under S.125. S.127(3)(b) is attracted only where the sum paid under customary or personal law is in substance a genuine sum adequate to serve the purpose of maintenance and to prevent destitution, so that it can be said to have been paid on divorce in lieu of maintenance. A conventional or illusory mehr does not qualify.

muslim-lawmaintenancemehrsection-125-crpcsection-127-crpckrishna-iyerdestitutionarticle-141
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1980

Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab

AIR 1980 Supreme Court 1632

Anticipatory bail under S.438 CrPC (now S.482 BNSS) can be granted without time limit. Courts should not impose condition of surrender; that would negate the purpose of anticipatory bail.

anticipatory-bailS.482-BNSSpersonal-libertyarticle-21sem-5
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1980

Harnandrai Budhrani v. Chandra Krishan

AIR 1980 Allahabad 121

Section 47 CPC requires all questions arising between the parties to the suit in which the decree was passed, or their representatives, relating to the execution, discharge, or satisfaction of the decree, to be determined by the executing court and not by a separate suit.

CPCexecutionsection-47questions-in-executionexecuting-court-jurisdictionno-separate-suit
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1980

Jolly George Verghese v. Bank of Cochin

AIR 1980 Supreme Court 470

Civil imprisonment for non-payment of a decree debt must be reconciled with Article 21 and Article 11 of the ICCPR. Mere inability to pay is not dishonest avoidance; arrest is permissible only where the judgment-debtor has the means to pay but wilfully refuses or has acted in bad faith.

CPCexecutioncivil-imprisonmentarrestarticle-21ICCPRsection-51order-XXI
Read case brief
Kerala High Court1980

Kalyani v Narayanan

AIR 1980 Kerala 253

Permissive use (by licence) can never ripen into prescriptive easement regardless of duration; use must be 'as of right'

property-laweasementprescriptionpermissive-usesection-15as-of-right
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1980

Minerva Mills Ltd. and Ors. v Union of India and Ors.

AIR 1980 Supreme Court 1789

Clauses 4 and 5 of Article 368, inserted by the 42nd Amendment (which sought to place constitutional amendments beyond judicial review and grant Parliament unlimited amending power), were struck down as violative of the basic structure doctrine; limited amending power itself is a basic feature of the Constitution.

basic-structurearticle-368judicial-review42nd-amendmentharmony-fr-dpsp
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1980

Rukmanibai Gupta v Collector, Jabalpur

AIR 1981 Supreme Court 479

An arbitration clause in one document can be incorporated into another contract by reference, provided the reference makes the clause part of the contract

ADRsection-7incorporation-by-referencearbitration-agreement
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1980

Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration

AIR 1980 Supreme Court 1579

Prisoners retain fundamental rights under Art. 21. Rights do not stop at prison gates. Torture, bar fetters, and inhuman conditions are prohibited.

prisoners-rightsarticle-21prison-reformtorturedignitysem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1980

V.C. Shukla v. State (Delhi Administration)

(1980) 2 Supreme Court Cases 665

A charge must be specific and definite so as to give the accused clear notice of the accusation. Vague or omnibus charges that do not specify the particulars of time, place, and manner of offence violate the right to a fair trial. However, technical defects in framing of charge that do not prejudice the accused are curable.

chargeframingspecificityS.233-BNSSfair-trialsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

Avon Services Production Agencies Pvt. Ltd. v Industrial Tribunal, Haryana

AIR 1979 Supreme Court 170

A settlement arrived at in the course of conciliation proceedings, if it is fair, genuine, and satisfies the requirements of Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, is binding on all workmen of the establishment, including those who did not individually participate in or agree to the settlement, provided it was reached through a properly constituted process.

conciliation-settlementsection-12-3binding-effectfair-and-genuine
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

Bai Tahira v Ali Hussain Fissalli Chothia

All India Reporter 1979 Supreme Court 362; (1979) 2 Supreme Court Cases 316; judgment of 6 October 1978

A settlement or agreement between husband and wife at the time of divorce, even if it purports to be in full and final settlement of all claims, does not bar the wife from claiming maintenance under S.125 CrPC if the amount received is not sufficient to maintain her and she is unable to maintain herself. S.127(3)(b) operates to cancel a maintenance order only where the sum paid under customary or personal law is in substance adequate to serve the purpose of maintenance and prevent destitution.

maintenancesection-125-crpcsection-127-crpcfair-settlementdivorced-womanmehrmuslim-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

Excel Wear v. Union of India

(1979) 1 Supreme Court Cases 292

Prior permission requirement for closure is constitutionally valid as reasonable restriction under Art.19(6); but State cannot force indefinite operation of genuinely unviable business

closureprior-permissionArt-19-1-greasonable-restrictionconstitutional-validity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

Gestetner Duplicators v CIT

(1979) 117 ITR 1 (Supreme Court)

For depreciation, the asset must be 'used' for the purpose of business; passive ownership without actual use does not qualify.

taxation-lawdepreciationused-for-businessactual-use
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, Bihar

AIR 1979 Supreme Court 1369

Free legal aid to an indigent accused is a fundamental right under Art. 21. The right to legal aid is part of reasonable, fair and just procedure.

professional-ethicslegal-aidarticle-21fundamental-rightundertrial-prisoners
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

M Karunanidhi v Union of India

(1979) 3 Supreme Court Cases 431; All India Reporter 1979 Supreme Court 898

Repugnancy under Article 254 requires a direct and irreconcilable conflict between a Union and a State law, such that obedience to one involves disobedience to the other, or an intention on Parliament's part to lay down an exhaustive code occupying the whole field. Where the two operate in different fields or the State law merely supplements the central law, both may stand.

constitutional-lawrepugnancyarticle-254concurrent-listoccupied-fieldlegislative-relationsprevention-of-corruption
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

Maneka Sanjay Gandhi v. Rani Jethmalani

(1979) 4 Supreme Court Cases 167

Transfer of criminal case can be ordered under S.407 CrPC (now S.430 BNSS) where a reasonable apprehension exists that a fair trial is not possible due to hostile atmosphere, political influence, or media prejudice. The convenience of the accused and ends of justice are paramount considerations.

transferfair-trialS.430-BNSSpolitical-influencesem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co Ltd v State of Uttar Pradesh

AIR 1979 Supreme Court 621

Promissory estoppel against government: four elements (clear representation, intended reliance, actual reliance, detriment); overrideable only by demonstrated supervening public interest disclosed to court.

administrative-lawpromissory-estoppellegitimate-expectationsem-3
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

Ramana Dayaram Shetty v International Airport Authority of India

(1979) 3 Supreme Court Cases 489; All India Reporter 1979 Supreme Court 1628

The State and its instrumentalities must act fairly and without arbitrariness or discrimination in awarding contracts and conferring benefits. Having laid down a standard or norm for eligibility, the State is bound to adhere to it and cannot depart from it in an individual case.

constitutional-lawarticle-14government-contractstenderarbitrarinessinstrumentality-of-stateeligibility-criteriapublic-largesse
Read case brief
Patna High Court1979

Rambaran Prasad v. Ghura Dei

AIR 1979 Pat 142

Under S.119, if a party is evicted from property received in exchange due to defective title, the exchange is voidable and the party can recover their original property

property-lawTPAsection-119exchangeeviction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs v. Anil Kumar Bhunja

AIR 1980 Supreme Court 52

In a warrant case tried by a Magistrate, once charge is framed and the accused pleads not guilty, the Magistrate must follow the prescribed procedure strictly: prosecution evidence first, then defence. The Magistrate cannot short-circuit the process or deny the accused the right to recall witnesses.

warrant-casemagistrate-trialS.259-BNSSproceduresem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1979

V.C. Rangadurai v D. Gopalan

AIR 1979 Supreme Court 281

An advocate must not suppress material facts from the court; the duty to the court overrides the duty to the client where they conflict.

professional-ethicsduty-to-courtsuppression-of-factsprofessional-misconduct
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa

(1978) 2 Supreme Court Cases 213

Triple Test for determining 'industry': (1) systematic activity, (2) cooperation between employer and employee, (3) for production/supply/distribution of goods or services satisfying human wants

landmarkseven-judge-benchindustry-definitiontriple-testsystematic-activity
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division (England)1978

Bernstein v. Skyviews and General Ltd.

[1978] Queen's Bench 479

Landowner airspace rights extend only to the height reasonably necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land, not to an unlimited vertical extent.

trespass-to-landairspaceaviation
Read case brief
Diplomatic Settlement (Liability Convention 1972)1978

Cosmos 954 Incident (Canada v Union of Soviet Socialist Republics)

1981 XXIII UNRIAA 270 (diplomatic settlement)

Absolute liability under Article II of the Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (1972) applies without proof of fault for damage caused by a space object on the earth's surface.

PILspace-lawabsolute-liabilityliability-conventionnuclear
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

Crompton Greaves Ltd. v. Workmen

(1978) 3 Supreme Court Cases 558

Go-slow is NOT a strike (no cessation of work) but IS serious misconduct: more insidious than strike because workers receive full wages while deliberately reducing output

go-slownot-strikemisconductdisciplinary-actionoutput-reduction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor

AIR 1978 Supreme Court 429

Bail is the rule, jail the exception. Refusal of bail is restriction on personal liberty. Relevant factors: flight risk, interference with justice, character of accused, nature of accusation.

bailrule-exceptionpersonal-libertyarticle-21sem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

Gurupad Khandappa Magdum v Hirabai Khandappa Magdum

AIR 1978 Supreme Court 1239

For the purpose of computing the share of a widow or other heir under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a notional partition must be deemed to have taken place immediately before the death of the coparcener, and the deceased's share is fixed as if such partition had actually occurred, giving the widow her full notional share plus her inherited share from the deceased.

notional-partitionsection-6-hsawidows-sharecoparcenary-computation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India

AIR 1978 Supreme Court 597

Art.21 requires that procedure established by law be fair, just, and reasonable; not arbitrary, fanciful, or oppressive. Art.14, 19, and 21 are interconnected (the 'golden triangle').

constitutional-lawarticle-21fair-procedurepersonal-libertygolden-triangle
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

Mohinder Singh Gill v Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi

(1978) 1 Supreme Court Cases 405; All India Reporter 1978 Supreme Court 851

Article 324 is a reservoir of power enabling the Election Commission to act where the enacted law is silent, so as to ensure a free and fair election. The power must be exercised consistently with existing law and in conformity with natural justice, and is subject to judicial review. A public order must stand on the reasons it discloses and cannot be supported by fresh reasons supplied later.

constitutional-lawarticle-324election-commissionreservoir-of-powerfree-and-fair-electionsnatural-justicereasonsrepoll
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

Moti Ram v. State of MP

AIR 1978 Supreme Court 1594

Bail amount must be reasonable. Personal bond without surety suffices for indigent accused. Bail must not become a privilege of the wealthy.

bailpersonal-bondpovertyarticle-14article-21sem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani

AIR 1978 Supreme Court 1025

Art.20(3) protection against self-incrimination operates during police interrogation. A person is not bound to answer questions tending to expose them to criminal charge.

self-incriminationarticle-20-3police-interrogationinvestigationright-to-silence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

R.G. Anand v. M/s Delux Films

AIR 1978 Supreme Court 1613

No copyright in ideas, themes, or subject matter; seven-point test for infringement; only particular form of expression is protected

copyrightidea-expressioninfringementseven-point-test
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1978

Radhey Shyam v. Gur Prasad Serma

AIR 1978 Allahabad 86

Established common law nuisance principles, including the reasonableness assessment, apply to determine liability for noise interference in the Indian context.

private-nuisancenoisereasonablenessindian-application
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

State Bank of India v Shyama Devi

AIR 1978 Supreme Court 1263

Employer is vicariously liable for wrongs committed by employee in the course of employment, even if the specific act was unauthorised.

vicarious-liabilityemployer-employeecourse-of-employmentrespondeat-superior
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1978

Sunil Batra v Delhi Administration

AIR 1978 Supreme Court 1675

Prisoners retain fundamental rights under Art.21; prison administration must pursue reformation: punishment does not strip away all rights

prisoners-rightsreformationArt-21prison-reformpunishment-theory
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1977

Bisheshwar Dayal v Ram Bahadur Sinha

AIR 1977 Allahabad 78

An admission made by a party in pleadings, unless withdrawn or amended with the leave of the court, is binding on the party making it, and the court can act upon such an admission in deciding the rights of the parties, even though the admission is not conclusive proof and can, in appropriate circumstances, be explained or shown to have been made under a mistake.

admissions-in-pleadingsbinding-natureexplanation-of-admission
Read case brief
High Court1977

Kaushalya Devi v. Prem Chand

AIR 1977 (NOC) 42

Where an advocate fails to appear without informing the client, and the client had no knowledge of the non-appearance, the advocate's default may constitute 'sufficient cause' for the client's absence, entitling the client to setting aside of ex parte decree.

CPCex-parte-decreeorder-IX-rule-13sufficient-causeadvocate-defaultnon-appearance
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1977

Narandas Karsondas v SA Kamtam

AIR 1977 Supreme Court 774

Right of redemption subsists until extinguished by foreclosure decree, court sale, or limitation; mere passage of time does not destroy it

property-lawmortgageredemptionsection-60foreclosurelimitation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1977

State of Karnataka v Union of India

AIR 1977 Supreme Court 1361

The Commissions of Inquiry Act is constitutionally valid; a Commission appointed by the Union may inquire into state government conduct where the subject relates to a Union legislative entry; natural justice must be followed.

administrative-lawcommissions-of-inquiryfederalismsem-3
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1977

State of Rajasthan v Union of India

(1977) 3 Supreme Court Cases 592; All India Reporter 1977 Supreme Court 1361

The satisfaction of the President under Article 356 is subjective and largely political, and was held reviewable only in the narrowest circumstances, such as where the action rested on wholly extraneous considerations or was mala fide. The decision has since been substantially superseded by S R Bommai.

constitutional-lawarticle-356presidents-rulearticle-131subjective-satisfactionjusticiabilitydissolution
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1977

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Nawab Hussain

AIR 1977 Supreme Court 1680

Constructive res judicata bars a subsequent suit on a ground that might and ought to have been raised in an earlier writ petition. A litigant cannot reserve grounds for successive rounds of litigation.

CPCconstructive-res-judicatasection-11explanation-IVwrit-petitionarticle-311might-and-ought
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1977

T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal

(1977) 4 Supreme Court Cases 467

A plaint that is manifestly vexatious and does not disclose a real cause of action must be rejected at the threshold. Courts should not allow process to be abused as a weapon of harassment through frivolous litigation.

CPCrejection-of-plaintorder-VII-rule-11vexatious-plaintabuse-of-processcause-of-action
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1977

Tulasamma v Sesha Reddi

AIR 1977 Supreme Court 1944

Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act converts the limited estate of a Hindu female into an absolute estate, regardless of how the property was acquired; the wide language of S.14(1) must receive liberal interpretation to advance its social purpose of removing gender disability.

successionlimited-estateabsolute-estatesection-14womens-property-rights
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1977

Union of India v Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth

(1977) 4 Supreme Court Cases 193; All India Reporter 1977 Supreme Court 2328

The consent of a Judge is not required for a transfer under Article 222, but the power may be exercised only in the public interest and never by way of punishment. The consultation with the Chief Justice of India must be full and effective, meaning that he must have all relevant material and a real opportunity to form an informed view.

constitutional-lawarticle-222transfer-of-judgesjudicial-independenceeffective-consultationpublic-interesthigh-court
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1976

ADM Jabalpur v Shivkant Shukla

AIR 1976 Supreme Court 1207

Per Khanna J (dissenting, now accepted as correct): the rule of law exists prior to and independent of the Constitution; it cannot be suspended even during Emergency.

administrative-lawrule-of-lawemergencyhabeas-corpussem-3
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1976

Anton Piller KG v. Manufacturing Processes Ltd

[1976] Chancery 55

Court may grant an ex parte order permitting the plaintiff to enter the defendant's premises to inspect and remove documents/articles that constitute evidence of infringement, where there is a real risk of destruction of evidence. This is the "Anton Piller Order" (now called a "search order").

anton-piller-ordersearch-orderex-partepreservation-of-evidenceIP-remedies
Read case brief
Delhi High Court1976

Gopal Singh Hira Singh v Punjab National Bank

AIR 1976 Delhi 115

A bailee in possession must account for the goods. Where goods are lost or damaged in the bailee's custody, the onus lies on the bailee to prove that he exercised the care required by Section 151.

bailmentsection-151section-152burden-of-proofpledgeduty-of-care
Read case brief
Bombay High Court (Nagpur)1976

Hayatuddin v Abdul Gani

All India Reporter 1976 Bombay 23; judgment of 2 December 1974

A gift of an undivided share (musha) in property capable of division is irregular (fasid) and not void (batil), and is perfected and validated by a subsequent partition and delivery to the donee of the share given, or if possession is once taken. Delivery may be effected according to the nature of the property: for tenanted property by the donor requesting the tenants to attorn to the donee, and where donor and donee both reside on the property by some overt act showing a clear intention to transfer possession.

muslim-lawgifthibamushaundivided-shareirregular-giftdelivery-of-possessionattornment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1976

Rohtas Industries Ltd. v Rohtas Industries Staff Union

AIR 1976 Supreme Court 425

An award made by an arbitrator under Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act stands on the same footing as an award made by a tribunal referred by the government, and questions of jurisdictional error in such private arbitration awards can be examined by courts on grounds similar to judicial review of tribunal awards, including whether the arbitrator exceeded the reference.

voluntary-arbitrationsection-10aarbitration-awardjudicial-review
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1976

Sat Paul v. Delhi Administration

(1976) 1 SCC 727

The testimony of a hostile witness is not entirely worthless; the court may rely upon so much of the testimony as is corroborated by other reliable evidence.

evidence-lawhostile-witnesssection-154cross-examination-by-own-party
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1976

State of Kerala v. NM Thomas

(1976) 2 Supreme Court Cases 310

Reasonable classification bearing nexus to legislative object does not violate Article 14; differential treatment of banking companies is constitutionally valid

Art-14reasonable-classificationbanking-regulationdifferential-treatment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1976

Syed Mohd Salie Labbai v Mohd Hanifa

(1976) 4 Supreme Court Cases 780; All India Reporter 1976 Supreme Court 1569; (1976) 3 Supreme Court Reports 721; judgment of 22 March 1976

Four conditions must be satisfied for a valid dedication of a public nature: the founder must declare his intention to dedicate the property, no particular form being necessary and the declaration being capable of being presumed from express or implied conduct; the founder must divest himself completely of ownership, which may be inferred from delivery of possession; the property must be separated from the rest of his property with a way of access provided; and there must be delivery, which for a mosque means that people should pray there in jamaat, and where there is no express dedication prayers must have been offered with azan and ikamat. Where prayers have once been offered it is unnecessary to prove an express dedication, and dedication may also be inferred from long user as waqf property. Once a kabarstan is a public graveyard, non user does not change its character.

muslim-lawwaqfwaqf-by-usermosquegraveyardkabarstanazanikamat
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1975

American Cyanamid Co. v. Ethicon Ltd.

[1975] Appeal Cases 396

At interlocutory stage, the court should not resolve contested questions of fact or law; it need only satisfy itself there is a serious question to be tried, then consider balance of convenience. Widely adopted in Indian courts alongside the Dalpat Kumar test.

CPCtemporary-injunctioninterlocutoryserious-questionbalance-of-convenienceUK-authority
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1975

Ashok Dulichand v. Madhavlal Dube

(1975) 4 SCC 664

Secondary evidence is inadmissible without laying proper foundation by proving the original exists and falls within a prescribed condition for its reception.

evidence-lawsecondary-evidencefoundationsection-65documentary-evidence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1975

Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar

AIR 1976 Supreme Court 242

Professional misconduct is not limited to violations of the BCI Code. The Code is illustrative, not exhaustive. Any conduct unworthy of an advocate constitutes misconduct.

professional-ethicsmisconductdabholkarBCI-codedisciplinary
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1975

CIT v Harprasad and Co

(1975) 99 ITR 118 (Supreme Court)

A receipt that is capital in nature does not become income merely because it is received in the course of business; the character of the receipt must be determined.

taxation-lawcapital-vs-revenuenature-of-receipt
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1975

Horrocks v. Lowe

[1975] Appeal Cases 135

Malice defeating qualified privilege requires knowledge of falsity, reckless indifference to truth, or a predominant improper motive unconnected to the duty or interest the privilege protects.

defamationqualified-privilegemalice
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1975

Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain

AIR 1975 Supreme Court 2299

Rule of Law and judicial review are part of the basic structure; Parliament cannot exercise judicial function through constitutional amendment

administrative-lawbasic-structurerule-of-lawseparation-of-powers39th-amendment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1975

Narayan Ganesh Dastane v. Sucheta Narayan Dastane

(1975) 1 SCC 326

In civil cases, the standard of proof is balance of probabilities (preponderance of evidence), not proof beyond reasonable doubt, even for serious allegations like cruelty.

evidence-lawstandard-of-proofcivil-standardbalance-of-probabilitiespreponderance-of-evidencecruelty
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1975

Premier Automobiles Ltd. v Kamlekar Shantaram Wadke and Ors.

AIR 1975 Supreme Court 2238

Where a right or obligation is created exclusively by the Industrial Disputes Act, and that Act provides a specific remedy through its own adjudicatory machinery, a civil suit to enforce that right is barred, and the aggrieved party must proceed through the industrial dispute resolution machinery; but where the right sought to be enforced exists independently of the Act, a civil suit remains maintainable.

bar-of-suitindustrial-disputes-actcivil-court-jurisdictionexclusive-remedy
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1975

State of UP v. Raj Narain

AIR 1975 Supreme Court 865

Right to know is implicit in Art.19(1)(a); open government is foundational to democracy; government cannot claim blanket secrecy over its functioning

administrative-lawright-to-informationopen-governmentexecutive-privilegeart-19
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1975

Thirty Hoshiarpur v. State of Punjab

AIR 1975 SC 1734

When a document over 30 years old is produced from proper custody (government records office) and is regular on its face, court may presume its genuineness under S.90 IEA (now S.90 BSA).

evidence-lawpresumptionancient-documentssection-90proper-custodygenuineness
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1974

E.P. Royappa v State of Tamil Nadu

AIR 1974 Supreme Court 555

Article 14 is not confined to the classical 'reasonable classification' test; equality is antithetic to arbitrariness, and any state action that is arbitrary must necessarily involve a negation of equality.

article-14arbitrarinessnew-doctrine-of-equalityreasonable-classification
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1974

Ganga Bai v. Vijay Kumar

(1974) 2 Supreme Court Cases 393

Section 9 CPC confers an inherent right on every person to institute a civil suit. The jurisdiction of civil courts to try all suits of a civil nature is presumed unless expressly or impliedly barred. Exclusion of jurisdiction is not lightly inferred.

CPCsection-9jurisdictioncivil-courtinherent-rightexclusion-of-jurisdictionpresumption
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1974

Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection

AIR 1974 Supreme Court 348

Art. 20(3) protects against testimonial compulsion, not against search and seizure of physical evidence. Seizure of documents from accused does not violate self-incrimination privilege.

self-incriminationarticle-20-3search-seizureevidencesem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1974

Qudrat Ullah v. Municipal Board, Bareilly

AIR 1974 Supreme Court 396

A lease exceeding one year without a registered instrument does not create a valid leasehold interest; it may be treated as month-to-month tenancy

property-lawTPAsection-107leaseregistrationone-year
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1974

Samsher Singh v State of Punjab

(1974) 2 Supreme Court Cases 831; All India Reporter 1974 Supreme Court 2192

The President and the Governor are constitutional or formal heads of the executive. They exercise their powers and functions on the aid and advice of their Council of Ministers, save in a few well known exceptional situations, and the satisfaction required by the Constitution is that of the Council of Ministers and not their personal satisfaction.

constitutional-lawarticle-74article-163article-77article-166constitutional-headaid-and-advicesatisfaction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1974

Shyam Sunder v. State of Rajasthan

AIR 1974 Supreme Court 890

Whether premises are a factory under the Factories Act turns on manufacturing process and worker numbers, not registration. A temporary seasonal operation can be a factory.

factories-actfactory-definitionmanufacturing-processseasonal-operation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1973

Akalu Ahir v. Ramdeo Ram

AIR 1973 Supreme Court 2145

In a criminal appeal, the appellate court can reappraise evidence independently but should not disturb findings of fact unless they are perverse, based on no evidence, or result in miscarriage of justice.

appealrevisionevidence-reappreciationS.415-BNSSappellate-powerssem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1973

Bar Council of UP v. State of UP

AIR 1973 Supreme Court 231

The Advocates Act is a complete code on legal practice. The State cannot legislate additionally on matters covered by it. The field is occupied.

professional-ethicsadvocates-actlegislative-competencecomplete-codestate-legislation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1973

CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd

(1973) 88 Income Tax Reports 192 (SC)

In cases of ambiguity in a taxing statute, the interpretation favourable to the assessee must be adopted.

taxationinterpretationambiguityassessee-favourable-constructionstrict-interpretation
Read case brief
House of Lords1973

Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd

[1973] Appeal Cases 360

In quasi-partnership companies, the court may order winding up on the 'just and equitable' ground where there has been a breach of the equitable considerations (legitimate expectations) superimposed upon the strict legal rights.

winding-upjust-and-equitablequasi-partnershiplegitimate-expectationsequitable-considerations
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1973

Jayaram Mudaliar v. Ayyaswami

AIR 1973 Supreme Court 569

Lis pendens (S.52) applies irrespective of notice; based on public policy and necessity of litigation, not constructive notice

property-lawTPAsection-52lis-pendenspublic-policylandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (13-judge bench)1973

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

AIR 1973 Supreme Court 1461

Parliament's amending power under Article 368 cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution.

basic-structure-doctrineconstitutional-amendmentsarticle-368ninth-schedulefundamental-rights
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1973

R v. Barton

[1973] 1 WLR 115

In exceptional criminal cases where the liberty of a person is at stake, the court may require disclosure of lawyer-client privileged communications if they are essential to establishing innocence; the right to fair trial may override professional privilege.

evidence-lawprivilegelegal-professional-privilegefair-trialenglish-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1973

Umakant Saran v State of Bihar

AIR 1973 Supreme Court 964

Mandamus lies to compel a public authority to exercise a statutory discretion it has refused to exercise; it cannot direct the outcome of that discretion.

administrative-lawmandamusdiscretionsem-3
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1973

Workmen of Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of India Pvt. Ltd. v Management

AIR 1973 Supreme Court 1227

The definition of 'lay-off' under Section 2(kkk) of the Industrial Disputes Act requires the failure, refusal, or inability of an employer to give employment arising from specified causes (shortage of coal, power, raw materials, accumulation of stock, breakdown of machinery, or natural calamity); an employer cannot invoke lay-off for reasons falling outside this exhaustive statutory list, and such action, if unjustified, is treated as illegal, entitling workmen to full wages.

lay-offsection-2-kkkexhaustive-groundswages-during-layoff
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1972

British Railways Board v Herrington

[1972] Appeal Cases 877

An occupier owes a duty of 'common humanity' even to trespassers; the old rule of no duty to trespassers (Addie v Dumbreck) was departed from.

tort-lawoccupiers-liabilitytrespassersduty-of-carecommon-humanity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1972

Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v Ludh Budh Singh

AIR 1972 Supreme Court 1031

A domestic disciplinary inquiry, held by the employer before an order of dismissal, must be conducted fairly; where the domestic inquiry is found to be defective or invalid (for want of natural justice), the tribunal adjudicating the resulting industrial dispute can permit the employer to adduce fresh evidence to justify the dismissal before the tribunal itself, giving the employer a further opportunity to establish misconduct despite the flawed inquiry.

domestic-inquirydefective-inquiryfresh-evidence-before-tribunalnatural-justice
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1972

Harihar Prasad v. State of Bihar

AIR 1972 Supreme Court 1555

The principle of contemporanea expositio (interpretation by usage or practice contemporaneous with the enactment) is a valid aid to statutory interpretation.

contemporanea-expositioadministrative-practiceexternal-aidslong-standing-usage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1972

Hindustan Steel Ltd v. State of Orissa

(1972) 83 Income Tax Reports 26 (SC)

Penalty should not be imposed merely because it is lawful to do so; where breach is technical or bona fide, penalty may be declined.

taxationpenaltydiscretionbona-fidetechnical-breachdeterrent
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1972

Hukam Chand v. Union of India

AIR 1972 Supreme Court 2427

Delegated legislation (rules made under a statute) cannot go beyond the scope of the enabling Act. A power to make procedural rules does not include the power to alter substantive rights created by the parent Act. Subordinate legislation ultra vires the parent statute is void.

delegated-legislationultra-viresprocedural-rulessubstantive-rightsenabling-act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1972

Isher Das v. State of Punjab

AIR 1972 Supreme Court 1295

S.6 POA mandates that no person under 21 shall be imprisoned without first considering probation. Court must call for probation officer's report and record reasons before sentencing under-21 offender.

probationunder-21S.6-POAmandatorysentencingsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1972

Jayaram Mudaliar v Ayyaswami

AIR 1972 Supreme Court 1199

S.52 (lis pendens) applies only to the specific property that is the subject-matter of litigation; other properties of the litigant are not affected

property-lawlis-pendenssection-52scopesubject-matter
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1972

Ram Prashad v CIT

(1972) 86 ITR 122 (Supreme Court)

Remuneration received by a director from a company in which substantial shares are held is taxable under 'Salary' if there is an employer-employee relationship.

taxation-lawdirectorsalaryemployer-employee
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1972

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. v Workmen

AIR 1972 Supreme Court 1917

Standing orders certified under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 have statutory force and are binding on both employer and workmen as implied terms of the contract of employment; an employer cannot unilaterally alter certified standing orders without following the prescribed modification procedure.

standing-orderscertificationbinding-effectindustrial-employment-act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1972

Union of India v H S Dhillon

(1971) 2 Supreme Court Cases 779; All India Reporter 1972 Supreme Court 1061

Legislative competence of Parliament is tested by first asking whether the subject falls within the State List. If it does not, Parliament is competent by virtue of Article 248 read with Entry 97 of the Union List, whether or not any specific Union entry covers it. Taxes on the capital value of assets are distinct from taxes on lands and buildings.

constitutional-lawresiduary-powerarticle-248entry-97wealth-taxlegislative-competenceagricultural-landfinancial-relations
Read case brief
Kerala High Court1971

A Yousuf Rawther v Sowramma

All India Reporter 1971 Kerala 261; judgment of 24 June 1970

S.2(ii) of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939 is satisfied by the objective fact that the husband has failed to provide maintenance for two years, and the wife's own conduct in contributing to that failure does not defeat her claim to a decree. The 1939 Act is beneficial legislation for a weaker section and is to be construed accordingly.

muslim-lawdissolution-of-muslim-marriages-actfailure-to-maintainkhulakrishna-iyerbeneficial-construction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1971

Bajaj Auto Ltd v NK Firodia

AIR 1971 Supreme Court 321

The Board of Directors' refusal to register a transfer of shares must be exercised bona fide, in the interest of the company, and within a reasonable time; arbitrary or mala fide refusal is invalid.

transfer-of-sharesboard-powersbona-fideregistration-refusal
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1971

Bank of Bihar v. State of Bihar

AIR 1971 Supreme Court 1210

Banker's general lien under S.171 does not apply where securities are deposited for a specific purpose (implied contract to the contrary)

bankers-lienS171specific-purposeimplied-contractsafe-custody
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1971

K D Kamath and Co v Commissioner of Income Tax

(1971) 2 Supreme Court Cases 873

The two essential conditions of partnership are an agreement to share the profits of a business and the business being carried on by all or any of the partners acting for all. Concentration of management and control in one partner does not destroy the partnership.

partnershipsection-4mutual-agencytrue-testprofit-sharingcontrol-and-management
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1971

Management of Panitole Tea Estate v. Workmen

(1971) 1 Supreme Court Cases 742

Domestic inquiry before dismissal is mandatory regardless of how clear the misconduct appears; right to be heard is not dispensable

domestic-inquirymandatorynatural-justiceobvious-misconductdismissal
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1971

Perumal Nadar v Ponnuswami Nadar

AIR 1971 Supreme Court 2352

A person who has converted out of Hinduism can reconvert to Hinduism without any formal ceremony; a bona fide intention to revert to the Hindu fold and acceptance by the community are sufficient for reconversion.

reconversionwho-is-hinduapplication-of-hindu-lawconversion
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1971

Sait Tarajee Khimchand and Ors. v Yelamarti Satyam and Ors.

AIR 1971 Supreme Court 1865

Mere production and marking of a document as an exhibit during trial does not by itself amount to proof of the truth of its contents; unless the document is proved in accordance with the law of evidence, such as through examination of the person who authored it or otherwise establishing its authenticity and truth, it cannot be relied upon as substantive evidence of the facts it contains.

proof-of-documentsmarking-of-exhibitsdistinction-between-production-and-proof
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1971

Thornton v. Shoe Lane Parking Ltd

[1971] 2 Queen's Bench 163

Where a contract is formed at an automatic machine, terms printed on a ticket issued by the machine come too late to be incorporated; the more unusual or onerous a clause, the greater the notice required to incorporate it.

exclusion-clauseincorporationautomatic-machinereasonable-noticeonerous-termsstandard-form
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1971

U N R Rao v Smt Indira Gandhi

(1971) 2 Supreme Court Cases 63; All India Reporter 1971 Supreme Court 1002

Article 74(1) is mandatory. There must at all times be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at its head to aid and advise the President, and the Council does not cease to hold office on the dissolution of the House of the People.

constitutional-lawarticle-74article-75council-of-ministersdissolutionprime-ministerresponsible-government
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India

AIR 1970 Supreme Court 150

Natural justice applies to administrative (not only quasi-judicial) functions; duty to act fairly applies wherever rights are affected; rule against bias in selection processes

administrative-lawnatural-justicebiasselection-processadministrative-functionskraipak
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

Agra Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v Sri Alladin and Ors.

AIR 1970 Supreme Court 512

Standing orders certified under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act become part of the statutory conditions of service and are binding once certified; an employer's proposed changes to standing orders require the certifying officer's approval following the prescribed procedure, and cannot be enforced unilaterally by the employer as a fait accompli.

standing-orderscertification-procedurecertifying-officermodification
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

Arun Ghosh v. State of West Bengal

AIR 1970 Supreme Court 1228

Distinction between 'public order' and 'law and order': public order is the widest ripple in a pond (community-wide impact); mere law and order is the ripple closest to the pebble (individual impact).

public-orderlaw-and-orderdistinctionpreventive-powerssem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

CIT v Kulu Valley Transport Co

(1970) 77 ITR 518 (Supreme Court)

Subsidy received from the Government for running transport services is revenue in nature and taxable as business income.

taxation-lawsubsidyrevenue-receiptbusiness-income
Read case brief
House of Lords1970

DPP v. Ottewell

[1970] Appeal Cases 642

Penal statutes must be construed strictly in favour of the accused. Where the words of a penal provision are ambiguous, the construction less burdensome to the accused must be preferred. The court cannot extend penal liability by strained interpretation.

penal-statutestrict-constructionambiguityfavour-accusedliberty
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

K.A. Abbas v. Union of India

AIR 1971 Supreme Court 481

Pre-censorship of films is constitutionally valid as a reasonable restriction under Art.19(2). The classification system must be guided by standards that are not vague and must provide procedural safeguards against arbitrary exercise.

article-19reasonable-restrictionscensorshipconstitutional-lawsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

M.C. Chacko v. State Bank of Travancore

AIR 1970 Supreme Court 504

A person who is not a party to a contract cannot sue upon it, even where the contract purports to confer a benefit or impose an obligation affecting them, reaffirming the general privity rule.

privity-of-contractstranger-to-contractindian-application
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

Madhu Limaye v. Sub-Divisional Magistrate

AIR 1971 Supreme Court 2486

An order under S.144 CrPC (now S.163 BNSS) is subject to judicial review. The affected person can challenge it under S.133 CrPC or under Art.226/Art.32. The order must disclose material facts demonstrating urgency; a blanket order without application of mind is bad in law.

S.163-BNSSpreventive-ordersjudicial-reviewpublic-orderArt-19sem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

Management of Safdarjung Hospital v Kuldip Singh Sethi

AIR 1970 Supreme Court 1407

An establishment carrying on activities of a philanthropic, charitable, or purely medical/educational nature, without a profit-making or commercial motive, does not constitute an 'industry' under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, since the systematic activity must be analogous to trade or business to qualify.

definition-of-industrysection-2jcharitable-institutionhospital
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

Parry & Co. v. P.C. Pal

(1970) 2 Supreme Court Cases 879

Termination styled as 'discharge simpliciter' (without attributing misconduct) constitutes retrenchment requiring statutory compliance

discharge-simpliciterretrenchmentsubstance-over-formS25F
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1970

Prem Lata Agarwal v. Lakshman Prasad Gupta

AIR 1970 Allahabad 334

Enforcement of a decree is as important as passing it. The executing court must act expeditiously and cannot frustrate the decree by raising technical objections not available to the judgment-debtor.

CPCexecutiondecree-enforcementexpeditiousorder-XXIjudgment-debtor
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

R.C. Cooper v. Union of India

AIR 1970 Supreme Court 564

Deprivation of property requires fair compensation and the law must not be arbitrary; property rights cannot be illusory

propertycompensationbank-nationalisationfundamental-rights
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India

(1970) 1 Supreme Court Cases 248

Bank nationalisation is valid as public purpose but must provide adequate compensation; the 1969 Act struck down for inadequate compensation

nationalisationfundamental-rightsArt-14Art-19Art-31banking-regulationcompensation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

State of Uttar Pradesh v Om Prakash Gupta

AIR 1970 Supreme Court 679

In a disciplinary inquiry against an employee, the principles of natural justice require that the employee be given a fair opportunity to know the charges against him, to lead evidence in his defence, and to cross-examine witnesses relied upon by the employer; a disciplinary finding reached in violation of these safeguards is vitiated and cannot sustain a punishment of dismissal or removal.

disciplinary-proceedingsnatural-justicefair-opportunitycross-examination
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1970

Tapinder Singh v. State of Punjab

AIR 1970 Supreme Court 1566

FIR is not substantive evidence. It can only be used to corroborate (S.157) or contradict (S.145) the maker. Its value is as the earliest version of events.

FIRevidencecorroborationcontradictionnot-substantivesem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1969

Bank of Bihar Ltd v Damodar Prasad

AIR 1969 Supreme Court 297

The liability of a surety under Section 128 is immediate and co-extensive with that of the principal debtor. A creditor is not bound to exhaust his remedies against the principal debtor, or to realise any security, before proceeding against the surety.

guaranteesuretysection-128co-extensive-liabilityimmediacy
Read case brief
Gujarat High Court1969

Jamnadas Bhagvandas v. Bhagvandas Khushalchand

AIR 1969 Gujarat 243

Improper framing of issues is a serious irregularity. Where issues are not properly framed, evidence led may be irrelevant, and the decree is liable to be set aside on appeal.

CPCframing-of-issuesorder-XIVirregular-issuesappealsetting-aside-decree
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1969

London Artists Ltd. v. Littler

[1969] 2 Queen's Bench 375

The subject matter of fair comment must genuinely involve a matter the public has a legitimate interest in commenting upon.

defamationfair-commentpublic-interest
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1969

Nanak Chand v. Chandra Kishore Agrawala

AIR 1970 Supreme Court 446

In proceedings for maintenance under S.125 CrPC (now S.144 BNSS), the standard of proof is preponderance of probability, not proof beyond reasonable doubt. The wife need not prove neglect or refusal conclusively: a prima facie case suffices for the Magistrate to pass an order.

maintenanceS.144-BNSSstandard-of-proofwife-children-parentssem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1969

State of Gujarat v. Shantilal Mangaldas

AIR 1969 Supreme Court 634

Property is not an absolute right but a social function; it is subject to state regulation in the interest of the community

propertysocial-functionsociological-schoolstate-regulation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1968

Amrit Lal Goverdhan Lalan v State Bank of Travancore

AIR 1968 Supreme Court 1432

Under Section 141 a surety is entitled to the benefit of every security the creditor holds against the principal debtor, whether or not the surety knew of it. If the creditor loses or parts with such security without the surety's consent, the surety is discharged to the extent of the value of that security.

guaranteesuretysection-141dischargeloss-of-securitypro-tanto
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1968

Dhulabhai and Ors. v State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.

AIR 1969 Supreme Court 78

Laid down the seven principles governing when a civil court's jurisdiction is excluded by a special statute providing its own machinery for adjudication of disputes arising under it; exclusion of civil court jurisdiction is not to be readily inferred, and where a statute is found to be ultra vires, or a remedy provided under it is not adequate, or fundamental procedural requirements have not been complied with, civil court jurisdiction is not excluded despite an apparently exclusionary provision.

exclusion-of-civil-court-jurisdictionbar-of-suitseven-principlesspecial-statute
Read case brief
Calcutta High Court1968

Jay Engineering Works Ltd. v State of West Bengal

AIR 1968 Calcutta 407

A 'gherao' (physical surrounding and confinement of management personnel by workers) is not a legitimate form of protest or trade union activity protected by law; it amounts to wrongful confinement and unlawful restraint, and is not covered by the immunities granted to trade unions for peaceful and lawful industrial action.

gheraowrongful-confinementtrade-union-immunityunlawful-protest
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1968

Marfani & Co v. Midland Bank

[1968] 1 Weekly Law Reports 956

Collecting company cheque into employee's personal account without inquiry constitutes negligence; S.131 protection lost

collecting-bankernegligenceS131conversioncompany-chequepersonal-account
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1968

Mulamchand v State of Madhya Pradesh

All India Reporter 1968 Supreme Court 1218; (1968) 3 Supreme Court Reports 214

Where a contract is void for non-compliance with Article 299, no action lies on the contract and there can be no estoppel or ratification. But the party who has performed may recover the value of the benefit conferred under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, on a quasi-contractual basis.

constitutional-lawarticle-299government-contractsquasi-contractsection-70restitutionunjust-enrichment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1968

Robert D'Souza v Executive Engineer, Southern Railway (cited in labour law casebooks alongside Tata Iron and Steel disciplinary matters)

AIR 1968 Supreme Court 843

Where an employee is dismissed without a proper inquiry, and reinstatement is directed, the question of back wages for the intervening period is a matter of discretion for the tribunal, to be exercised having regard to the circumstances, including whether the workman was gainfully employed elsewhere during the period, and is not an automatic entitlement flowing mechanically from a finding of illegal termination.

reinstatementback-wagesdiscretion-of-tribunalillegal-termination
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1968

Union of India v Anglo Afghan Agencies

AIR 1968 Supreme Court 718

Promissory estoppel operates against the government; the government is bound by its representations when parties have acted in reliance on them to their detriment.

administrative-lawpromissory-estoppelsem-3
Read case brief
House of Lords1967

Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. Rayner and Keeler Ltd

[1967] 1 Appeal Cases 853

Courts may recognise the acts of an unrecognised government as valid if that government acts as a subordinate or agent of a recognised sovereign state. The "agency theory" allows circumventing non-recognition where practical necessity demands.

recognitionagency-theoryunrecognised-governmenteast-germanypractical-necessity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1967

I.C. Golak Nath and Others v State of Punjab

AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1643

Parliament has no power to abridge or take away any of the fundamental rights in Part III through the amending power under Article 368; a constitutional amendment is 'law' within Article 13(2). (Overruled by Kesavananda Bharati, 1973.)

article-368article-13fundamental-rightsconstitutional-amendmentoverruled
Read case brief
Supreme Court of Pakistan1967

Khurshid Bibi v Muhammad Amin

Pakistan Legal Decisions 1967 Supreme Court 97

Under Muslim law a wife is entitled to khula as of right if she satisfies the court that she would otherwise be forced into a hateful union, even if the husband does not consent and does not pronounce talaq. Where the husband disputes the right, the dispute is for the Qazi, that is the court, to adjudicate. The right is controlled rather than absolute, in that its success depends on the court being satisfied that the spouses cannot live within the limits of God, and it is conditional on the wife restoring or agreeing to restore the dower or other consideration received. Khula is separation and not talaq, so the husband has no right to take the wife back as he would after talaq-i-raja'i.

muslim-lawkhulawife-initiated-divorcepakistanpersuasive-authorityqazidower-restorationcomparative
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1967

Lallan Prasad v Rahmat Ali

AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1322

A pawnee's right to recover the debt is correlative to his ability to redeliver the pledged goods on payment. A pawnee who has parted with or cannot produce the goods cannot enforce the debt, because that would defeat the pawnor's right of redemption under Section 177.

pledgepawneesection-176section-177redemptioncorrelative-obligation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1967

Rajasthan State Electricity Board v Mohan Lal and Ors.

AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1857

The expression 'State' under Article 12 extends to include statutory corporations invested with powers to make binding rules with the force of law, functioning as an instrumentality of government.

article-12definition-of-statestatutory-corporationinstrumentality-of-state
Read case brief
House of Lords1967

Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver

[1967] 2 Appeal Cases 134

Directors must account for any profit made by virtue of their position; the no-profit rule is strict and applies irrespective of whether the company could have obtained the profit itself or suffered any loss.

directorsfiduciary-dutyno-profit-ruleaccountabilitycorporate-opportunity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1967

State of Orissa v. Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei

AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1269

Before making an adverse order (retirement on ground of age discrepancy), authority must give notice and opportunity to the affected person: audi alteram partem applies

administrative-lawnatural-justiceaudi-alteram-partemadverse-ordergovernment-servant
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

Barium Chemicals Ltd v Company Law Board

AIR 1966 Supreme Court 1648

The Central Government's power to order investigation of a company must be exercised on a reasonable basis; the satisfaction of the government must be objective and not based on mere suspicion.

investigationcentral-governmentobjective-satisfactionreasonable-basisjudicial-review
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

Bhagwati Prasad v. Chandramaul

AIR 1966 Supreme Court 735

Amendment of pleadings introducing a new cause of action is permitted if it does not constitute a fresh suit barred by limitation. Courts should lean towards amendments that serve justice, not defeat it.

CPCamendment-of-pleadingsorder-VI-rule-17new-cause-of-actionlimitationjustice-oriented
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

Chandra Mohan v State of Uttar Pradesh

All India Reporter 1966 Supreme Court 1987; (1967) 1 Supreme Court Reports 77

District judges may be appointed only from two sources: persons already in the judicial service, meaning a service consisting exclusively of persons intended to fill judicial posts, and advocates of at least seven years standing recommended by the High Court. Consultation with the High Court under Article 233 is mandatory.

constitutional-lawarticle-233article-236district-judgesubordinate-judiciaryarticle-50judicial-serviceseparation-of-powers
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

CIT v. Shahzada Nand and Sons

AIR 1966 Supreme Court 1342

In a taxing statute, the court cannot supply casus omissus (a case omitted). If the Legislature has failed to cover a particular case, the court cannot extend the charging provision by implication to cover it. The subject is free of tax unless clearly within the letter of the law.

taxing-statutecasus-omissusstrict-constructionno-implicationcharging-section
Read case brief
Mysore High Court1966

Desa Gowda v. Thimma Gowda

AIR 1966 Mysore 62

Non-enjoyment of a discontinuous easement for 20 years extinguishes it regardless of the dominant owner's subjective intent to retain

property-laweasementssection-44extinctionnon-use
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

Dwarka Nath v. Income Tax Officer

AIR 1966 Supreme Court 81

Alternative remedy bar is not absolute; HC retains discretion under Art.226 where fundamental right violated, NJ breached, or authority acted without jurisdiction

administrative-lawwritsalternative-remedyart-226exceptions
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

Jalan Trading Co. v. Mill Mazdoor Sabha

AIR 1967 Supreme Court 691

The Full Bench Formula (laid down in Associated Cement Companies) for fixing wages is not a rigid formula. It provides a floor and framework but must be adapted to the financial capacity of the industry and cost of living. Bonus and dearness allowance are distinct from wages.

full-bench-formulawage-fixationminimum-wagesfinancial-capacitybonus
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

Laxmidas Morarji v Behrose Darab Madan

AIR 1966 Supreme Court 1265

A set-off, whether legal (under Order VIII Rule 6 CPC) or equitable, is a defence available to a defendant to extinguish or reduce the plaintiff's claim, decided within the framework of the same suit, and unlike a counterclaim, does not confer upon the defendant an independent status as a plaintiff seeking separate affirmative relief beyond the ambit of the original claim.

set-offorder-8-rule-6legal-set-offequitable-set-offdefence
Read case brief
Madras High Court1966

Lily White v. R. Munuswami

AIR 1966 Madras 13

An exemption clause limiting liability must be brought to the customer's reasonable notice at or before the time of contracting to be binding; a clause on a receipt handed over after the contract is concluded does not bind the customer.

standard-form-contractreasonable-noticeexemption-clausetiming
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar

AIR 1966 Supreme Court 740

Security proceedings cannot be used to suppress legitimate political activity. The apprehended breach must be proximate to public order, not speculative.

securitypublic-orderpolitical-rightsarticle-19preventive-actionsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

Shastri Yagnapurushadji v Muldas Brudardas Vaishya

AIR 1966 Supreme Court 1119

Hinduism is not a religion in the narrow Western sense but a way of life; it is broad enough to include within it all forms of belief and worship, including those of Swaminarayan sect followers, who remain Hindus for the purpose of Hindu law.

who-is-hinduhinduism-definitionway-of-lifeswaminarayanapplication-of-hindu-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1966

Sitaram Motilal Kalal v Santanuprasad

AIR 1966 Supreme Court 1697

Master is vicariously liable even when servant commits an expressly prohibited act, if the prohibited act is merely an unauthorised MODE of doing authorised work

vicarious-liabilityprohibited-actunauthorised-modecourse-of-employment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v State of Maharashtra

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 1564

For a conviction under Section 494 IPC (bigamy), the second marriage must be proved to have been performed with the essential ceremonies required by the applicable personal law; a marriage lacking proper ceremonies is not a valid marriage in the eyes of law and cannot found a bigamy conviction.

bigamysection-494-ipcessential-ceremoniesvoid-marriage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Hind Construction and Engineering Co. Ltd. v Their Workmen

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 917

Workers who absent themselves from duty under the mistaken but bona fide belief that a declared holiday entitled them to be absent, and who did not intend to strike or act in defiance of the employer, cannot be treated as having gone on an illegal strike; dismissal for such absence, disproportionate to the actual conduct involved, is not sustainable, and reinstatement is the appropriate remedy.

bona-fide-absenceillegal-strikeproportionality-of-punishmentreinstatement
Read case brief
House of Lords1965

Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Frere

[1965] Appeal Cases 402

Where a word appears in different sections of the same statute, there is a presumption of uniform meaning (same word, same meaning throughout). However, this presumption yields where the context clearly requires a different meaning in different sections.

uniform-meaningsame-wordcontextinternal-aidspresumption
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

K L Johar and Co v Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Coimbatore

All India Reporter 1965 Supreme Court 1082; (1965) 2 Supreme Court Reports 112

A hire purchase agreement has a dual character. It is a bailment coupled with an option to purchase, and the sale takes effect only when the option is exercised. Tax on the sale can therefore be levied only at that point and on the value of the goods at that time.

sale-of-goodshire-purchasebailmentoption-to-purchasedual-characterpassing-of-property
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Kasturi Lal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 1039

State NOT liable for torts committed in exercise of sovereign functions (police custody of seized property); sovereign immunity survives for core governmental acts.

administrative-lawstate-liabilitysovereign-immunitypolicesovereign-functioncriticized
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Mayer Hans George

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 722

Strict construction of penal statutes. Where the literal meaning of a penal provision does not cover the act in question, the accused gets the benefit of the doubt. A transit passenger carrying gold through India was acquitted because the statute penalised "bringing into India" which requires a voluntary act of importation.

strict-constructionpenal-statutegold-controltransit-passengerbenefit-of-doubt
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Morvi Mercantile Bank Ltd v Union of India

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 1954

Delivery of a document of title to goods, such as a railway receipt, operates as constructive delivery of the goods themselves and creates a valid pledge, entitling the pledgee to recover the full value of the goods from a carrier who loses them.

pledgesection-172constructive-deliverydocuments-of-titlerailway-receipttrade-finance
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Navnit Lal Javeri v K.K. Sen

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 1375

The deemed dividend provision (S.2(22)(e)) applies only to shareholders; a non-shareholder receiving a loan from a company is not covered.

taxation-lawdeemed-dividendsection-2-22-eshareholder
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Parimisetti Seetharamamma v CIT

(1965) 57 ITR 532 (Supreme Court)

Residential status under S.6 is determined for each assessment year independently; previous years' status is irrelevant.

taxation-lawresidential-statussection-6assessment-year
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 444

Court must consider the Probation of Offenders Act before imposing imprisonment. Failure to consider is an error of law. The younger the offender and less serious the offence, the stronger the case for probation.

probationsentencingfirst-offenderPOA-1958mandatory-considerationsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Sajjan Singh v State of Rajasthan

All India Reporter 1965 Supreme Court 845; (1965) 1 Supreme Court Reports 933

Shankari Prasad was affirmed, so a constitutional amendment is not 'law' within Article 13 and fundamental rights are amenable to amendment. An effect on Article 226 which is merely incidental is not a 'change in' that Chapter, so no ratification is required under the proviso to Article 368(2).

constitutional-lawarticle-368article-13amendmentninth-scheduleratificationincidental-effectbasic-features
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Shanti Prasad Jain v Kalinga Tubes Ltd

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 1535

Oppression requires a continuous course of oppressive conduct; isolated acts are insufficient unless of sufficient gravity; test is whether conduct is 'burdensome, harsh, and wrongful'

oppressioncontinuous-conductminority-protectionS241threshold
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

State of Gujarat v. Shyamlal Mohanlal

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 1251

Indian law does not follow the exclusionary rule. Evidence obtained through illegal search is admissible if relevant. The mode of procurement does not affect admissibility.

search-seizureadmissibilityexclusionary-ruleillegal-searchevidencesem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1965

Workmen of Motipur Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. v Motipur Sugar Factory

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 1803

Seasonal workers engaged in an industry that operates only during a defined season each year (such as a sugar factory during the crushing season) can nonetheless be considered workmen with a continuing relationship of employment for the purposes of the Industrial Disputes Act, if the pattern of re-engagement season after season establishes the character of regular, continuing employment rather than a series of wholly independent, unconnected engagements.

seasonal-workerscontinuing-employmentsugar-factoryworkman-status
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division1964

Adler v. George

[1964] 2 Queen's Bench 7

Golden Rule applied to extend "in the vicinity of" to include within a prohibited place, avoiding the absurdity of punishing lesser interference while ignoring greater interference inside.

golden-rulein-the-vicinity-ofprohibited-placeofficial-secretsabsurd-result
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1964

All India Trade Union Congress v State of Uttar Pradesh

AIR 1964 Allahabad 148

A registered trade union's rights and immunities under the Trade Unions Act extend to protecting the union's legitimate collective action; state interference with lawful trade union activity, absent statutory sanction, is not permissible.

trade-unionregistered-unioncollective-rightsstate-interference
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Arjun Singh v. Mohindra Kumar

AIR 1964 Supreme Court 993

Rejection of an application under Order IX Rule 7 (to set aside dismissal for plaintiff's default) does not bar a subsequent application under Order IX Rule 13 (to set aside an ex parte decree). The two remedies operate at different stages and address different situations.

CPCex-parte-decreeorder-IXrule-7rule-13setting-asidesufficient-causebona-fide
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Bank of Bihar v. Mahabir Lal

AIR 1964 Supreme Court 187

S.85 protection extends to payment made to holder's agent presenting cheque with apparent authority

paying-bankerS85holders-agentpayment-in-due-courseprotection
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Bombay Union of Journalists v State of Bombay

AIR 1964 Supreme Court 1617

The appropriate government's power to make a reference of an industrial dispute for adjudication involves a subjective satisfaction as to the existence of an industrial dispute, but this satisfaction must be based on relevant material and not be exercised arbitrarily; the government can decline reference where no genuine industrial dispute is shown to exist.

reference-powerappropriate-governmentsubjective-satisfactionindustrial-dispute
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1964

Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd

[1964] 2 Queen's Bench 480

Ostensible authority requires four conditions: a representation that the agent had authority, made by a person with actual authority to manage the business, on which the contractor relied, and in a transaction the principal had capacity to enter into.

agencyostensible-authorityapparent-authoritysection-237estoppelmanaging-director
Read case brief
Madhya Pradesh High Court1964

Harinarayan v. Badridass

AIR 1964 Madhya Pradesh 250

Once an easement of light is established, the servient owner cannot construct anything that substantially diminishes the light

property-laweasementslightnegative-easementobstruction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Jagdish Chandra Gupta v Kajaria Traders (India) Ltd

All India Reporter 1964 Supreme Court 1882; (1964) 8 Supreme Court Reports 50

The words 'other proceedings' in Section 69(3) of the Indian Partnership Act 1932 are of the widest import and include an application to appoint an arbitrator. An unregistered firm cannot make such an application to enforce a right arising from a contract.

partnershipsection-69registrationunregistered-firmarbitrationother-proceedings
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Makhan Singh v State of Punjab

All India Reporter 1964 Supreme Court 381; (1964) 4 Supreme Court Reports 797

An order under Article 359 bars only reliance on the rights specified in it. A detenu remains free to raise grounds outside those rights, including that the detention is mala fide, that the authority was not empowered, that the detention falls outside the four corners of the statute, or that the statute is invalid for reasons unconnected with the suspended articles.

constitutional-lawarticle-359emergencypreventive-detentionhabeas-corpusdefence-of-india-actsuspension-of-rights
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Its Workers

AIR 1964 Supreme Court 1486

ESI Act benefits are statutory entitlements that cannot be reduced by private agreements. Once the ESI Act applies to an establishment, the employer's liability to provide benefits under Section 46 is absolute and cannot be contracted out of.

ESI-actstatutory-benefitscannot-contract-outsocial-securityemployer-liability
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1964

Ridge v. Baldwin

[1964] Appeal Cases 40

Natural justice applies to all administrative decisions affecting rights; not merely quasi-judicial functions; revived natural justice after decades of restrictive interpretation

administrative-lawnatural-justiceridge-v-baldwinhearingenglish-lawrevival
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1964

Rookes v. Barnard

[1964] Appeal Cases 1129

Exemplary damages should be confined to specific categories: conduct calculated to profit the defendant beyond mere compensation, statutorily authorised awards, or oppressive, arbitrary, or unconstitutional conduct by government servants.

exemplary-damagespunitive-damagesremedies
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Special Reference No. 1 of 1964 (Keshav Singh's case)

All India Reporter 1965 Supreme Court 745; (1965) 1 Supreme Court Reports 413

A House of the legislature may punish for contempt, but the existence and extent of a claimed privilege is justiciable. A House is not a court of record, so its general warrant does not enjoy the immunity of a warrant of the House of Commons. A person committed for contempt may invoke Article 226, and the House cannot punish a Judge for the discharge of his judicial functions.

constitutional-lawprivilegesarticle-194article-143article-226contempt-of-housekeshav-singhjudicial-power
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bhailal Bhai

AIR 1964 Supreme Court 1006

A suit by the government for recovery of possession of immovable property is also governed by Article 65 of the Limitation Act (12-year period). The government is not entitled to a longer or special limitation period for possession suits.

limitation-actarticle-65government-suitspossession12-year-periodno-special-treatment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

State of U.P. v. Bhagwant Kishore Joshi

AIR 1964 Supreme Court 221

Investigation by police is an executive function and generally the court cannot interfere with it. However, where investigation is mala fide or conducted in violation of statutory provisions, the Magistrate or the High Court can intervene to direct proper investigation.

investigationpolice-powersjudicial-interventionS.193-BNSSmala-fidesem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

State of Uttar Pradesh v Singhara Singh and Ors.

AIR 1964 Supreme Court 358

Where a statute prescribes a particular manner or mode for doing an act (such as recording a confession or statement before a specified authority), that act must be done in that manner alone, and no other; a magistrate empowered to record a statement in a particular way cannot delegate that function or record it through an unauthorised alternative procedure.

mode-prescribed-by-statutedelegationexclusive-proceduremagistrate-powers
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Sultan Brothers v CIT

(1964) 51 ITR 353 (Supreme Court)

Whether income from letting out property is 'Income from House Property' or 'Business Income' depends on the intention: if letting is the business, it may still be House Property income.

taxation-lawletting-as-businesshead-of-incomehouse-property
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

University of Mysore v CD Govinda Rao

AIR 1965 Supreme Court 491

Quo warranto lies against the holder of a public office of substantive character created by statute; the appointment is examined for compliance with statutory requirements.

administrative-lawquo-warrantopublic-officesem-3
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Valia Peedikakkandi Katheessa Umma v Pathakkalan Narayanath Kunhamu

All India Reporter 1964 Supreme Court 275; (1964) 4 Supreme Court Reports 549; judgment of 23 August 1963

The strict rule requiring delivery of possession to one of the four recognised guardians of a minor's property is not a condition of validity in two situations: a gift by a husband to his wife, and a gift to a minor who has no guardian of the property in existence. In such cases a gift accepted by the mother, or by another near relative or even a stranger having charge of the minor, is valid, provided there is a clear and manifest intention to make the gift and the donor divests himself of ownership and possession. Registration does not cure absence of delivery of possession.

muslim-lawgifthibaminor-doneeguardian-of-propertyconstructive-deliveryregistrationqiyas
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1964

Workmen of Subong Tea Estate v Outgoing Management of Subong Tea Estate

AIR 1964 Supreme Court 903

Retrenchment under Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act does not include termination of service by way of transfer of the undertaking, or termination resulting from non-renewal of a contract of employment on its expiry, or termination due to continued ill-health of the workman, since these are expressly excluded from the definition of retrenchment.

retrenchmentsection-2-ooexclusionstransfer-of-undertaking
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1964

Ziauddin Ahmad v. Md. Usman

AIR 1964 Allahabad 547

Two conditions must be satisfied for appointment of a receiver under Order XL: (1) the applicant must establish a prima facie case, and (2) the balance of convenience must favour appointment. Mere assertion of mismanagement without evidence is insufficient.

CPCreceiverorder-XLprima-facie-casebalance-of-conveniencedrastic-remedy
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta

AIR 1963 Supreme Court 449

Test for deceptive similarity: overall impression on average consumer with imperfect recollection; marks compared as whole, not dissected

trademarkdeceptive-similarityaverage-consumerimperfect-recollection
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

Bhikusa Yamasa Kshatriya v. Union of India

AIR 1963 Supreme Court 1591

The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 is a welfare legislation aimed at protecting workers from exploitation. The fixation of minimum wages by the government is not an encroachment on the employer's fundamental right to carry on business (Article 19(1)(g)). It is a reasonable restriction in the interest of the general public.

minimum-wagesarticle-19reasonable-restrictionwelfare-legislationemployer-fundamental-rights
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

Fateh Chand v Balkishan Dass

AIR 1963 Supreme Court 1405

Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act abolishes the English law distinction between penalty and liquidated damages; a party can recover only reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount named in the contract, and must show loss unless it is impossible to prove.

section-74liquidated-damagespenaltyforfeitureearnest-money
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

Hindustan Times Ltd. v. Their Workmen

AIR 1963 Supreme Court 1332

Fair wage is determined by the industry-cum-region formula. Comparable wages in similar industries in the same region set the benchmark for fair wage fixation.

fair-wageindustry-cum-regioncomparable-wageswage-fixation
Read case brief
Madras High Court1963

In Re: P, An Advocate

AIR 1963 Madras 298

An advocate who misappropriates client's funds is guilty of grossest professional misconduct and liable to be struck off the roll.

professional-ethicsmisconductmisappropriationclient-fundsremoval
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

In Re: The Sea Customs Act, 1878, Section 20(2)

All India Reporter 1963 Supreme Court 1760; (1964) 3 Supreme Court Reports 787

The mutual tax immunities in Articles 285 and 289 are confined to taxes on property and on income as such. They do not extend to indirect taxes such as customs duty and excise duty, where the taxable event is import or manufacture rather than ownership of property.

constitutional-lawarticle-285article-289article-143tax-immunityindirect-taxcustoms-dutyfinancial-relations
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar v LIC of India

AIR 1963 Supreme Court 1185

Distinguished ultra vires the COMPANY (void) from ultra vires the DIRECTORS (voidable); acts within objects but beyond directors' authority are merely irregular, not void

ultra-viresdirectors-authorityirregularvoidabledistinction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

M.S. Anirudhan v Thomco's Bank Ltd

AIR 1963 Supreme Court 746

Section 133 discharges a surety only where the variance in the terms of the principal contract is material and not beneficial to him. An alteration which reduces the surety's liability, or is otherwise immaterial, does not discharge him.

guaranteesuretysection-133variancedischargematerial-alteration
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

Ram Sarup v Munshi

AIR 1963 Supreme Court 553

A registered sale deed carries a strong presumption of validity as to title; the burden of proving it to be a sham or nominal lies on the party challenging it

title-deedsregistered-documentspresumption-of-validitytransfer-of-property
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

Somawanti v State of Punjab

AIR 1963 Supreme Court 151

The adequacy of compensation in land acquisition is not justiciable; courts can only examine whether compensation has been provided, not whether it is adequate

land-acquisitionpublic-purposecompensationadequacyArticle-31non-justiciability
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

State of West Bengal v Union of India

All India Reporter 1963 Supreme Court 1241; (1964) 1 Supreme Court Reports 371

The Indian Constitution is not federal in the classical sense. It is not the result of a compact between sovereign units, and the States have no independent sovereign existence. Parliament is competent to legislate for the acquisition of property belonging to a State, and a suit under Article 131 requires a dispute involving a legal right.

constitutional-lawarticle-131federalismquasi-federalunitary-biasacquisition-of-state-propertyoriginal-jurisdiction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1963

Western India Match Co. v. Workers

AIR 1963 Supreme Court 1698

Certified standing orders have statutory force and bind the employer equally; employer's action contrary to standing orders is void

standing-ordersbinding-effectvoid-dismissalemployer-bound
Read case brief
Jammu & Kashmir High Court1962

Abdul Rehman v. Mohd. Ruldu

AIR 1962 J&K 59

Section 15 of the Limitation Act (exclusion of time during injunction/stay) requires that the restraint was imposed on the plaintiff by or on behalf of the defendant. An injunction obtained by the plaintiff against someone else does not trigger the exclusion.

limitation-actsection-15injunctionstayexclusion-of-timerestraint-on-plaintiff
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1962

Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd v State of Rajasthan

All India Reporter 1962 Supreme Court 1406; (1963) 1 Supreme Court Reports 491

Regulatory measures, and compensatory taxes levied for the use of trading facilities, do not fall within the purview of Article 301 at all and need no justification under Article 302 or Article 304. Such levies do not hamper trade but facilitate it.

constitutional-lawarticle-301compensatory-taxregulatory-measureinterstate-trademotor-vehicles-taxpart-xiii
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1962

Bangalore Woollen, Cotton and Silk Mills Co. Ltd. v Its Workmen

AIR 1962 Supreme Court 1363

An Industrial Tribunal, in adjudicating a reference, must confine itself to the specific matters within the terms of reference made by the appropriate government under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act; a tribunal that travels beyond the scope of the reference and decides matters not referred to it exceeds its jurisdiction.

tribunal-jurisdictionterms-of-referencesection-10jurisdictional-limit
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1962

Bhikraj Jaipuria v Union of India

All India Reporter 1962 Supreme Court 113; (1962) 2 Supreme Court Reports 880

The constitutional form prescribed for government contracts is mandatory and not directory. A contract that does not comply is void and unenforceable against the Government, and because the requirement exists for the protection of the public it cannot be waived, nor can the contract be ratified by conduct.

constitutional-lawarticle-299government-contractsmandatory-formratificationestoppelvoid-contract
Read case brief
International Court of Justice1962

Certain Expenses of the United Nations (Advisory Opinion)

ICJ Advisory Opinion [1962] ICJ Rep 151

The General Assembly has competence to authorise peacekeeping operations; their costs are expenses of the Organisation binding on all member states under Article 17(2) of the United Nations Charter.

PILunited-nationspeacekeepinggeneral-assemblyarticle-17
Read case brief
Chancery Division1962

Jones v Lipman

[1962] 1 Weekly Law Reports 832

The corporate veil will be lifted to grant specific performance where a person transfers property to a company he controls in order to defeat the purchaser's equitable interest

lifting-the-veilspecific-performancealter-egosham-device
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1962

Jumma Masjid Mercara v Kodimaniandra Deviah

AIR 1962 Supreme Court 847

S.43 (feeding the grant) operates automatically; interest passes to original transferee the moment transferor acquires title; S.43 does not conflict with S.6(a)

property-lawfeeding-the-grantestoppelsection-43section-6a
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1962

Lachman Singh v. Hazari Lal

AIR 1962 All 477

When property is the dominant consideration and money merely supplementary to equalize values, the transaction is an exchange, not a sale

property-lawTPAsection-118exchangedominant-consideration
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1962

Manohar Lal Chopra v. Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal

AIR 1962 Supreme Court 527

Section 151 CPC affirms the inherent power of civil courts to do justice, but this power cannot be exercised to nullify or override express provisions of the CPC. Inherent power supplements the Code; it does not supplant it.

CPCsection-151inherent-powersexhaustive-codesupplementary-power
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division (England)1962

Mercantile Credit Co Ltd v Garrod

[1962] 3 All England Law Reports 1103

A partner's implied authority is measured by what is usual in a business of that kind as it appears to outsiders. A restriction contained in the partnership agreement but unknown to the third party does not limit the firm's liability.

partnershipsection-19implied-authorityapparent-authoritysleeping-partnerthird-parties
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1962

Purushothaman Nambudiri v State of Kerala

All India Reporter 1962 Supreme Court 694; (1962) Supplementary (1) Supreme Court Reports 753

Once a Bill has been passed by the House and submitted for assent, the legislative process so far as the House is concerned is complete, and the Bill does not lapse on a subsequent dissolution of the Assembly. The Constitution prescribes no time limit within which assent must be given under Article 200 or Article 201.

constitutional-lawarticle-200article-201assentdissolutionstate-legislaturelapse-of-bills
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (five Judge Constitution Bench)1962

Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb v State of Bombay

All India Reporter 1962 Supreme Court 853; (1962) Supplementary (2) Supreme Court Reports 496; judgment of 9 January 1962

On the faith and tenets of the Dawoodi Bohras, the exercise of the power of excommunication by the religious head on religious grounds forms part of the management of the community's affairs in matters of religion, so a statute invalidating even such excommunication infringes Art.26(b). Arts.25 and 26 protect not merely doctrines and beliefs but acts done in pursuance of religion, and what is an essential part of a religion is judged in the light of its doctrine and of what the community itself regards as part of its religion. The Art.26(b) right is not subject to the preservation of civil rights.

muslim-lawarticle-25article-26excommunicationdawoodi-bohrareligious-denominationessential-religious-practiceconstitution-bench
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1962

State of Rajasthan v. Vidyawati

AIR 1962 Supreme Court 933

State is vicariously liable for torts of its servants committed in non-sovereign functions; no justification for government immunity in a welfare state.

administrative-lawstate-liabilityvicarious-liabilitytortious-liabilitywelfare-state
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1962

State of West Bengal v. B.K. Mondal & Sons

AIR 1962 Supreme Court 779

Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act applies even against the government; where a person lawfully performs work for another (including the State) who enjoys the benefit, the beneficiary must compensate regardless of the absence of a valid contract.

quasi-contractSection-70government-liabilitynon-gratuitous-actunjust-enrichmentIndian-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1962

U. Unichoyi v. State of Kerala

AIR 1962 Supreme Court 12

Most authoritative judicial statement of the three-tier wage framework (minimum, fair, living). Individual employer hardship is irrelevant to minimum wage fixation.

minimum-wagefair-wageliving-wagethree-tierarticle-43
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Ardeshir H. Bhiwandiwala v State of Bombay

AIR 1962 Supreme Court 29

The definition of 'factory' under Section 2(m) of the Factories Act, 1948 turns on whether a 'manufacturing process' is carried on with the aid of power, and the concept of 'manufacturing process' is broadly construed to include activities that transform or treat raw material into a different or usable form, such as the conversion of seawater into salt through natural processes assisted by mechanical means, bringing such premises within the scope of the Act.

definition-of-factorymanufacturing-processsection-2-mfactories-act
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Atiabari Tea Co Ltd v State of Assam

All India Reporter 1961 Supreme Court 232; (1961) 1 Supreme Court Reports 809

The freedom under Article 301 is a freedom from restrictions on the movement or transport of goods. A law which imposes a tax that directly and immediately restricts or impedes the free flow of trade falls within Article 301 and must be justified under Article 302 or Article 304. Laws affecting trade only indirectly are outside it.

constitutional-lawarticle-301article-304interstate-tradedirect-and-immediate-restrictionpresidential-sanctionpart-xiii
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Babulal Parate v. State of Maharashtra

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 884

Preventive detention and orders under S.144 CrPC (now S.163 BNSS) are valid even without prior hearing; the nature of preventive action requires swiftness. However, such orders must be reasonable, temporary, proportionate, and subject to judicial review.

preventive-powersS.163-BNSSpublic-ordernatural-justiceArt-19
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Banwarilal Agarwalla v. State of Bihar

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 849

Where laying before legislature is mandatory condition for validity of delegated legislation, rules not laid are void ab initio

administrative-lawdelegated-legislationlayingmandatory-procedurelegislative-control
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Burrakur Coal Co. v. Union of India

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 954

Headings or titles prefixed to sections or groups of sections in a statute can be used as aids to construction. They indicate the general drift of the provisions grouped under them, though they cannot control the plain words of a section.

headingsinternal-aidssection-titlesgeneral-driftconstruction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

CIT v Girdhari Lal

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 1124

Compensation received on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land is not 'income' under the Income Tax Act.

taxation-lawcapital-receiptcompulsory-acquisitionagricultural-land
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Commissioner of Income Tax v Dwarkadas Khetan and Co

All India Reporter 1961 Supreme Court 680; [1961] 2 Supreme Court Reports 821

A minor cannot be admitted as a full partner. Section 30 permits only admission to the benefits of partnership, and a deed which makes a minor a full partner with rights of management is invalid to that extent and cannot be read down.

partnershipsection-30minorcapacitybenefits-of-partnershipregistration
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Daryao v. State of Uttar Pradesh

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 1457

The principle of res judicata applies to writ proceedings. A writ petition dismissed on merits by the High Court under Article 226 bars a subsequent petition before the Supreme Court under Article 32 on the same grounds.

CPCres-judicatasection-11writ-petitionarticle-32article-226constitutional-remedyfinality
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division1961

Fisher v. Bell

[1961] 1 Queen's Bench 394

Literal Rule applied strictly. Display of goods in a shop window is an invitation to treat, not an "offer for sale." Shopkeeper acquitted of offering a flick-knife for sale.

literal-ruleoffer-for-saleinvitation-to-treatflick-knifestrict-construction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Ganga Dutt Murarka v. Kartik Chunder Das

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 1067

Forfeiture of lease requires both breach by lessee AND positive election by lessor to terminate; it does not operate automatically on breach

property-lawTPAsection-111leaseforfeitureelectionlandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Kashinathsa Yamosa Kabadi v. Narsingsa Bhaskarsa Kabadi

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 1077

Appointment of a receiver is a drastic remedy and must be exercised sparingly. A receiver should not be appointed merely because the property is disputed; there must be danger of loss or dissipation requiring protective intervention.

CPCreceiverorder-XLdrastic-remedysparingly-exerciseddisputed-property
Read case brief
Privy Council1961

Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd

[1961] Appeal Cases 12

A person who is the controlling shareholder and governing director of a company can also be an employee of that company

separate-legal-entityone-man-companyemployee-directordual-capacity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Padam Sen v. State of Uttar Pradesh

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 218

Exemptions from attachment under Section 60 CPC must be construed strictly. A claimed exemption must fall squarely within the statutory category. Courts cannot extend exemptions by analogy.

CPCexecutionattachmentsection-60exemptionsstrict-construction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Purushottam Dass Dalmia v. State of West Bengal

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 1589

Jurisdiction of a court depends on the nature and gravity of the offence. The power of a Magistrate to try an offence is limited by the sentence he can impose. If the offence warrants punishment beyond his powers, the case must be committed to the Court of Session.

jurisdictionmagistrate-powerssentence-limitationcommitmentS.21-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

Raje Anandrao v. Shamrao

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 1206

Interest created for unborn person must be the whole remaining interest; a life estate to unborn violates S.13 TPA

property-lawTPAsection-13unborn-personwhole-interest
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

State of MP v Baldeo Prasad

AIR 1961 Supreme Court 293

The nature of sanction must match the branch of law: civil breach attracts civil sanctions; criminal sanctions require criminal process

sanctionscivil-criminalcontemptimprisonmentclassification
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1961

State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh

AIR 1961 SC 493

The minister's claim of State privilege under S.123 IEA (now S.130 BSA) is not conclusive; the court has power to inspect documents to determine whether the privilege claim is justified.

evidence-lawprivilegestate-privilegeunpublished-official-recordssection-123
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1960

Babulal Parate v State of Bombay

AIR 1960 Supreme Court 51

Parliament's power under Article 3 to form new states or alter boundaries does not require a special majority under Art.368; such laws are passed by simple majority and are not 'amendments' to the Constitution.

article-3article-4article-368reorganisation-of-statessimple-majority
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1960

CIT v Nandlal Gandalal

(1960) 40 ITR 1 (Supreme Court)

Profit on sale of silver by a money-lender is taxable as business income if silver constitutes stock-in-trade.

taxation-lawstock-in-tradebusiness-incomesale-profit
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division (England)1960

D F Mount Ltd v Jay and Jay (Provisions) Co Ltd

[1960] 1 Queen's Bench 159; [1959] 3 All England Law Reports 307

Where a buyer in possession of goods or documents of title with the seller's consent transfers the document to a person who takes it in good faith and for value, that transferee obtains a good title. The unpaid seller's lien and right of stoppage in transit are defeated as against him.

sale-of-goodssection-30section-53unpaid-sellerstoppage-in-transitdocuments-of-titlenemo-datdelivery-order
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1960

Gohar Begam v Suggi alias Nazma Begam

All India Reporter 1960 Supreme Court 93; (1960) 1 Supreme Court Reports 597; judgment of 27 August 1959

Under Muhammadan law the mother of an illegitimate female infant is entitled to its custody, so refusal to restore the child to her amounts to illegal detention. A dispute as to the child's paternity is irrelevant to the application. The existence of an alternative remedy under the Guardians and Wards Act is no justification for refusing relief of the nature of habeas corpus, and the Supreme Court will interfere where the High Court's discretion was not judicially exercised.

muslim-lawcustodyhizanatillegitimate-childmotherhabeas-corpusguardians-and-wards-actwelfare-of-minor
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1960

Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India

AIR 1960 Supreme Court 554

Delegated legislation must fall within four corners of enabling provision; rules exceeding statutory scope are ultra vires and void

administrative-lawdelegated-legislationultra-viressubstantive-ultra-vires
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (Presidential Reference under Article 143)1960

In Re: The Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves

AIR 1960 Supreme Court 845

The Preamble is not a part of the Constitution and is not enforceable in a court of law, though it can be used as an aid to interpretation when the language of a provision is ambiguous; cession of Indian territory to a foreign state requires a constitutional amendment under Article 368, not merely ordinary legislation.

preamblearticle-143cession-of-territoryarticle-368presidential-reference
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1960

Itwari v Smt Asghari

All India Reporter 1960 Allahabad 684; 1960 Allahabad Law Journal 523; judgment of 29 August 1959

Muslim law tolerates but does not encourage polygamy, and confers no absolute right on a husband to compel the first wife to share his consortium in all circumstances. A suit for restitution of conjugal rights is enforcement of a right under a civil contract, and the court sits as a mixed court of equity, so relief may be refused where the plaintiff's conduct is unworthy or the suit mala fide. Under modern social conditions the very act of taking a second wife raises a presumption of cruelty to the first, and the onus shifts to the husband to prove that his second marriage involved no insult or cruelty to her.

muslim-lawpolygamycrueltyrestitution-of-conjugal-rightspresumption-of-crueltymixed-court-of-equitysecond-marriage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1960

Management of Kairbetta Estate v Rajamanickam

AIR 1960 Supreme Court 893

A 'lockout' under Section 2(l) of the Industrial Disputes Act is the employer's counterpart to a strike by workmen, namely the closing of a place of employment, suspension of work, or refusal to continue employing workers, undertaken to compel the workers to accept the employer's terms; a lockout that is not a genuine response to an industrial dispute, or is punitive/retaliatory rather than a bona fide part of collective bargaining pressure, may be treated as illegal.

lockoutsection-2-lemployer-counterpart-to-strikebona-fide
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1960

R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab

AIR 1960 Supreme Court 866

Three categories where High Court should quash criminal proceedings: no legal evidence, evidence manifestly inadequate, allegations do not constitute offence in law.

quashinginherent-powersearly-authorityS.528-BNSSsem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1960

Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Deorajin Debi

AIR 1960 SC 941

Constructive res judicata: every matter which might and ought to have been made a ground of defence or attack in the former suit shall be deemed to have been so made; a party cannot split his case or reserve grounds for subsequent proceedings.

evidence-lawres-judicataconstructive-res-judicatasection-11-cpc
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1960

Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Deorajin Debi

AIR 1960 Supreme Court 941

Res judicata applies not only between separate suits but also between different stages of the same proceeding. An interlocutory order on a point, if not challenged, becomes final and cannot be reopened at a later stage.

CPCres-judicatasection-11interlocutory-orderfinalitypreliminary-decreestages-of-suit
Read case brief
Punjab High Court1960

Shivdev Singh v. Sucha Singh

AIR 1960 Punjab 266

A charge under S.100 requires specific property to be made liable for payment; a vague direction to pay from 'property' is not a charge

property-lawTPAsection-100chargespecific-property
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division1960

Smith v. Hughes

[1960] 1 Weekly Law Reports 830

Mischief Rule applied. Prostitutes soliciting from balconies and windows held to be soliciting "in a street" because the mischief was harassment of passersby, regardless of physical location.

mischief-rulesolicitingstreetpurposiveharassment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1960

State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha

AIR 1960 Supreme Court 610

A government hospital where employer-employee relations exist constitutes an 'industry' regardless of charitable or governmental nature

industry-definitionhospitalgovernment-bodycharitable-purpose
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1959

Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. Their Workmen

AIR 1959 Supreme Court 967

Bonus is a deferred wage and a share in the prosperity of the enterprise. The Full Bench Formula provides the framework for computing available surplus from which bonus is payable.

bonusfull-bench-formuladeferred-wageprosperity-sharingavailable-surplus
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1959

Bhinka v. Charan Singh

AIR 1959 Supreme Court 960

Headings or chapter titles given to groups of sections indicate the general drift of the provisions grouped under them. They may be relied upon to determine the sense of the section where the language is ambiguous, but they cannot control the plain meaning of express words.

headingschapter-titlesinternal-aidsgeneral-driftambiguity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1959

CIT v. Calcutta Co Ltd

(1959) 37 Income Tax Reports 1 (SC)

A single transaction of purchase and sale of land can constitute an 'adventure in the nature of trade' taxable as business income, depending on intention at time of purchase.

taxationPGBPadventure-in-nature-of-tradesingle-transactioncapital-gains-vs-business
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1959

Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya

AIR 1959 Supreme Court 781

A wagering agreement under Section 30 ICA is void but not illegal; collateral transactions to a wager are therefore enforceable. A partnership formed for the purpose of wagering is valid because the object of the partnership (wagering) is not 'forbidden by law' under Section 23.

wageringvoid-not-illegalSection-30Section-23collateral-transactionspartnershipIndian-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1959

M S M Sharma v Sri Krishna Sinha

All India Reporter 1959 Supreme Court 395; (1959) Supplementary (1) Supreme Court Reports 806

The privileges conferred by Article 194(3), and correspondingly by Article 105(3), are themselves provisions of the Constitution and prevail over the fundamental right in Article 19(1)(a). They do not, however, prevail over Article 21.

constitutional-lawprivilegesarticle-194article-105article-19freedom-of-speechcontempt-of-housesearchlight-case
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1959

Phulbari Tea Estate v. Workmen

AIR 1959 Supreme Court 1111

Tribunal retains jurisdiction to examine proportionality of punishment even when domestic inquiry is valid and misconduct proven; can reduce disproportionate punishment

proportionalitypunishmenttribunal-powermisconductdismissal
Read case brief
House of Lords1959

Scottish Cooperative Wholesale Society v Meyer

[1959] Appeal Cases 324

Conduct that is burdensome, harsh, and wrongful to minority shareholders, using majority power to benefit the majority at minority's expense, constitutes oppression

oppressionminority-protectiondiversion-of-businesssubsidiarybuyout
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1959

Tahsildar Singh v. State of UP

AIR 1959 SC 1012

A document used to refresh memory under S.159 IEA (now S.152 BSA) is not substantive evidence; the oral testimony of the witness is the evidence, and the document is merely an aid to memory.

evidence-lawrefreshing-memorysection-159substantive-evidencewitness-testimony
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Badridas Daga v CIT

(1958) 34 Income Tax Reports 10 (SC)

Interest on securities held as stock-in-trade is taxable under 'Profits and Gains of Business' and not under 'Income from Other Sources'.

taxation-lawhead-of-incomeinterest-on-securitiesbusiness-income
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Bishan Singh v. Khazan Singh

AIR 1958 SC 838

A tenant who has been let into possession by a landlord is estopped under S.116 IEA (now S.116 BSA) from denying the landlord's title at the commencement of the tenancy during the continuance of the tenancy.

evidence-lawestoppeltenant-estoppelsection-116
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1958

Brownsea Haven Properties Ltd. v. Poole Corporation

[1958] Chancery 574

The noscitur a sociis rule (a word is known by the company it keeps) requires that ambiguous words be read in the context of surrounding words. Words in a list take colour from each other, and each should be interpreted consistently with the overall context of the associated terms.

noscitur-a-sociisassociated-wordscontextlist-interpretationsurrounding-words
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Crown Aluminium Works v. Their Workmen

1958 Supreme Court Reports 651 / AIR 1958 Supreme Court 30

An industry that cannot pay minimum wages has no right to exist. Employer's inability to pay is no defence against the minimum wage obligation.

minimum-wagesinability-to-payright-to-existfair-wage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Express Newspapers (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Union of India

AIR 1958 Supreme Court 578

Fair wage must consider the industry's capacity to pay. A wage fixation that forces an employer to close is an unreasonable restriction on Article 19(1)(g), but minimum wage remains inviolable.

fair-wagecapacity-to-payworking-journalistswage-boardarticle-19
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

In Re: The Kerala Education Bill, 1957

All India Reporter 1958 Supreme Court 956; (1959) Supreme Court Reports 995

Article 143(1) uses the word 'may', so the Supreme Court has a discretion and is not obliged to answer a reference. It will decline where the questions are vague, political or socio-economic, or where an answer would serve no useful purpose. On the merits, several provisions of the Bill were held inconsistent with the rights of minorities under Article 30.

constitutional-lawarticle-143advisory-jurisdictionarticle-30minority-institutionspresidential-referencediscretion
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Parshotam Lal Dhingra v Union of India

All India Reporter 1958 Supreme Court 36; (1958) Supreme Court Reports 828

Article 311(2) applies only where the action amounts to punishment. The two indicia of punishment are whether the servant had a right to hold the post, and whether the order visits him with evil consequences or casts a stigma. Misconduct which is merely the motive for an order is distinguished from misconduct which is its foundation.

constitutional-lawarticle-311article-310reduction-in-ranktermination-simpliciterstigmamotive-and-foundationprobationer
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Razia Begum v Sahebzadi Anwar Begum

AIR 1958 Supreme Court 886

Courts have discretionary power under Order I Rule 10 CPC to add a party to a suit where that party's presence is necessary to effectually and completely adjudicate upon the questions involved, particularly in matters affecting status (such as a declaration of marriage), even though the applicant may not be a party in the strict sense to the original cause of action.

order-1-rule-10necessary-partyproper-partyaddition-of-partiesdeclaration-of-status
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Saurashtra Salt Manufacturing Co. v. Bai Valu Raja

AIR 1958 Supreme Court 881

Snake bite at workplace arises out of employment where the work environment exposes workers to such risks. Employment need not be the direct cause; increased exposure through employment is sufficient.

compensationsnake-bitearising-out-of-employmentincreased-risksalt-pans
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Seth Ganga Dhar v Shankar Lal

AIR 1958 Supreme Court 770

A clause making property absolutely mortgagee's upon default is a clog on redemption and void; once a mortgage, always a mortgage

property-lawmortgageclog-on-redemptionsection-60once-a-mortgage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Shantabai v. State of Bombay

AIR 1958 Supreme Court 532

Standing timber is movable property; fruit-bearing trees rooted in earth are immovable property under S.3 TPA

property-lawTPAimmovable-propertystanding-timber
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1958

Sri Venkataramana Devaru v. State of Mysore

AIR 1958 Supreme Court 255

Harmonious construction of constitutional provisions requires the specific provision to qualify the general; both continue to operate in their respective spheres

harmonious-constructionconstitutional-interpretationarticle-25article-26article-17temple-entryspecific-vs-general
Read case brief
House of Lords1957

Attorney-General v. Prince Ernest Augustus of Hanover

[1957] Appeal Cases 436

The long title of an Act is part of the Act and may be used as an aid to interpretation. However, where the enacting words are clear and unambiguous, neither the long title nor the preamble can restrict or qualify them.

long-titleinternal-aidspreambleclear-wordslegislative-intent
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division (England)1957

Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee

[1957] 1 Weekly Law Reports 582

A professional is not negligent if their conduct accords with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible, competent body of professional opinion, even if other equally competent professionals might have adopted a different approach.

negligenceprofessional-standardmedical-negligencebolam-test
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

Central Provinces Transport Services Ltd. v Raghunath Gopal Patwardhan

AIR 1957 Supreme Court 104

A dispute concerning the termination or dismissal of a single individual employee, not sponsored or supported by a union or a substantial number of workmen, generally does not qualify as an 'industrial dispute' under Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, unless it acquires a collective character through union or workmen support.

industrial-disputeindividual-disputesection-2kcollective-character
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

CIT v. Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy

AIR 1957 Supreme Court 768

Agriculture requires basic operations (tilling, sowing, planting) on land; spontaneous growth without human effort is not agriculture.

taxationagricultural-incomebasic-operationsdefinition-of-agriculture
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

Garikapati Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhry

AIR 1957 Supreme Court 540

The right of appeal is a substantive right, not merely a procedural one. It vests in a litigant on the date the suit is instituted. A subsequent amendment taking away the right cannot operate retrospectively unless expressly provided.

right-of-appealvested-rightsubstantive-rightretrospectiveno-retrospective-deprivation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

Hariprasad Shivshankar Shukla v A.D. Divelkar

AIR 1957 Supreme Court 121

The closure of an undertaking by an employer is distinct from 'retrenchment' under Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act; termination of services consequent upon a bona fide closure of business does not amount to retrenchment, and workmen so terminated are not entitled to retrenchment compensation under Section 25F merely by virtue of that provision, though this position was later altered by statutory amendment.

retrenchmentsection-2-ooclosure-of-businessstatutory-amendment
Read case brief
Patna High Court1957

Inder Singh v. Parmeshwardhari Singh

AIR 1957 Patna 491

A person is of unsound mind for contractual purposes if, at the time of contracting, they are incapable of understanding the contract and forming a rational judgment of its effect on their interests.

unsound-mindcapacity-to-contractmental-capacity
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

Manak Lal v Dr. Prem Chand Singhvi

AIR 1957 Supreme Court 425

The test for bias disqualifying a tribunal member is not whether actual bias is proved, but whether there is a reasonable apprehension or likelihood of bias in the mind of a reasonable person; even the absence of proof of actual prejudice does not cure a genuine reasonable apprehension of bias.

rule-against-biasreasonable-apprehensionnemo-judexdisqualification
Read case brief
Court of Criminal Appeal (UK)1957

R v. Cunningham

[1957] 2 Queen's Bench 396

'Maliciously' requires actual foresight of the risk (subjective recklessness); mere negligence or inadvertence is insufficient

mens-rearecklessnessmalicesubjective-testcriminal-intent
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

Rajes Kanta Roy v. Santi Debi

AIR 1957 Supreme Court 255

Where enjoyment is postponed to a date certain to arrive (e.g., attaining age), the interest is vested, not contingent

property-lawTPAsection-19vested-interestcertain-eventlandmark
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

Ram Chandra v State of Uttar Pradesh

AIR 1957 Supreme Court 444

The power of a court to summon and compel the attendance of a witness must be exercised judiciously; a witness cannot be repeatedly harassed by successive summons issued without due regard to genuine difficulty or hardship, and courts must balance the need to secure evidence against the legitimate interests and convenience of witnesses.

summoning-of-witnessesjudicious-exercisewitness-convenience
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

Sarwan Singh v. State of Punjab

AIR 1957 SC 637

While S.133 IEA (now S.156 BSA) makes conviction on uncorroborated accomplice testimony technically legal, it is a rule of prudence (almost approaching law) that courts should not convict without corroboration in material particulars implicating the accused.

evidence-lawaccomplicecorroborationsection-133rule-of-prudence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

State of Bombay v R M D Chamarbaugwala

All India Reporter 1957 Supreme Court 699; (1957) Supreme Court Reports 874

A State law is not invalid for affecting persons or property outside the State if there is a sufficient territorial nexus between the State and the subject matter. Two conditions must be satisfied: the connection must be real and not illusory, and the liability sought to be imposed must be pertinent to that connection.

constitutional-lawterritorial-nexusarticle-245extra-territorial-operationprize-competitionlegislative-competenceseverability
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1957

State of Uttar Pradesh v Manbodhan Lal Srivastava

All India Reporter 1957 Supreme Court 912; (1958) Supreme Court Reports 533

The requirement of consultation with the Public Service Commission in Article 320(3) is directory and not mandatory. It confers no right on a public servant, and failure to consult the Commission does not by itself invalidate disciplinary action taken against him.

constitutional-lawarticle-320public-service-commissiondirectoryconsultationdisciplinary-proceedingsservices
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1956

Ananda Behera v. State of Orissa

AIR 1956 Supreme Court 17

Right to catch and carry away fish from a lake is a profit-a-prendre and constitutes an interest in immovable property

property-lawTPAimmovable-propertyfisheryprofit-a-prendre
Read case brief
Permanent Court of Arbitration1956

Lighthouse Case (France v Greece)

23 Indian Law Reports 81 (1956)

Localised treaty obligations attached to specific territory pass automatically to the successor state, regardless of the clean slate principle applicable to other treaties.

PILstate-successionlocalised-obligationsclean-slateVCST
Read case brief
Madras High Court1956

Muthuveerappa Thevar v. Mayandi Thevar

AIR 1956 Madras 248

If price is grossly below market value and possession remains with seller, the transaction is a mortgage disguised as a sale, not a genuine sale

property-lawTPAsection-58conditional-saledisguised-mortgage
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1956

Shambhu Nath Mehra v. State of Ajmer

AIR 1956 SC 404

Under S.106 IEA (now S.106 BSA), when a fact is especially within the knowledge of the accused (such as source of disproportionate assets), the burden of proving it lies on that person.

evidence-lawburden-of-proofsection-106special-knowledgedisproportionate-assets
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1955

Bhikaji Narain Dhakras and Ors. v State of Madhya Pradesh

AIR 1955 Supreme Court 781

A pre-Constitution law that is inconsistent with fundamental rights becomes void only 'to the extent of the inconsistency' under Article 13(1); it is not wiped out permanently, and if the fundamental right is later amended to remove the inconsistency, the law revives without re-enactment. This is the 'doctrine of eclipse.'

article-13doctrine-of-eclipsepre-constitution-lawrevival-of-law
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1955

Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd. v. State of Ajmer

AIR 1955 Supreme Court 33

Minimum Wages Act is constitutionally valid. Securing living wages is a reasonable restriction on freedom of trade under Article 19(6).

minimum-wagesarticle-19constitutional-validityreasonable-restriction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1955

Central Bank of India v Ram Narain

AIR 1955 SC 36

The common law rule that a wife's domicile automatically follows the husband's does not apply with the same rigidity in India; a married woman may acquire a domicile of her own, particularly where the spouses live apart.

domicilemarried-womanindependent-domiciledependent-domicileconflict-of-laws
Read case brief
Bombay High Court1955

CIT v. Bai Navajbai

AIR 1955 Bombay 4

Interest for unborn person is valid only when created through the same instrument that creates the prior interest

property-lawTPAsection-13unborn-personsame-transfer
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1955

Girija Datt v Gangotri

AIR 1955 Allahabad 571

Under S.13, unborn person must receive the whole remaining interest; life estate to unborn is void

property-lawtransfer-to-unbornsection-13whole-interest-rule
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1955

H.N. Rishbud v. State of Delhi

AIR 1955 Supreme Court 196

Defective investigation does not automatically vitiate trial. Investigation and trial are distinct stages; irregularity in investigation does not per se invalidate proceedings unless material prejudice is shown.

investigationdefecttrialprejudiceirregularitysem-5
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1955

Hari Vishnu Kamath v Ahmad Ishaque

AIR 1955 Supreme Court 233

Certiorari corrects jurisdictional errors and errors of law on the face of the record; it does not correct errors of fact made within jurisdiction.

administrative-lawcertiorarierror-of-lawsem-3
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1955

Jugal Kishore v Raw Cotton Co

AIR 1955 Supreme Court 376

Assignment of actionable claim is valid between parties upon execution; notice to debtor is for enforcement and priority, not validity

property-lawactionable-claimassignmentnoticesection-130
Read case brief
Italian-United States Conciliation Commission1955

Merge Claim (United States of America v Italy)

(1955) 14 RIAA 236

Where a person holds dual nationality, the state of dominant and effective nationality prevails for diplomatic protection purposes; the other state of nationality cannot be the respondent.

PILdual-nationalitydiplomatic-protectioneffective-nationalitygenuine-link
Read case brief
International Court of Justice1955

Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v Guatemala)

ICJ Reports 1955, p 4

For diplomatic protection, there must be a genuine and effective link between the national and the protecting state; nationality of convenience acquired without real connection cannot be opposed to third states.

PILnationalitygenuine-linkdiplomatic-protectionnationality-of-convenience
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1955

Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab

AIR 1955 Supreme Court 549

Indian Constitution does not embody rigid separation of powers; executive power is co-extensive with legislative power and includes residuary authority

administrative-lawseparation-of-powersexecutive-powerwelfare-state
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1955

Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, Kotah

AIR 1955 Supreme Court 425

Procedural law is the handmaid of justice, not its mistress. Technical breaches of procedure should not defeat substantive rights unless they cause real prejudice.

CPCprocedural-lawhandmaid-of-justiceex-partenatural-justiceprocedure-not-rigid
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1954

CIT v Ogale Glass Works

(1954) 25 ITR 529 (Supreme Court)

Interest on deposits made as a condition of obtaining a contract is assessable under 'Income from Other Sources' and not as business income.

taxation-lawinterestdepositshead-of-income
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1954

Dhakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd v Commissioner of Income Tax

AIR 1954 Supreme Court 564

Adequate notice and a reasonable opportunity of being heard must be given before an adverse order is passed; the principles of natural justice apply to quasi-judicial proceedings affecting corporate entities.

natural-justicenoticeopportunityquasi-judicialprocedural-fairness
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1954

Newborne v Sensolid (Great Britain) Ltd

[1954] 1 Queen's Bench 45

A contract signed by a promoter solely as 'agent' of a non-existent company is a nullity; no principal exists, so no agency exists, and no one is bound

pre-incorporation-contractnullityagentpromoterno-principal
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1954

Pandit Chunchun Jha v Ebadat Ali

AIR 1954 Supreme Court 345

Test for distinguishing mortgage by conditional sale from genuine sale: real intention of parties; existence of debtor-creditor relationship

property-lawmortgageconditional-salesection-58bintention-test
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1954

Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co

AIR 1954 Supreme Court 44

Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act exhaustively governs frustration in India; 'impossibility' under Section 56 is used in a practical sense (impracticability), not literally; English doctrines of frustration cannot be imported beyond the statutory framework.

frustrationSection-56impossibilityimpracticabilitysupervening-eventIndian-lawrequisition
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1954

State of West Bengal v Subodh Gopal Bose

AIR 1954 Supreme Court 92

Right to property is a right in rem: available against the whole world; every person has a duty not to interfere with the owner's property

right-in-rempropertyArt-31fundamental-rightsduty
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1954

Surendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

AIR 1954 Supreme Court 194

A judgment of conviction must be a speaking judgment. The judge must marshal the evidence, discuss the rival contentions, and give reasons for accepting or rejecting testimony. A judgment that merely states the conclusion without reasons fails the test of a valid judgment.

judgmentreasoningspeaking-orderS.392-BNSSfair-trialsem-5
Read case brief
Calcutta High Court1953

Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd. v. Corporation of Calcutta

AIR 1953 Calcutta 549

Punctuation is not a controlling factor in statutory interpretation but may be looked at as a minor aid where the meaning is otherwise doubtful. The court gives effect to the sense of the provision rather than mechanical reliance on punctuation marks, which may have been carelessly used by the draftsman.

punctuationinternal-aidsminor-aidstatutory-constructiondraftsman-error
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1953

K C Gajapati Narayan Deo v State of Orissa

All India Reporter 1953 Supreme Court 375; (1954) Supreme Court Reports 1

The doctrine of colourable legislation has nothing to do with the bona fides or mala fides of the legislature. The only question is one of competence: whether the legislature, while purporting to act within its power, has in substance transgressed it. If the subject matter is within its competence, the motive for enacting the law is irrelevant.

constitutional-lawcolourable-legislationlegislative-competencemotiveagricultural-income-taxestates-abolitionfraud-on-the-constitution
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1953

Kalawati and Anr. v State of Himachal Pradesh

AIR 1953 Supreme Court 131

Art.20(2) double jeopardy protection applies only where the person has been both 'prosecuted AND punished' for the same offence; a mere prior acquittal does not trigger the bar, and an appeal against an acquittal is a continuation of the same prosecution, not a fresh one.

article-20-2double-jeopardyprosecuted-and-punishedacquittal
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1953

Maqbool Hussain v State of Bombay

AIR 1953 Supreme Court 325

Proceedings before a Sea Customs authority, resulting in confiscation of goods, do not amount to a 'prosecution' before a 'court or judicial tribunal' for Art.20(2); therefore, a subsequent criminal prosecution for the same conduct does not violate double jeopardy protection.

article-20-2double-jeopardycourt-or-judicial-tribunalsea-customs-actconfiscation
Read case brief
International Court of Justice1953

Minquiers and Ecrehos Case (France v United Kingdom)

ICJ Reports 1953, p 47

When both parties rely on ancient historical title, the court prefers the party demonstrating actual exercise of effective sovereignty in modern times through administrative and judicial acts.

PILterritorial-sovereigntyeffective-administrationhistorical-title
Read case brief
Madras High Court1953

Narayanan v. Lakshmi Ammal

AIR 1953 Madras 420

Transferee of actionable claim takes subject to all defenses available against the transferor, including prior payment

property-lawTPAsection-132actionable-claimequities
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1953

Poppatlal Shah v. State of Madras

AIR 1953 Supreme Court 274

A proviso must be construed with reference to the main enactment to which it is a proviso. It carves out an exception to the main provision and cannot be used to widen the scope of the main section.

provisointernal-aidsexceptionscope-limitationconstruction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1953

Ram Kissendas Dhanuka v Satya Charan Law

AIR 1953 Supreme Court 365

An undischarged insolvent is automatically disqualified from holding office as director; the office is vacated by operation of law without requiring any formal removal.

directorsdisqualificationinsolvencyvacation-of-office
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1952

Anwar Ali Sarkar v. State of West Bengal

AIR 1952 Supreme Court 75

A law providing for trial by special courts without intelligible differentia between persons tried by special courts and ordinary courts violates Art.14. The State cannot deny a citizen the right to trial by established courts without reasonable classification.

special-courtsarticle-14classificationequal-protectionfair-trial
Read case brief
House of Lords1952

East End Dwellings Co. Ltd. v. Finsbury Borough Council

[1952] Appeal Cases 109

When a statute creates a legal fiction (by use of words "shall be deemed"), the court must carry the fiction to its logical conclusion but not beyond the purpose for which the fiction was created.

legal-fictiondeemedlogical-conclusionscope-limitationstatutory-construction
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1952

N P Ponnuswami v Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency

All India Reporter 1952 Supreme Court 64; (1952) Supreme Court Reports 218

The word 'election' in Article 329(b) is used in the wide sense of the entire process from the notification calling the election to the declaration of the result. No intermediate step, including the rejection of a nomination paper, may be questioned except by an election petition after the result.

constitutional-lawarticle-329election-petitionnominationwrit-jurisdictionelectionsbar-on-courts
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1952

Pukhraj v Bhoorey Lal

AIR 1952 Allahabad 675

For Section 10 CPC to apply, the previously instituted suit must be one where the court has the power to grant the same or substantially the same relief as sought in the later suit; if the earlier court lacks jurisdiction or competence to grant the relief claimed in the subsequent suit, the stay under Section 10 is not attracted.

section-10-cpcsub-judicecourt-of-competent-jurisdictionrelief
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1952

Rameshwar v. State of Rajasthan

AIR 1952 SC 54

There is no legal requirement that a victim of sexual offence must be corroborated, but as a rule of prudence courts seek independent corroboration; a previous consistent statement (FIR) is not independent corroboration but supports credibility under S.157 IEA (now S.151 BSA).

evidence-lawcorroborationsexual-offencesection-157previous-consistent-statementFIR
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1952

State of Bihar v Kameshwar Singh

AIR 1952 Supreme Court 252

Zamindari abolition laws providing for compensation on principles laid down by the legislature are valid; the court will not substitute its own view of adequacy of compensation

zamindari-abolitioncompensationArticle-31Biharagrarian-reform
Read case brief
International Court of Justice1951

Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case (UK v. Norway)

ICJ Reports 1951, p. 116

(1) The baseline for measuring territorial waters may follow the general direction of the coast using straight baselines where the coastline is deeply indented. (2) The 10-mile rule for bays is not a rule of general international law. (3) Economic interests of the coastal population may be considered in delimitation.

law-of-seastraight-baselinesterritorial-watersindented-coastlinefisheries
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1951

Bolton v. Stone

[1951] Appeal Cases 850

A reasonable person calibrates precautions according to the genuine probability and magnitude of a risk, weighed against the burden of further precautions; negligence does not require guarding against every conceivable, however remote, risk.

negligencerisk-utility-balancingstandard-of-care
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1951

Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. Union of India

AIR 1951 Supreme Court 41

A statute may validly single out one enterprise for special treatment (nationalisation/takeover) if there is an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to the object sought. Classification need not be abstract; it can be a "class of one" if circumstances justify.

article-14classificationclass-of-onenationalisationintelligible-differentia
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1951

In Re Delhi Laws Act

AIR 1951 Supreme Court 332

The legislature cannot delegate its essential legislative function; it must lay down legislative policy and guidelines while delegating only ancillary or subordinate functions

delegated-legislationexcessive-delegationlegislative-policyseparation-of-powers
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1951

Keshavan Madhava Menon v State of Bombay

AIR 1951 Supreme Court 128

Article 13(1) operates only prospectively; it renders pre-Constitution laws inconsistent with fundamental rights void only from the date the Constitution commenced (26 January 1950), and does not affect proceedings, rights, or liabilities that had already accrued before that date.

article-13prospective-operationpre-constitution-lawvested-rights
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1951

Mulla v. Sohan Lal

AIR 1951 Allahabad 612

Once a judgment is signed, it cannot be varied or altered except to correct a clerical or arithmetical mistake under the slip rule (Order XX Rule 3). The judge cannot recall and substantively alter a signed judgment.

CPCjudgmentorder-XX-rule-3slip-rulealterationfinality-of-judgmentclerical-error
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1951

Pannalal Jankidas v Mohanlal

AIR 1951 Supreme Court 144

An agent who fails to carry out an express instruction, such as an instruction to insure goods, is liable for the direct consequences of that neglect under Section 212. Compensation received by the principal from an independent source does not reduce the agent's liability.

agencysection-211section-212skill-and-diligencefailure-to-insuredirect-consequences
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1951

R.R. Chari v. State of U.P.

AIR 1951 Supreme Court 207

Taking cognizance under S.190 CrPC (now S.228 BNSS) means the Magistrate takes judicial notice of the commission of an offence. It does not require a formal order or express pronouncement: the act of applying mind to the complaint/report and deciding to proceed constitutes taking cognizance.

cognizanceS.228-BNSSmagistrate-powerstaking-cognizancejudicial-noticesem-5
Read case brief
International Court of Justice1951

Reservations to the Genocide Convention (Advisory Opinion)

ICJ Reports 1951, p. 15

A state may make a reservation to a multilateral treaty provided the reservation is compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty. Incompatible reservations render the reserving state not a party vis-a-vis objecting states.

reservationstreatiesobject-and-purpose-testgenocide-conventionadvisory-opinion
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1951

Rudra Pratap v Badri Narain

AIR 1951 Allahabad 456

Mortgagee in possession must account for rents actually received AND rents that could have been received with due diligence

property-lawmortgagemortgagee-in-possessionsection-76accounting
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1951

Shankari Prasad v Union of India

AIR 1951 Supreme Court 458

Constitutional amendments under Article 368 are not "law" within the meaning of Article 13(2) and therefore cannot be challenged for violating fundamental rights

First-Amendmentzamindari-abolitionArticle-368Article-13constitutional-amendmentfundamental-rights
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1951

Srinivas Ram Kumar v. Mahabir Prasad

AIR 1951 Supreme Court 177

A court cannot decide a matter not covered by the issues framed. Going beyond the issues without notice to parties is an error of jurisdiction. The issues define the battlefield; evidence and arguments must remain within them.

CPCframing-of-issuesorder-XIVbeyond-issueserror-of-jurisdictiontrial-scope
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1951

State of Bombay v F N Balsara

All India Reporter 1951 Supreme Court 318; (1951) Supreme Court Reports 682

In determining legislative competence the court looks to the pith and substance of the enactment, that is its true nature and character. If the law in substance falls within the enacting legislature's field, an incidental encroachment on a forbidden field does not invalidate it.

constitutional-lawpith-and-substancelegislative-competenceseventh-scheduleseverabilityprohibitionincidental-encroachment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1951

State of Madras v Champakam Dorairajan

AIR 1951 Supreme Court 226

Directive Principles cannot override or take precedence over Fundamental Rights where the two conflict; a caste-based reservation policy not backed by a specific constitutional provision violates Art.29(2). This led directly to the First Constitutional Amendment.

directive-principlesfundamental-rightsarticle-29caste-reservationfirst-amendment
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1950

A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras

AIR 1950 Supreme Court 27

Procedure established by law in Art.21 means any enacted law; fairness or reasonableness is not required. (Overruled by Maneka Gandhi, 1978.)

art-21procedure-established-by-lawpreventive-detentionpositivismoverruled
Read case brief
International Court of Justice1950

Asylum Case (Colombia v Peru)

ICJ Reports 1950, p 266

Regional custom requires constant and uniform usage accepted as law by the states concerned; the burden of proof lies on the state invoking the custom.

PILregional-customdiplomatic-asylumopinio-jurisburden-of-proof
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1950

CIT v Keshab Chandra Mandal

AIR 1950 Supreme Court 265

Rental income from agricultural land is agricultural income exempt under S.10(1) only if the land is used for agricultural purposes.

taxation-lawagricultural-incomeexemptionsection-10
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1950

Edwards v Halliwell

[1950] 2 Allahabad English Reports 1064

Four exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle: (1) ultra vires or illegal acts; (2) acts requiring special majority passed by simple majority; (3) fraud on the minority where wrongdoers control the company; (4) infringement of individual membership rights.

minority-rightsexceptionsFoss-v-Harbottleultra-viresfraud-on-minoritypersonal-rights
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India (sitting on a Hyderabad appeal under Art.374(4))1950

Kapore Chand v Kadar Unnissa Begum

1950 Supreme Court Reports 747; All India Reporter 1953 Supreme Court 413; judgment of 12 October 1950

A Muslim widow in possession of her husband's estate in lieu of unpaid dower, whether with the consent of the other heirs or otherwise, is not entitled to priority as against his other unsecured creditors. There is nothing in the nature of dower entitling it to priority. Her lien gives her no priority over other creditors; dower as a debt has priority only over the heirs' claim to have the estate distributed. Possession makes no difference to either proposition.

muslim-lawdowermahrwidows-right-of-retentionunsecured-creditorno-priorityexecution
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1950

Province of Bombay v. Khushaldas Advani

AIR 1950 Supreme Court 222

Administrative action must be intra vires the parent statute; courts have jurisdiction to review whether administration exceeded statutory powers

administrative-lawultra-viresjudicial-reviewintra-viresearliest-cases
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1950

Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras

AIR 1950 Supreme Court 124

Art.32 is itself a fundamental right; the SC cannot refuse a writ petition where a fundamental right is infringed. Freedom of press is part of Art.19(1)(a).

administrative-lawwritsart-32press-freedomguaranteed-remedy
Read case brief
International Court of Justice1949

Corfu Channel Case (UK v. Albania)

ICJ Reports 1949, p. 4

(1) Every state has an obligation not to knowingly allow its territory to be used for acts contrary to the rights of other states. (2) Right of innocent passage through international straits cannot be denied. (3) Circumstantial evidence is admissible in international adjudication.

state-responsibilityinnocent-passageinternational-straitscircumstantial-evidenceterritorial-sovereignty
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1949

Davies v. Swan Motor Co.

[1949] 2 King's Bench 291

Courts weigh both the relative causal potency and the relative blameworthiness of each party's conduct in determining the appropriate proportionate reduction for contributory negligence.

contributory-negligencecomparative-faultapportionment
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1949

Olley v. Marlborough Court Ltd

[1949] 1 King's Bench 532

An exclusion clause displayed after the contract is formed (e.g., a notice inside a hotel room seen only after check-in at reception) cannot be incorporated into the contract; terms must be brought to notice before or at the time of contracting.

exclusion-clauseincorporationnoticetimingstandard-formhotelcontract-formation
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1949

Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v. Newman Industries Ltd

[1949] 2 King's Bench 528

Damages are recoverable if the loss was reasonably foreseeable as a 'serious possibility' or 'real danger' at the time of contracting; imputed knowledge (what a reasonable person in defendant's position would know) suffices where actual knowledge is absent.

damagesremotenessforeseeabilityreasonable-contemplationHadley-v-Baxendaleimputed-knowledgespecial-loss
Read case brief
Bombay High Court (Federal Court on appeal)1949

Western India Automobile Association v Industrial Tribunal, Bombay

AIR 1949 Bombay 141

An industrial tribunal, in adjudicating an industrial dispute, has the power to create new rights and obligations between employer and workmen going beyond the strict terms of the existing contract, since industrial adjudication is not confined to enforcing existing legal rights but extends to settling disputes in a manner that promotes industrial peace.

industrial-adjudicationtribunal-powerscreation-of-new-rightsindustrial-peace
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1947

Read v. J. Lyons and Co. Ltd.

[1947] Appeal Cases 156

The Rylands v Fletcher rule requires an actual escape of the dangerous thing to a place outside the defendant's occupation or control; injury occurring within the defendant's premises does not satisfy this essential requirement.

strict-liabilityrylands-v-fletcherescape-requirement
Read case brief
Oudh Chief Court1946

Anand Bihari Lal v Dinshaw & Co

AIR 1946 Oudh 408

The Turquand rule does not protect a person who has knowledge of the irregularity or where circumstances are suspicious enough to put a reasonable person on inquiry

indoor-managementturquand-ruleexceptionsuspicious-circumstancesindian-law
Read case brief
Nagpur High Court1946

Hiranand v Raoji

AIR 1946 Nagpur 305

Allotment of shares is complete only when the letter of allotment is communicated to the applicant; until communication, no binding contract exists.

allotmentcommunicationcontractshares
Read case brief
House of Lords1946

London and North Eastern Railway Co. v. Berriman

[1946] Appeal Cases 278

Relaying or repairing" a railway line does not include routine maintenance (oiling). Literal Rule applied strictly to deny compensation for worker killed during maintenance work.

literal-rulerelaying-repairingmaintenancerailwaycompensation-denied
Read case brief
Lahore High Court1946

Ram Rattan v. Parma Nand

AIR 1946 Lahore 166

An instrument drawn on a bank payable on demand is a cheque under S.6 regardless of the name given to it; substance prevails over form

chequeS6substance-over-formhundidefinition
Read case brief
Privy Council1944

Bank of Baroda v. Punjab National Bank

AIR 1944 Privy Council 58

Delivery of documents of title to goods (railway receipts) to a bank creates a valid pledge; constructive delivery equals physical delivery

pledgedocuments-of-titleconstructive-deliveryrailway-receiptS172
Read case brief
Bombay High Court1942

Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar v Moreshwar Madan Mantri

AIR 1942 Bombay 302

An indemnity holder need not wait until he has actually paid the loss; once his liability has become absolute he may compel the indemnifier to place him in a position to meet it. Sections 124 and 125 are not exhaustive of the law of indemnity in India.

indemnitysection-124section-125accrual-of-liabilityabsolute-liability
Read case brief
Privy Council1941

Mst Subhani v Nawab

AIR 1941 Privy Council 21

Under Muslim law, a widow's inheritance is her absolute property: she can alienate freely without restriction (unlike pre-2005 Hindu woman's limited estate)

ownershipabsolute-ownershiplimited-ownershipmuslim-lawwidow
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1940

Bishan Dayal v Kesho Prasad

AIR 1940 Allahabad 483

Reasonable care under S.41 requires inquiry into title records; reliance on possession alone is insufficient

property-lawostensible-ownerreasonable-caresection-41due-diligence
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1940

Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne

[1940] Appeal Cases 613

The equitable doctrine of clog on the equity of redemption does not apply to company debentures; a 40-year repayment term in a company mortgage is valid

debenturesclog-on-redemptioncompany-borrowinglong-term-mortgage
Read case brief
Judicial Commissioner's Court, Peshawar1940

Mt Ghulam Kubra Bibi v Mohammad Shafi Mohammad Din

All India Reporter 1940 Peshawar 2

For a valid Muslim marriage the proposal and acceptance must be made at one and the same meeting, by the parties or by persons on their behalf, and the agreement must be witnessed by two adult witnesses. Given the customary mode of solemnising marriages, the whole procedure must be affirmatively proved; a bare assertion by witnesses that they witnessed the nikah, without particulars, is insufficient. Where the girl has attained majority for marriage purposes her own consent is indispensable and cannot be supplied by a grandfather.

muslim-lawmarriagenikahproposal-and-acceptanceijab-qabulwitnessesproof-of-marriageconsent
Read case brief
Madras High Court1938

Kaliaperumal Pillai v Visalakshmi

AIR 1938 Madras 32

Delivery of possession is essential to a bailment. Where the owner resumes possession of the goods, no bailment subsists and the bailee's duty of care under Section 151 does not attach, even though the goods remain physically on his premises.

bailmentsection-148delivery-of-possessionsection-151goldsmith
Read case brief
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council1937

AG Canada v. AG Ontario (Labour Conventions Case)

[1937] Appeal Cases 326

The power to implement treaties in domestic law follows the division of legislative powers in the constitution. In a federal state, the central government cannot legislate on matters within provincial/state competence merely because it has entered a treaty on that subject.

treaty-implementationfederal-statedualismlegislative-competenceILO-conventions
Read case brief
House of Lords1937

Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Crossman

[1937] Appeal Cases 26

The value of shares for estate duty purposes includes all rights attached to them under the Articles of Association, including restrictions on transfer; shares represent a bundle of rights.

sharesvaluationbundle-of-rightsAOA-restrictions
Read case brief
Madras High Court1937

Govind Pillai v Aiyappan

AIR 1937 Madras 228

Substantial compliance with a condition precedent suffices; exact literal performance not required

property-lawcondition-precedentsubstantial-compliancesection-25
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1937

Kashi Prasad v. Chhabi Nath

AIR 1937 Allahabad 287

A condition subsequent that absolutely bars alienation is void; the transferee takes property free of the restraint

property-lawTPAsection-10section-26restraintcondition-subsequent
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1936

Craven-Ellis v. Canons Ltd

[1936] 2 King's Bench 403

Where services are rendered under a contract that turns out to be void (for want of legal formality), the party who rendered the services is entitled to recover reasonable remuneration on a quantum meruit basis: the obligation arises from unjust enrichment, not from contract.

quantum-meruitvoid-contractrestitutionunjust-enrichmentreasonable-remunerationquasi-contract
Read case brief
Privy Council1936

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd

[1936] Appeal Cases 85

A latent defect in goods breaches both the implied condition of fitness for purpose and the implied condition of merchantable quality. Where goods have an obvious use, disclosure of purpose is implied and reliance on the seller is inferred.

sale-of-goodsmerchantable-qualityfitness-for-purposesection-16latent-defectnegligence
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1935

Gopal Saran Narain Singh v CIT

AIR 1935 Privy Council 159

Income from letting of property is taxable under 'Income from House Property' and not as 'Business Income' even if the owner is in the business of letting.

taxation-lawlettinghouse-propertyhead-of-income
Read case brief
Chancery Division1935

Re Sigsworth

[1935] Chancery 89

Golden Rule applied to read in words not present in the statute, preventing a murderer from inheriting on intestacy from the person he killed.

golden-rulereading-in-wordsrepugnant-resultinheritancemurderer
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1935

Robinson v Graves

[1935] 1 King's Bench 579

Where the substance of a contract is the exercise of skill and labour, with the supply of materials being merely ancillary, the contract is one for work and labour and not for the sale of goods.

sale-of-goodswork-and-laboursubstance-testsection-4portraitskill
Read case brief
House of Lords (England)1935

Woolmington v. DPP

[1935] AC 462

The golden thread: it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt beyond reasonable doubt; the burden of proof lies on the prosecution throughout and never shifts to the accused except for insanity.

evidence-lawburden-of-proofpresumption-of-innocencegolden-threadcriminal-standardbeyond-reasonable-doubt
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1934

L'Estrange v. Graucob

[1934] 2 King's Bench 394

A person who signs a contractual document is bound by its terms, whether or not they have read or understood them, absent fraud or misrepresentation.

standard-form-contractsignature-ruleexemption-clauses
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1933

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne

[1933] Chancery 935

The corporate veil will be lifted where a company is formed as a mere cloak or sham to evade a contractual obligation such as a non-compete covenant

lifting-the-veilsham-companynon-competefraud-evasion
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1933

Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club

[1933] 1 King's Bench 205

Spectators at inherently risky sporting events are taken to consent to the ordinary, inherent risks of the sport, provided it is conducted in the ordinary and proper manner.

volenti-non-fit-injuriaconsentsporting-eventsdefences
Read case brief
Permanent Court of International Justice1933

Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v Norway)

PCIJ Series A/B No 53 (1933)

A claim to sovereignty requires intention and will to act as sovereign together with actual exercise of authority; in thinly populated or uninhabited territories, modest acts of administration suffice.

PILterritorial-sovereigntyeffective-occupationunilateral-declarationIhlen-Declaration
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1933

Smt. Mussamma Abadi v. Ram Sarup

AIR 1933 Allahabad 613

Intent to defeat creditors is judged from totality of circumstances; actual subjective intent need not be separately proved

property-lawTPAsection-53fraudulent-transferintent
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1932

Bell v. Lever Bros Ltd

[1932] Appeal Cases 161

A common mistake as to a quality of the subject matter of a contract renders the contract void only if the mistake is so fundamental as to make the subject matter essentially different from what the parties believed it to be.

common-mistakefundamental-mistakequality-of-subject-matter
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India1932

CIT v Shaw Wallace and Co

AIR 1932 Privy Council 178

The concept of 'real income': tax is levied on real income actually accrued or received, not on hypothetical or notional income.

taxation-lawreal-incomeaccrualreceived
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1932

Donoghue v. Stevenson

[1932] Appeal Cases 562

A duty of care is owed to persons who are so closely and directly affected by one's act that one ought reasonably to have them in contemplation (the 'neighbour principle').

negligenceduty-of-careneighbour-principlesnail-in-bottletort-law
Read case brief
Bombay High Court1932

Official Assignee, Bombay v. Shroff

AIR 1932 Bombay 281

Property includes every type of interest capable of being owned, including intangible rights such as a seat on the stock exchange

property-lawTPAintangible-propertystock-exchange
Read case brief
Court of Criminal Appeal1932

Rex v Kylsant

[1932] 1 King's Bench 442

A half-truth that creates a false impression is as much an untrue statement as a direct lie; misleading omission in a prospectus amounts to misstatement

prospectusmisstatementhalf-truthmisleading-omissioncriminal-liability
Read case brief
Patna High Court (Division Bench)1932

Syed Shah Muhammad Kazim v Syed Abi Saghir

All India Reporter 1932 Patna 33; 136 Indian Cases 417; judgment of 6 July 1931

A valid waqf requires a substantial dedication of the usufruct to charitable, religious or good purposes as understood in Muhammadan law. No particular form is necessary; a waqf may be inferred from royal grants in favour of individual persons so long as it was for a perpetual religious, charitable or good purpose; the dedicator need not use the word waqf nor formally transfer to God; and where there is a substantial dedication to a valid object the waqf is not vitiated because some non valid objects are also mentioned. Perpetuity is a necessary condition but need not be expressly stated, and where the named purpose is liable to failure the waqf remains valid and the property goes to the poor.

muslim-lawwaqfessentials-of-waqfperpetuityno-particular-formkhankahsajjadanashinsection-92-cpc
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1931

Calico Printers Association Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd

(1931) 145 Law Times 51

There is no privity of contract between a principal and a sub-agent. A sub-agent is answerable to the agent who employed him, and the principal's remedy for the sub-agent's default lies against his own agent.

agencysub-agentsection-192privitydelegationbanking
Read case brief
Lahore High Court1929

Dass Ratna v. Kunj Bihari

AIR 1929 Lahore 587

Alteration of date on a cheque is material alteration under S.87; renders instrument void without consent

material-alterationS87date-alterationchequevoid
Read case brief
German-Polish Mixed Arbitral Tribunal1929

Deutsche Continental Gas-Gesellschaft v. Polish State

(1929) 5 Annual Digest 11

A state exists in international law when it possesses: (1) a defined territory, (2) a permanent population, (3) an effective government, and (4) capacity to enter into relations with other states. These four criteria constitute the declaratory test of statehood.

statehoodfour-criteriadeclaratory-theoryterritorypopulationgovernmentcapacity
Read case brief
Permanent Court of International Justice1928

Chorzow Factory Case (Germany v. Poland)

PCIJ Series A, No. 17 (1928)

(1) Reparation must wipe out all consequences of the illegal act and restore the status quo ante. (2) The essential principle is that reparation must, as far as possible, put the injured party in the position it would have been in had the wrongful act not occurred.

state-responsibilityreparationrestitutiondamagesstatus-quo-ante
Read case brief
Privy Council1928

Sadiq Ali Khan v. Jai Kishori

AIR 1928 Privy Council 152

Silence without knowledge of one's rights does not constitute implied election; awareness of competing claims is essential

property-lawTPAsection-35electionknowledgeimplied
Read case brief
Privy Council (on appeal from New Zealand)1927

Bisset v. Wilkinson

[1927] Appeal Cases 177

A statement of opinion or belief, as distinct from a statement of fact, does not amount to actionable misrepresentation, even if it turns out to be incorrect, provided it was honestly made.

misrepresentationopinion-vs-facthonest-beliefnon-actionablerescission
Read case brief
Permanent Court of International Justice1927

The SS Lotus Case (France v Turkey)

PCIJ Series A No 10 (1927)

In international law, whatever is not expressly prohibited is permitted; states retain sovereign freedom of action unless a specific rule of international law restricts it.

PILsovereigntyjurisdictionlotus-principlepermissive-rule
Read case brief
US-Mexico General Claims Commission1926

Neer Claim (USA v. Mexico)

4 RIAA 60 (1926)

Established the "international minimum standard" for treatment of aliens. A state is responsible for injury to an alien only if the treatment amounts to an "outrage, bad faith, wilful neglect of duty, or insufficiency of governmental action so far short of international standards.

state-responsibilitytreatment-of-aliensinternational-minimum-standarddenial-of-justice
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1925

Baldry v Marshall

[1925] 1 King's Bench 260

Fitness for a purpose made known by the buyer is a condition, not a warranty. A clause excluding liability for warranties does not exclude liability for breach of condition, exclusion clauses being construed strictly.

sale-of-goodsconditionswarrantiessection-12exclusion-clausestrict-construction
Read case brief
House of Lords1925

Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd

[1925] Appeal Cases 619

A shareholder, even a sole shareholder, has no insurable interest in the company's property because company property belongs to the company, not to shareholders

separate-entityinsurable-interestcompany-propertyshareholder-rights
Read case brief
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (on appeal from Allahabad)1925

Mt Maina Bibi v Chaudhri Vakil Ahmad

(1925) 52 Indian Appeals 145; All India Reporter 1925 Privy Council 63; judgment of 11 December 1924

A widow who is not a secured creditor but is in possession of her husband's estate with the consent of the heirs is entitled to retain possession until her dower debt is satisfied. The Board expressly declined to decide whether that right is a lien in the strict sense; whatever it is called, it rests on the power of a widow, as a creditor for dower, to hold property of her husband of which she has lawfully and without force or fraud obtained possession, until her debt is satisfied. It confers no title and places her on no higher footing than any other creditor.

muslim-lawdowermahrwidows-right-of-retentionlienno-titleprivy-council
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1925

Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Co

[1925] Chancery 407

Directors are required to show a degree of skill reasonably expected from persons of their knowledge and experience; they are entitled to trust officers and delegate unless grounds for suspicion exist.

directorsduty-of-carestandard-of-skilldelegationtrust-in-officers
Read case brief
Court of Session (Scotland)1924

Baird v Lees

1924 SC 83

A company may be wound up on the just and equitable ground where its substratum (fundamental object) has failed or become impossible of attainment.

winding-upjust-and-equitablesubstratumfailure-of-object
Read case brief
House of Lords1924

Duff Development Co v Government of Kelantan

[1924] Appeal Cases 797

A certificate from the Crown as to the status of a foreign sovereign is conclusive evidence binding on English courts; courts cannot go behind the executive's position on recognition.

PILrecognitionsovereign-immunityexecutive-certificate
Read case brief
House of Lords1924

Jubilee Cotton Mills v Lewis

[1924] Appeal Cases 958

The Certificate of Incorporation is conclusive evidence that all requirements of the Act have been complied with; cannot be challenged on procedural grounds after issue

incorporationcertificateconclusive-evidenceirrebuttableregistration
Read case brief
Court of Appeal, England1924

R v Electricity Commissioners

[1924] 1 King's Bench 171

Certiorari lies against any body with a legal duty to act judicially in a matter affecting rights of subjects; not limited to formal courts.

administrative-lawcertiorariquasi-judicialsem-3
Read case brief
King's Bench Division, England1924

R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy

[1924] 1 King's Bench 256

Justice must not only be done but must manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done; the reasonable apprehension of bias by an informed observer disqualifies the decision-maker.

administrative-lawrule-against-biasnatural-justicesem-3
Read case brief
Privy Council1924

Raghunath Prasad v. Sarju Prasad

(1924) Allahabad India Reporter, Privy Council 60; (1923) 51 Indian Appeals 101

To establish undue influence under Section 16 ICA, three steps must be proved: (1) the parties are in a relationship where one can dominate the other's will; (2) the dominant party used that position to obtain an unfair advantage; (3) the transaction is unconscionable on its face.

undue-influenceSection-16domination-of-willunconscionableburden-of-proofPrivy-Council
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1924

The Koursk

[1924] P 140

Joint tortfeasors are those acting pursuant to a common design or shared duty; several tortfeasors act entirely independently, though both categories may face similar practical consequences regarding recovery.

joint-tortfeasorsseveral-tortfeasorscontribution
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1923

Folkes v King

[1923] 1 King's Bench 282

A sale by a mercantile agent binds the owner where the agent was in possession with the owner's consent and sold in the ordinary course of business to a good faith buyer. The agent's fraudulent intention in obtaining possession, and his breach of a price limitation, do not defeat the buyer.

sale-of-goodsmercantile-agentsection-27nemo-datconsent-to-possessiongood-faith
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1923

Hardy and Co v Hillerns and Fowler

[1923] 2 King's Bench 490

A buyer who resells and despatches goods to sub-buyers does an act inconsistent with the ownership of the seller. That constitutes acceptance, and the right to reject for breach of condition is lost even if a reasonable opportunity of examination has not been exhausted. The buyer is confined to damages.

sale-of-goodssection-41section-42acceptanceright-to-rejectinconsistent-actexamination
Read case brief
Madras High Court1923

Narayana Swami v Pandiyan

AIR 1923 Madras 607

Hindu reversioner's interest is a present vested right, not spes successionis; transferable

property-lawspes-successionisreversionersection-6avested-right
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1923

Rowland v Divall

[1923] 2 King's Bench 500

Breach of the implied condition as to the seller's right to sell produces a total failure of consideration. The buyer may recover the entire price with no deduction for the period during which he used the goods, because he never obtained ownership.

sale-of-goodsright-to-sellsection-14total-failure-of-considerationrecovery-of-price
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1922

Underwood Ltd v Burgh Castle Brick and Cement Syndicate

[1922] 1 King's Bench 343

Where the seller is bound to do something to put the goods into a deliverable state, property does not pass until that thing is done and the buyer has notice of it. Goods requiring detachment and loading are not in a deliverable state.

sale-of-goodspassing-of-propertysection-21deliverable-staterisksection-26
Read case brief
King's Bench Division1921

Cape Brandy Syndicate v. IRC

[1921] 1 King's Bench 64

Courts must interpret statutes according to the intent of Parliament as expressed in the words used. If the words are clear, no external purpose can override them.

literal-ruleintent-of-parliamentplain-meaningtaxation
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1921

Joachimson v. Swiss Bank Corporation

[1921] 3 King's Bench 110

Bank's obligation to repay deposits arises only upon demand by the customer at the branch where the account is maintained

banker-customerdemandlimitationrepaymentbranch
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1921

Luther v. Sagor

[1921] 3 King's Bench 532

Once a government is recognised by the executive (Crown), the courts must accept its acts as valid sovereign acts. Recognition is conclusive and courts cannot go behind it. Acts of an unrecognised government have no legal effect in domestic courts.

recognitionsovereign-actsexecutive-certificateunrecognised-governmentact-of-state
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1921

Niblett Ltd v Confectioners' Materials Co Ltd

[1921] 3 King's Bench 387

A seller does not have a right to sell within the meaning of Section 14(a) where he cannot sell without exposing the buyer to restraint by a third party, such as an injunction for infringement of a trade mark.

sale-of-goodsright-to-sellsection-14merchantable-qualitytrade-markthird-party-rights
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1921

Re Polemis and Furness, Withy and Co. Ltd.

[1921] 3 King's Bench 560

A defendant is liable for all damage that is a direct consequence of their negligent act, regardless of whether that specific damage was foreseeable.

negligenceremoteness-of-damagedirect-consequence-test
Read case brief
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (on appeal from Calcutta)1921

Syed Habibur Rahman Chowdhury v Syed Altaf Ali Chowdhury

(1921) Law Reports 48 Indian Appeals 114; (1921) 23 Bombay Law Reporter 636; Indian Law Reports 48 Calcutta 856; judgment of 9 March 1921

Legitimacy is a status which results from certain facts; legitimation is a proceeding which creates a status that did not exist before. In the proper sense there is no legitimation under Muhammadan law. An acknowledgment is a declaration of legitimacy and not a legitimation. It has more than evidential value in that it raises a presumption of marriage and shifts the onus onto those denying the marriage, but the presumption is one of fact and not juris et de jure, and it is rebutted by affirmative proof that no marriage existed.

muslim-lawacknowledgmentlegitimacylegitimationpresumption-of-marriageprivy-councildunedinonus
Read case brief
King's Bench Division (England)1920

Behrend and Co Ltd v Produce Brokers Co Ltd

[1920] 3 King's Bench 530

Unless otherwise agreed, the buyer is not bound to accept delivery by instalments. Where only part is delivered and the balance follows after a substantial interval, the buyer may keep and pay for the part delivered and reject the remainder, recovering the price paid for it.

sale-of-goodssection-37section-38deliveryinstalmentsshort-deliverypart-acceptance
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1919

Balfour v. Balfour

[1919] 2 King's Bench 571

Domestic agreements between spouses are presumed not to create legally enforceable contracts; the onus is on the party alleging a contract to rebut this presumption.

intention-to-create-legal-relationsdomestic-agreementpresumptioncontract-formation
Read case brief
King's Bench Division1919

Phillips v Brooks Ltd

[1919] 2 King's Bench 243

A seller dealing face to face intends to contract with the person physically present, so a false claim of identity renders the contract voidable for fraud and not void. Title passes to the rogue, and a good faith transferee who takes before rescission acquires good title.

sale-of-goodsnemo-datsection-29voidable-titleface-to-facebona-fide-purchaser
Read case brief
King's Bench Division1919

Pignataro v Gilroy

[1919] 1 King's Bench 459

Appropriation of unascertained goods to the contract with the other party's assent passes property, and assent may be implied from silence and failure to object. Risk then follows property, so the buyer bears a subsequent loss.

sale-of-goodspassing-of-propertysection-23appropriationimplied-assentrisk
Read case brief
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (on appeal from Calcutta)1918

Imambandi v Sheikh Haji Mutsaddi

(1918) Law Reports 45 Indian Appeals 73; Indian Law Reports 45 Calcutta 878; All India Reporter 1918 Privy Council 11; judgment of 28 February 1918

Under Muhammadan law the mother is entitled only to custody of the person of a minor; she is not the natural guardian and has no greater power over the minor's property than a stranger. The label de facto guardian is misleading. A person having charge of the person or property of a minor without being the legal guardian has no power to convey to another any right or interest in immovable property which the transferee can enforce against the infant, nor can such transferee, if let into possession, resist an action in ejectment on behalf of the infant as a trespasser.

muslim-lawguardianshipde-facto-guardianalienationminors-propertyimmovable-propertyprivy-councilameer-ali
Read case brief
House of Lords (England)1918

London Joint Stock Bank v. Macmillan & Arthur

[1918] Appeal Cases 777

Customer owes implied duty to draw cheques with reasonable care (Macmillan duty); negligent drawing shifts loss to customer

paying-bankercustomer-dutynegligencematerial-alterationMacmillan-dutycheque-drawing
Read case brief
Madras High Court1918

Maanicka Naicker v. Macnicol

AIR 1918 Madras 456

A stipulation for collateral advantage continuing after redemption of mortgage is a clog on equity of redemption and is void

property-lawTPAsection-60clogcollateral-advantage
Read case brief
Madras High Court1917

Chikham Amiraju v. Chikham Seshamma

(1917) Indian Law Reports 41 Madras 33

A threat to commit suicide amounts to coercion under Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act, as suicide (attempt) is an act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code; consent obtained through such threat is not free.

coercionSection-15suicide-threatIPCfree-consentvoidable
Read case brief
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (on appeal from Allahabad)1916

Hamira Bibi v Zubaida Bibi

(1916) 43 Indian Appeals 294; All India Reporter 1916 Privy Council 46; Indian Law Reports 38 Allahabad 581; judgment of 1 August 1916

Dower is a debt of the husband and the widow is entitled, along with other creditors, to have it satisfied out of his estate on his death, but her right is no greater than that of any other unsecured creditor. As against the heirs she has a creditor's lien, so that where she has lawfully obtained possession of the estate with the express or implied consent of the husband or the heirs she may retain that possession until the dower debt is satisfied.

muslim-lawdowermahrwidows-right-of-retentionunsecured-debtprivy-council
Read case brief
Privy Council1916

Musahar Sahu v Hakim Lal

AIR 1916 Privy Council 28

Transfer to close relative without consideration + retention of possession + timing near debt = presumed fraudulent under S.53

property-lawfraudulent-transfersection-53badges-of-fraud
Read case brief
Privy Council1915

Bal Gangadhar Tilak v. Shrinivas Pandit

AIR 1915 Privy Council 7

Condition precedent requires only substantial compliance, not literal compliance; the essence of the condition must be fulfilled

property-lawTPAsection-25condition-precedentsubstantial-compliancelandmark
Read case brief
House of Lords (England)1915

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v. Selfridge & Co Ltd

[1915] Appeal Cases 847

Only a party to a contract can sue upon it (privity); a person who has provided no consideration to the defendant cannot enforce the defendant's promise, even if the promise was made for their benefit.

privity-of-contractconsiderationthird-partymanufacturerresale-priceEnglish-law
Read case brief
Chancery Division1915

Hutton v Car Maintenance Co Ltd

[1915] 1 Chancery 621

A particular lien requires the exercise of labour or skill which improves the goods. A bailee who merely maintains or preserves goods in the condition in which he received them acquires no lien for his charges.

bailmentlienparticular-liensection-170improvementmaintenance
Read case brief
Bombay High Court1914

Achaldas Durgaji v. Purshottam Premji

AIR 1914 Bombay 135

Where no interest in property is transferred but property is expressly made security for a debt, the transaction creates a charge, not a mortgage

property-lawTPAsection-100chargemortgagedistinction
Read case brief
King's Bench Division (England)1914

Ladbroke & Co v. Todd

(1914) 30 TLR 433

A single transaction suffices to make a person a 'customer'; bank negligent in opening account without references loses S.131 protection

customer-definitionaccount-openingnegligenceS131single-transaction
Read case brief
Calcutta High Court1913

Devi Prasad v. Gopal Chandra

AIR 1913 Calcutta 259

A person who accepts a benefit under an instrument is deemed to have elected in favor of all provisions of that instrument, including those disposing of their own property

property-lawTPAsection-35electionacceptance
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1913

Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt

(1913) 11 ALJ 489; 1913 Supreme Court Cases OnLine Allahabad 242

An offer must be communicated to the offeree before it can be accepted; performance of the act without knowledge of the offer does not constitute acceptance and gives no right to the reward.

communication-of-offerknowledge-of-offeracceptancerewardSection-2aIndian-Contract-Act
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1913

Wimble, Sons and Co Ltd v Rosenberg and Sons

[1913] 3 King's Bench 743

The seller's duty to give the buyer notice enabling him to insure goods sent by a route involving sea transit is purposive. Where the buyer already possesses the information necessary to effect insurance, the absence of a formal notice does not put the goods at the seller's risk.

sale-of-goodssection-39sea-transitnotice-to-insureriskfob
Read case brief
House of Lords1912

Lloyd v Grace, Smith and Co

[1912] Appeal Cases 716

A principal is liable for the fraud of an agent committed within the apparent scope of his authority, even where the fraud was for the agent's own benefit and the principal neither knew of nor benefited from it.

agencyfraud-of-agentsection-238apparent-authorityvicarious-liability
Read case brief
Bombay High Court1912

Mulraj Khatau v. Vishwanath

AIR 1912 Bombay 362

An unsecured book debt not secured by mortgage or pledge is an actionable claim transferable by written assignment under S.130

property-lawTPAsection-130actionable-claimunsecured-debt
Read case brief
House of Lords1911

Wallis, Son and Wells v Pratt and Haynes

[1911] Appeal Cases 394

Correspondence with description is a condition and not a warranty. A contractual clause excluding warranties does not protect a seller against breach of the condition as to description.

sale-of-goodssale-by-descriptionsection-15conditionswarrantiesexclusion-clause
Read case brief
Privy Council1910

Khwaja Muhammad Khan v. Husaini Begum

(1910) 37 Indian Appeals 152

Where a contract, though made between other parties, creates a specific charge or trust in favour of a third party who is a natural object of the promisor's bounty, that third party may enforce the provision, an exception to the privity rule.

privity-of-contractexceptionstrust-exceptionfamily-arrangement
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1908

Nash v. Inman

[1908] 2 King's Bench 1

A minor is only liable for 'necessaries' under the Sale of Goods Act; necessaries must be (1) suitable to the condition in life of the minor AND (2) at his actual requirements at the time of sale, if the minor is already adequately supplied, the goods are not necessaries.

minornecessariescapacitySection-68-ICAadequate-supplycondition-in-life
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1907

Faiyaz Hussain Khan v. Prag Narain

AIR 1907 Allahabad 145

S.52 applies only when the right to specific immovable property is directly and specifically in question, not merely incidentally involved

property-lawTPAsection-52lis-pendensdirectly-in-question
Read case brief
Privy Council1907

Perry v Clissold

[1907] Appeal Cases 73

Possession by itself is good title against all the world except a person having better title: a possessor can sue a trespasser even without proving ownership

possessiontitletrespasserpresumption-of-ownershippossessory-rights
Read case brief
Bombay High Court1906

Bai Jiva v. Khimji Cooverji

AIR 1906 Bombay 89

A gift once accepted cannot be revoked unilaterally by the donor; revocation only under S.126 conditions

property-lawTPAsection-126giftrevocationirrevocable
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1906

Dhanpat v Sohan Lal

Indian Law Reports (1906) 28 Allahabad 568

One who accepts benefit under a transaction must confirm the whole; approbation and reprobation impermissible (doctrine of election)

property-lawelectionsection-35approbate-reprobate
Read case brief
King's Bench Division1905

West Rand Central Gold Mining Co v R

[1905] 2 King's Bench 391

International law forms part of English law only insofar as it has been recognised and adopted by English courts; unincorporated international obligations do not automatically bind the Crown.

PILincorporationtransformationadoptiondomestic-application
Read case brief
Chancery Division (England)1904

Carmichael v Evans

[1904] 1 Chancery 486

Where the partnership deed confers a power of expulsion for conduct detrimental to the business, a conviction for dishonesty is such conduct and expulsion is valid. The power must be exercised in good faith and strictly within the terms conferred.

partnershipsection-33expulsiongood-faithscandalous-conductreconstitution
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1903

Krell v. Henry

[1903] 2 King's Bench 740

A contract is frustrated where the fundamental purpose for which both parties entered the contract ceases to exist due to a supervening event, even though literal performance remains physically possible: the doctrine of frustration of purpose.

frustrationfrustration-of-purposecoronation-casesfoundation-of-contractsupervening-eventdischarge
Read case brief
Privy Council (Judicial Committee)1903

Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose

(1903) 30 Indian Appeals 114; [1903] UKPC 12

A contract entered into by a minor is void ab initio under Indian law, not merely voidable; a minor has no capacity to contract under Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

minorcapacityvoid-ab-initioSection-11mortgageIndian-Contract-Act
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1903

Priest v Last

[1903] 2 King's Bench 148

Where goods have one obvious use, the buyer makes known the particular purpose merely by asking for the article by name, and the implied condition of fitness for purpose applies.

sale-of-goodsfitness-for-purposesection-16implied-conditionhot-water-bottle
Read case brief
Chancery Division1901

Borland's Trustee v Steel Brothers & Co Ltd

[1901] 1 Chancery 279

A share is not a sum of money but an interest measured by a sum of money: a bundle of rights including the right to dividend, vote, and surplus assets on winding up

sharesnature-of-sharebundle-of-rightsmembershipchose-in-action
Read case brief
House of Lords1901

Keighley, Maxsted and Co v Durant

[1901] Appeal Cases 240

Ratification is possible only where the person doing the act professed at the time to act on behalf of the principal. An undisclosed intention to act for another cannot be converted into agency by subsequent ratification.

agencyratificationsection-196undisclosed-intentionprofessed-agency
Read case brief
Chancery Division1900

Dixon v Kennaway & Co

[1900] 1 Chancery 833

A company is estopped from making calls on shares that have been certified as fully paid; the share certificate operates as a representation upon which holders are entitled to rely

share-certificateestoppelcallsfully-paid-shares
Read case brief
House of Lords1900

Gluckstein v Barnes

[1900] Appeal Cases 240

Promoters must disclose ALL profits connected with the company's formation; partial disclosure is insufficient; duty extends to every profit, not just the final sale

promoterfiduciary-dutysecret-profitfull-disclosurepartial-disclosure
Read case brief
Calcutta High Court1900

Rajlukhy Dabee v. Bhootnath Mookerjee

(1900) 4 CWN 488

For an agreement without consideration to be valid under Section 25(1) ICA, there must be genuine natural love and affection between parties standing in near relation; a promise made merely to get rid of a wife does not qualify.

considerationexceptionSection-25natural-love-and-affectionnear-relationvoid-agreement
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1899

Balkishen Das v. Legge

(1899) 22 Allahabad 149

Courts look behind the form to the substance; a conditional sale intended as security for a debt is a mortgage, not a sale

property-lawTPAsection-58conditional-salesubstance-over-formlandmark
Read case brief
Privy Council1899

Bhagwan Singh v. Bhagwan Singh

(1899) Indian Law Reports 21 Allahabad 275

Custom must be proved by clear evidence of long continuous practice; the burden of proof lies on the party asserting the custom

customburden-of-proofevidencerequisites-of-custom
Read case brief
House of Lords1899

Powell v. Kempton Park

[1899] Appeal Cases 143

Ejusdem generis applied. "Other place" restricted to indoor locations when preceded by "house, office, room" (all indoor spaces). An outdoor enclosure was not ejusdem generis.

ejusdem-generisliteral-ruleplaceoutdoorbetting
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division1898

Kruse v. Johnson

[1898] 2 Queen's Bench 91

Bye-laws and subordinate legislation are presumed valid and will not be struck down unless they are manifestly unreasonable, partial or unequal in operation, repugnant to the general law, or ultra vires the parent statute.

subordinate-legislationbye-lawsreasonablenessultra-viresvalidity-test
Read case brief
House of Lords1897

Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd

[1897] Appeal Cases 22

Upon valid incorporation, a company is a separate legal person distinct from its members, even if one person holds virtually all shares

separate-legal-entitycorporate-personalityone-man-companylimited-liabilityfoundational
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division (England)1897

Wilkinson v. Downton

[1897] 2 Queen's Bench 57

Deliberate conduct calculated to cause, and which does cause, psychiatric or physical harm through nervous shock is actionable, independent of physical contact.

nervous-shockintentional-inflictionpsychiatric-injury
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1896

Re Kingston Cotton Mill Co (No 2)

[1896] 2 Chancery 279

An auditor is a watchdog, not a bloodhound; he is not bound to approach his work with suspicion or to be a detective unless the circumstances are such as to arouse suspicion.

auditorwatchdogbloodhoundduty-of-caresuspicionstandard-of-skill
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1895

Bradford Corporation v. Pickles

[1895] Appeal Cases 587

Where an act is otherwise lawful, the actor's malicious motive for performing it does not convert the act into an actionable tort.

malicemotivelawful-actgeneral-principles
Read case brief
House of Lords1895

Helby v Matthews

[1895] Appeal Cases 471

Where a person in possession under a hire agreement has a genuine option to return the goods and end future liability, he has not agreed to buy them. He is a bailee with no title and can pass none to a transferee.

hire-purchasesale-of-goodsoption-to-purchasenemo-datsection-30agreed-to-buy
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1895

Re London and General Bank (No 2)

[1895] 2 Chancery 673

An auditor's duty is to report to shareholders, not merely to directors; the auditor must form an independent opinion and report any matter that shareholders ought to know.

auditorduty-to-reportshareholdersindependent-opinionaccounts
Read case brief
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (on appeal from Calcutta)1894

Abul Fata Mahomed Ishak v Russomoy Dhur Chowdhry

(1894) Law Reports 22 Indian Appeals 76; Indian Law Reports 22 Calcutta 619

A settlement whose substance and dominating purpose is provision for the settlor's family and descendants, with the charitable object dependent on the failure of the line and therefore illusory or so remote as to be nominal, is a family settlement dressed as a waqf and is void. The charitable gift must be substantial and not illusory.

muslim-lawwaqfwaqf-alal-auladfamily-waqfillusory-charityprivy-councilmussalman-wakf-validating-act-1913legislative-reversal
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division1894

In re Meunier

[1894] 2 Queen's Bench 415

Indiscriminate anarchist violence directed against society as a whole does not qualify as a political offence; the exception requires two contending parties struggling for political power.

PILextraditionpolitical-offence-exceptionanarchismterrorism
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division1894

Ultzen v Nicols

[1894] 1 Queen's Bench 92

A bailment may arise by conduct without any request from the owner. Where a person voluntarily assumes possession and control of another's goods, he becomes a bailee and owes the duty of care of a bailee.

bailmentgratuitous-bailmentsection-148section-151implied-bailment
Read case brief
House of Lords1893

Balkis Consolidated Co Ltd v Tomkinson

[1893] Appeal Cases 396

A company that issues a share certificate is estopped from denying the truth of statements therein against persons who acted on the faith of the certificate

share-certificateestoppelprima-facie-evidencebona-fide-purchaser
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1893

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company

[1893] 1 Queen's Bench 256

An advertisement can constitute a binding unilateral offer to the world at large, accepted by performance of its stated conditions; consideration exists in the inconvenience of performance.

unilateral-contractoffer-to-worldacceptance-by-performanceconsiderationadvertisementcontract-formation
Read case brief
Privy Council (on appeal from Jamaica)1893

Harvey v. Facey

[1893] Appeal Cases 552

A mere statement of the lowest price at which a party would sell does not constitute an offer; it is merely a supply of information in response to an inquiry.

offerinvitation-to-treatsupply-of-informationprice-quotationdistinctioncontract-formation
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1893

Lee v Butler

[1893] 2 Queen's Bench 318

Where a person in possession under an agreement is bound to pay the whole price by instalments and has no right to return the goods, the agreement is in substance an agreement to buy, and he may pass a good title to a bona fide purchaser.

hire-purchasesale-of-goodsagreed-to-buysection-30nemo-datinstalment-sale
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division1893

Watteau v Fenwick

[1893] 1 Queen's Bench 346

Where a person is placed in a position which ordinarily carries authority to do acts of a particular kind, the principal is bound by such acts even if he has privately restricted the authority, as against a third party who did not know of the restriction.

agencyusual-authorityapparent-authoritysection-237section-20undisclosed-principal
Read case brief
House of Lords1892

Ooregum Gold Mining Co of India v Roper

[1892] Appeal Cases 125

Shares cannot be issued at a discount to their nominal (par) value; the capital represented by shares must be maintained intact for the protection of creditors

share-capitaldiscount-sharescapital-maintenancepar-value
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1891

Aas v Benham

[1891] 2 Chancery 244

A partner must account only for profits derived from a transaction within the scope of the firm's business, or from the use of the firm's property, name or business connection in that business. Information acquired as a partner may be used freely in a wholly different line of business.

partnershipsection-16duty-to-accountsecret-profitscope-of-businessfiduciary-duty
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division1891

In re Castioni

[1891] 1 Queen's Bench 149

A "political offence" for purposes of extradition exemption requires that the act was incidental to and formed part of a political disturbance. Not every crime with a political motive qualifies; there must be a direct nexus between the crime and a genuine political uprising.

extraditionpolitical-offence-exceptionpolitical-disturbancenexus-test
Read case brief
Calcutta High Court1891

Rani Hemanta Kumari v Gauri Shankar

Indian Law Reports (1891) 18 Calcutta 83

No one can transfer better title than they possess (nemo dat quod non habet); transfer without title conveys nothing

property-lawnemo-datsection-7competency
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1891

Smith v. Baker

[1891] Appeal Cases 325

Mere continued work with knowledge of a risk, absent genuine free choice to accept it given economic necessity, does not establish volenti non fit injuria. Scienti (knowledge) is not volenti (consent).

volenti-non-fit-injuriascienti-non-fit-injuriaemploymentdefences
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division (England)1891

Stanley v. Powell

[1891] 1 Queen's Bench 86

Where harm results despite the defendant's exercise of full reasonable care, through a genuinely unforeseeable and unavoidable occurrence, this constitutes an inevitable accident excusing liability.

inevitable-accidentdefencesreasonable-carenegligence
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1890

Henderson v Bank of Australasia

(1890) 45 Chancery D 330

A defective notice of a general meeting vitiates any resolution passed thereat; procedural compliance with notice requirements is essential for the validity of corporate acts.

meetingsnoticeresolutionprocedural-compliancevalidity
Read case brief
House of Lords1889

Derry v Peek

(1889) 14 Appeal Cases 337

Fraud requires knowledge of falsehood or recklessness; honest belief in truth, even if unreasonable, negates fraud.

fraudmisrepresentationhonest-beliefmens-reaprospectus
Read case brief
Madras High Court1889

Ranganayakamma v. Alwar Setti

(1889) Indian Law Reports 13 Madras 214

Threatening to withhold a dead body from cremation unless a person consents to an adoption amounts to coercion under Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act; the resulting consent is not free and the agreement is voidable.

coercionSection-15free-consentdead-bodyadoptionvoidableIPCunlawful-detention
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1888

Colquhoun v. Brooks

(1888) 21 Queen's Bench Division 52

The ejusdem generis rule requires that the specific words forming the genus must constitute a distinct category or class. If the specific words do not share a common genus, the general words following them receive their full natural meaning without restriction.

ejusdem-generisgenusspecific-wordsgeneral-wordsno-common-category
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court (Full Bench)1888

Muhammad Allahdad Khan v Muhammad Ismail Khan

(1888) Indian Law Reports 10 Allahabad 289 (Full Bench); judgment of 7 April 1888

Acknowledgment of parentage (ikrar) under Muhammadan law is a rule of substantive personal status and not merely a rule of evidence, so it falls within the personal law the courts must administer and is not displaced by the Evidence Act 1872. Where the fact or date of the marriage is neither proved nor disproved, a father's acknowledgment of a son establishes marriage and legitimacy for purposes of inheritance, provided legitimacy is possible. Acknowledgment cannot legitimise a child proved to be illegitimate.

muslim-lawacknowledgmentikrarpaternitylegitimacymahmood-jsubstantive-statusevidence-act
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1887

Allcard v. Skinner

(1887) 36 Chancery D 145

A transaction procured through undue influence arising from a relationship of trust and confidence may nonetheless stand if the party seeking to set it aside delayed unreasonably in doing so after the influence ceased.

undue-influencedelaylachesrelationship-of-confidence
Read case brief
Queen's Bench Division1887

Tuck & Sons v. Priester

(1887) 19 Queen's Bench Division 629

Noscitur a sociis applied. The meaning of a doubtful word is determined by reference to the words associated with it in the statute.

noscitur-a-sociisassociated-wordscontextmeaning-from-companions
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court (Full Bench)1886

Abdul Kadir v Salima

(1886) Indian Law Reports 8 Allahabad 149 (Full Bench); judgment of 21 January 1886

Marriage among Muhammadans is a purely civil contract and not a sacrament, and the rights and obligations it creates arise immediately on the contract being made. Non-payment of prompt dower does not bar the husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights, but because restitution is an equitable relief akin to specific performance the decree is made conditional on payment of prompt dower, and the wife may lawfully refuse cohabitation until prompt dower is paid.

muslim-lawmarriagecivil-contractdowermahrrestitution-of-conjugal-rightsmahmood-j
Read case brief
Calcutta High Court1886

Kedar Nath Bhattacharji v. Gorie Mahomed

(1886) Indian Law Reports 14 Calcutta 64

A promise to subscribe to a charitable or public fund becomes enforceable when the promisee, acting on the promise, incurs liability or changes position; the promisee's act constitutes consideration for the subscription.

considerationsubscriptioncharitable-promisepromissory-liabilitySection-2dIndian-law
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court (Full Bench)1885

Jafri Begam v Amir Muhammad Khan

(1885) Indian Law Reports 7 Allahabad 822 (Full Bench); judgment of 10 February 1885

On the death of a Muslim owner the inheritance vests immediately in the heirs in their specific shares; devolution is not suspended pending payment of debts. Muhammadan heirs are independent owners of their specific shares, and if they take subject to the charge of the debts of the deceased their liability is in proportion to the extent of their shares. A creditor must therefore implead all the heirs against whose shares he seeks to enforce his claim. No valid will can be made in favour of an heir, and even in favour of a stranger a bequest holds good only to the extent of one third of the property remaining after funeral expenses and debts; consent of the heirs validating an excess must be given after the testator's death.

muslim-lawsuccessionheirs-liabilityproportionate-liabilitybequeathable-thirdbequest-to-heirconsent-of-heirsmahmood-j
Read case brief
House of Lords (England)1884

Foakes v. Beer

[1884] UKHL 1; (1884) 9 Appeal Cases 605

Part payment of a debt is not good consideration for a promise to forgo the balance; the rule in Pinnel's Case is affirmed by the House of Lords.

considerationpart-paymentdebtPinnels-Casepre-existing-dutyEnglish-law
Read case brief
Madras High Court1882

Chinnaya v. Ramayya

Indian Law Reports (1882) 4 Madras 137

Under Indian law (Section 2(d) ICA), consideration may proceed from the promisee or 'any other person'; a stranger to consideration (but not to the contract) can enforce the agreement.

considerationstranger-to-considerationSection-2dprivitythird-partyIndian-Contract-Act
Read case brief
House of Lords1880

Attorney General v Great Eastern Railway Co

(1880) 5 Appeal Cases 473

A company has implied power to do everything fairly incidental to or consequential upon its expressly stated objects; the doctrine of ultra vires should not be applied unreasonably to destroy the useful transactions of a company.

ultra-viresincidental-powersancillary-powersobjects-clauseimplied-powers
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1880

Durga Prasad v. Baldeo

(1880) Indian Law Reports 3 Allahabad 221

A promise made in consideration of an act done at the promisor's own desire, but not at the request of the promisee, does not constitute valid consideration.

considerationdesire-of-promisorpast-consideration
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1879

Sturges v. Bridgman

(1879) 11 Chancery D 852

The reasonableness of an activity is assessed relative to its current effect on the specific neighbouring use; prior uncomplained-of duration does not create a permanent right to continue causing substantial interference.

private-nuisancecoming-to-the-nuisancereasonableness
Read case brief
Privy Council1879

Trimble v. Hill

(1879) 5 Appeal Cases 342

Equity requires the senior creditor with access to multiple funds to first exhaust the fund unavailable to the junior creditor (marshalling)

property-lawTPAmarshallingequityjunior-creditor
Read case brief
House of Lords1878

Cundy v Lindsay

(1878) 3 Appeal Cases 459

Where a seller dealing at a distance intends to contract only with the person impersonated, there is no consensus with the rogue and the contract is void. No title passes to the rogue, so an honest purchaser from him acquires nothing.

sale-of-goodsnemo-datsection-27void-contractmistaken-identitybona-fide-purchaser
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1878

De Bussche v Alt

(1878) 8 Chancery Division 286

Where an agent authorised to appoint another to act for the principal does so, that person may stand in a direct fiduciary relationship with the principal and must account to him for any secret profit.

agencysubstituted-agentsection-194secret-profitfiduciary-dutydelegation
Read case brief
House of Lords1878

Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co

(1878) 3 Appeal Cases 1218

A promoter stands in fiduciary relation to the company and must disclose all material facts including personal profit to an independent board

promoterfiduciary-dutysecret-profitdisclosureindependent-board
Read case brief
House of Lords1878

Ward v Hobbs

(1878) 4 Appeal Cases 13

There is no implied warranty of soundness on a sale of goods, and mere non-disclosure of a known defect does not amount to fraud. A sale expressly with all faults places the risk of quality on the buyer.

sale-of-goodscaveat-emptorsection-16non-disclosurewith-all-faultsfraud
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas Division (England)1877

Charles v. Blackwell

(1877) 2 Common Pleas Division 151

Paying banker protected under S.85 when it pays an order cheque bearing what appears to be a genuine endorsement, even if forged

paying-bankerS85forged-endorsementprotectionpayment-in-due-course
Read case brief
Allahabad High Court1877

Fateh Singh v. Sanwal Singh

(1877) Indian Law Reports 1 Allahabad 75

A condition restraining a widow's remarriage attached to a property transfer is void as an absolute restraint on marriage

property-lawTPAsection-29marriage-restraintwidow
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1876

Dickinson v. Dodds

(1876) 2 Chancery D 463

An offer may be revoked at any time before acceptance, even without formal communication, if the offeree learns through reliable means that the offeror has acted inconsistently with the offer.

revocation-of-offercommunication-of-revocationindirect-knowledge
Read case brief
Court of Appeal1876

Howell v Coupland

(1876) 1 Queen's Bench Division 258

A contract for the sale of goods to be produced from a specified source is subject to an implied condition that the goods come into existence. Failure of the crop without the seller's fault excuses performance to that extent.

sale-of-goodscontingent-goodssection-6future-goodscrop-failureimplied-condition
Read case brief
Court of Appeal (England)1876

Nichols v. Marsland

(1876) 2 Exchequer D 1

An act of God requires a genuinely extraordinary natural event, of a character no reasonable foresight could have anticipated or guarded against.

act-of-godvis-majorstrict-liabilitydefences
Read case brief
Court for Crown Cases Reserved1876

R v Keyn (The Franconia)

(1876) 2 Exchequer D 63

International law does not automatically form part of English domestic law; customary international law requires adoption or incorporation by Parliament or judicial decision before it is enforceable domestically.

PILincorporationtransformationterritorial-seadomestic-application
Read case brief
House of Lords1875

Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co v Riche

(1875) LR 7 House of Lords 653

An act beyond the objects clause of the memorandum is ultra vires the company, void ab initio, and incapable of ratification even by unanimous shareholders

ultra-viresmemorandumobjects-clausevoidratification
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer / House of Lords (England)1875

Currie v. Misa

(1875) LR 10 Exchequer 153; (1876) 1 Appeal Cases 554

Valuable consideration consists either in some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss, or responsibility given, suffered, or undertaken by the other.

considerationdefinitionbenefit-detrimentvaluable-considerationEnglish-law
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer1874

Gorris v. Scott

(1874) LR 9 Exchequer 125

Where a statute is enacted for a specific purpose (preventing spread of disease), breach of that statute does not give a cause of action for a loss (sheep washed overboard) unrelated to the mischief the statute was designed to prevent.

mischief-rulestatutory-purposecausationcontagious-diseasessheep
Read case brief
Exchequer Chamber1874

Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield

(1874) LR 9 Exchequer 132

A person in an existing relationship such as a carrier, who is faced with a genuine emergency and cannot obtain the owner's instructions, may act as an agent of necessity and recover reasonable expenses incurred bona fide in the owner's interest.

agencyagency-of-necessitysection-189carrieremergencyreimbursement
Read case brief
House of Lords1873

Peek v Gurney

(1873) LR 6 House of Lords 377

Only persons who subscribed DIRECTLY on the faith of the prospectus can sue for misstatement; subsequent market purchasers cannot.

prospectusmisstatementreliancesecondary-marketprivity
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer (England)1872

Frost v. Knight

(1872) LR 7 Exchequer 111

Where a party repudiates a contingent contract before the contingency occurs, the innocent party may immediately treat the repudiation as an anticipatory breach and sue for damages without waiting for the contingency to happen.

anticipatory-breachcontingent-contractrepudiationbreach-of-promisemarriageSection-39
Read case brief
Court of Criminal Appeal1872

R v. Allen

(1872) LR 1 CCR 367

Golden Rule applied to narrow "marry" to mean "going through a ceremony of marriage" rather than "contract a valid marriage," avoiding the absurdity of making bigamy impossible to commit.

golden-rulebigamynarrow-constructionabsurd-resultmarry
Read case brief
Privy Council1872

Ramcoomar Koondoo v John McQueen

(1872) LR Supp Vol 209 (Privy Council)

Bona fide purchaser from benami holder acquires good title against real owner who consented to benami

property-lawostensible-ownerbenamisection-41bona-fide-purchaser
Read case brief
Privy Council1872

Tagore v Tagore

(1872) LR Supp Vol 47 (Privy Council)

Rule against perpetuity tests possibility at date of transfer; if interest MIGHT vest beyond permitted period, it is void ab initio

property-lawperpetuitysection-14possibility-testunborn
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1869

Hammersmith Railway Co. v. Brand

(1869) LR 4 House of Lords 171

Statutory authorisation for a general activity does not provide blanket immunity for every aspect of how that activity is conducted, particularly regarding matters within the defendant's genuine discretion.

statutory-authoritydefencesrailwayconditional-authority
Read case brief
Privy Council1868

Collector of Madura v Mootoo Ramalinga Sethupathy

(1868) 12 Moore's Indian Appeals 397

A custom to be valid and legally binding must be ancient, certain, reasonable, and not opposed to public policy or morality; the party asserting a custom bears the burden of proving each of these requirements.

customvalid-customsources-of-hindu-lawburden-of-proofancient-usage
Read case brief
House of Lords1868

Rylands v Fletcher

(1868) LR 3 House of Lords 330

A person who brings on his land something likely to do mischief if it escapes is strictly liable for all damage caused by its escape, regardless of fault.

strict-liabilitynon-natural-useescapeabsolute-liabilityfoundational
Read case brief
Queen's Bench1868

Whiteley v. Chappell

(1868) LR 4 Queen's Bench 147

Literal Rule applied strictly. Impersonating a dead person to vote was not "personating any person entitled to vote" because a dead person is not "entitled to vote.

literal-ruleabsurd-resultvoting-frauddead-personstrict-construction
Read case brief
Privy Council1867

Collector of Masulipatam v. Cavaly Venkata Narrainapah

(1867) 8 Moore's Indian Appeals 529

The doctrine of bona vacantia applies in India. Property of a person who dies intestate without any heirs devolves upon the State as the ultimate owner, not by way of inheritance but by virtue of sovereignty. The State takes as sovereign, not as heir.

bona-vacantiaescheatstate-as-sovereignheirless-propertyultimate-ownership
Read case brief
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council1867

Moonshee Buzloor Ruheem v Shumsoonnissa Begum

(1867) 11 Moore's Indian Appeals 551

A suit for restitution of conjugal rights lies in India under Muslim law, and a decree in such a suit is enforceable against the wife. The Privy Council also observed that Mohammedan law on the question of what constitutes legal cruelty between husband and wife would probably not differ materially from English law, which is the foundation of the rule that the standard of cruelty is religion neutral. Cruelty of such a character as to render it unsafe for the wife to return to her husband's dominion is a valid defence to such a suit.

muslim-lawrestitution-of-conjugal-rightscrueltyprivy-councilreligion-neutral-standardmixed-court-of-equity
Read case brief
Court of Appeal in Chancery1866

Ferguson v Wilson

(1866) LR 2 Chancery App 77

Directors are agents of the company and stand in a fiduciary relationship to it; they must act within their authority and in the company's interest.

directorsagencyfiduciary-relationshipcompany-management
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas (England)1866

Indermaur v Dames

(1866) LR 1 CP 274

An occupier owes a duty to an invitee to use reasonable care to prevent damage from unusual dangers which the occupier knows or ought to know about.

tort-lawoccupiers-liabilityinviteeduty-of-careunusual-danger
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas1866

Kelner v Baxter

(1866) LR 2 Common Pleas 174

A principal must be in existence at the time of the act for ratification to be possible. Promoters who contract on behalf of a company not yet incorporated are personally liable, and the company cannot ratify the contract after incorporation.

agencypre-incorporation-contractratificationsection-230personal-liabilitypromoters
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer (England)1864

Raffles v. Wichelhaus

(1864) 2 H&C 906; 159 English Reports 375

Where a key term of the contract is ambiguous and the parties attach different meanings to it (mutual/bilateral mistake), there is no consensus ad idem and the contract is void.

mutual-mistakeambiguityconsensus-ad-idemPeerlesslatent-ambiguityvoid
Read case brief
Court of Queen's Bench (England)1863

Taylor v. Caldwell

(1863) 3 B&S 826; 122 English Reports 309

Where the performance of a contract depends on the continued existence of a specific thing, destruction of that thing without fault of either party discharges both parties from their obligations (doctrine of frustration).

frustrationimpossibilitydestruction-of-subject-matterdischargeimplied-conditionsupervening-event
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas (England)1862

Felthouse v. Bindley

(1862) 11 CBNS 869; 142 English Reports 1037

Silence or inaction cannot constitute acceptance of an offer; an offeror cannot impose acceptance by stipulating that silence shall amount to consent.

silenceacceptancecommunication-of-acceptanceofferor-cannot-imposecontract-formation
Read case brief
Supreme Court of Calcutta1861

Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co v Secretary of State for India

(1861) 5 Bombay High Court Reports Appendix 1

The East India Company had a dual character. No action lies against the Government for acts done in the exercise of sovereign powers, but the Government is liable for acts done in the conduct of undertakings which might be carried on by private persons without sovereign authority.

constitutional-lawstate-liabilitysovereign-immunityarticle-300vicarious-liabilitysovereign-and-non-sovereigndual-character
Read case brief
Court of Queen's Bench (England)1861

Tweddle v. Atkinson

[1861] 1 B&S 393; 121 English Reports 762

Under English law, consideration must move from the promisee; a person who is a stranger to the consideration cannot sue on the contract even if it was made for their benefit.

privity-of-contractconsideration-must-move-from-promiseestranger-to-considerationEnglish-lawthird-party
Read case brief
House of Lords1860

Cox v Hickman

(1860) 8 House of Lords Cases 268

Sharing of profits is not conclusive evidence of partnership; the true test is whether there is mutual agency between the parties

partnershipprofit-sharingmutual-agencydistinction-from-company
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer (England)1860

Vaughan v. Taff Vale Railway Co.

(1860) 5 H&N 679

Where harm results from the inevitable, inherent consequence of properly conducting a statutorily authorised activity, without additional negligence, the statutory authority provides a complete defence.

statutory-authoritydefencesrailwayabsolute-authority
Read case brief
Court of Appeal in Chancery (England)1857

Bellamy v Sabine

(1857) 1 De G & J 566

Lis pendens operates on principle of public policy and necessity, not on notice

property-lawlis-pendenspublic-policysection-52notice
Read case brief
Exchequer Chamber1857

Collen v Wright

(1857) 8 El and Bl 647; 120 English Reports 241

A person who professes to contract as agent impliedly warrants that he has the authority he claims. Breach of that implied warranty makes him liable in damages to the other party even though he acted honestly and without fraud.

agencybreach-of-warranty-of-authoritysection-235strict-liabilitygood-faith
Read case brief
House of Lords1857

Grey v. Pearson

(1857) 6 House of Lords Cases 61

Origin of the Golden Rule. Lord Wensleydale's formulation: ordinary meaning prevails unless it leads to absurdity, repugnance, or inconsistency, in which case the grammatical meaning may be modified to avoid such result.

golden-ruleoriginlord-wensleydaleabsurdityrepugnancemodification
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer (England)1856

Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co.

(1856) 11 Exchequer 781

Negligence is the omission to do something a reasonable person would do, or doing something a prudent, reasonable person would not do.

negligencereasonable-personstandard-of-care
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer Chamber1856

Royal British Bank v Turquand

(1856) 6 E&B 327; 119 English Reports 886

Persons dealing with a company are entitled to presume that its internal regulations have been duly observed (Doctrine of Indoor Management)

indoor-managementconstructive-noticeturquand-rulethird-party-protection
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer (England)1854

Hadley v. Baxendale

(1854) 9 Exch 341; 156 English Reports 145

Damages for breach of contract are limited to those: (1) arising naturally from the breach in the usual course of things (first limb), or (2) those which were in the reasonable contemplation of both parties at the time of contracting as the probable result of breach (second limb, special damages requiring notice).

damagesremotenesscontemplationtwo-limbsconsequential-lossforeseeabilitySection-73
Read case brief
Court of Chancery (Rolls Court)1853

Bentley v Craven

(1853) 18 Beavan 75; 52 English Reports 29

A partner who sells his own goods to the firm at a profit without disclosing that he is the seller must account to the firm for that profit. A partner cannot make a secret gain out of a dealing with his own firm.

partnershipsection-16secret-profitduty-to-accountself-dealinggood-faith
Read case brief
Court of Queen's Bench (England)1853

Hochster v. De La Tour

(1853) 2 El & Bl 678; 118 English Reports 922

Where a party to an executory contract repudiates it before the date of performance, the innocent party may sue immediately for anticipatory breach without waiting for the date of performance to arrive.

anticipatory-breachrepudiationexecutory-contractimmediate-actionSection-39
Read case brief
House of Lords1848

Foley v Hill

(1848) 2 House of Lords Cases 28

Money deposited with a banker becomes the banker's property; the relationship is debtor-creditor, not trustee-beneficiary

debtor-creditorbanker-customerdepositsownershipfoundational
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas1848

Smart v Sandars

(1848) 5 Common Bench 895; 136 English Reports 1132

An agency is coupled with an interest only where the authority was conferred for the purpose of securing that interest. An interest acquired after the authority was given does not make the authority irrevocable.

agencyterminationrevocationsection-202agency-coupled-with-interestfactors
Read case brief
Court of Chancery (England)1848

Tulk v Moxhay

(1848) 2 Ph 774

Restrictive covenant binds subsequent purchaser with notice, even without privity of contract

property-lawcovenantrestrictivenoticeequitysection-40
Read case brief
Queen's Bench (England)1845

Bird v. Jones

(1845) 7 Queen's Bench 742

False imprisonment requires total restraint within a bounded area; a partial obstruction leaving a genuine alternative means of movement does not satisfy this requirement.

false-imprisonmenttotal-restraintpersonal-liberty
Read case brief
House of Lords1844

R v O'Connell

(1844) 5 St Tr (NS) 1

An advocate is duty-bound to present the client's case fearlessly regardless of personal opinion about guilt; the cab-rank rule principle.

professional-ethicscab-rank-ruleduty-to-courtfearless-advocacy
Read case brief
House of Lords1844

Sussex Peerage Case

(1844) 11 Cl & Fin 85; 8 English Reports 1034

Literal Rule: clear and unambiguous words must be given their plain grammatical meaning regardless of consequences.

literal-ruleplain-meaningroyal-marriages-actclear-words
Read case brief
Court of Chancery1843

Foss v Harbottle

(1843) 2 Hare 461

The proper plaintiff for wrongs done to a company is the company itself (acting through its majority); individual members cannot sue for corporate wrongs

majority-ruleproper-plaintiffcorporate-wrongsminority-rightsfoundational
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer (England)1841

Fouldes v. Willoughby

(1841) 8 M&W 540

Conversion requires a genuine denial of, or serious exclusion from, the owner's rights; mere interference with one specific mode of dealing, leaving underlying ownership and recovery intact, does not suffice.

conversiontrespass-to-goodsmovable-property
Read case brief
Court of Chancery (Rolls Court)1840

Hyde v. Wrench

(1840) 3 Beav 334; 49 English Reports 132

A counter-offer terminates (destroys) the original offer; the original offer cannot thereafter be accepted.

counter-offeroriginal-offertermination-of-offeracceptancemirror-image-rule
Read case brief
Court of Crown Cases (England)1840

R v. St George

(1840) 9 C&P 483

Creating a reasonable apprehension of imminent harm through pointing a loaded firearm at another constitutes assault, even without the threatened force actually being carried out.

assaultapprehensionimminence
Read case brief
Court of Queen's Bench1840

Trueman v Loder

(1840) 11 Ad and El 589; 113 English Reports 539

Termination of an agent's authority does not take effect against third persons until it becomes known to them. A principal remains bound to those who continue to deal with the former agent in ignorance of the revocation.

agencyterminationrevocationsection-208notice-to-third-partiesapparent-authority
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer (England)1837

Pickard v. Sears

(1837) 6 Ad & El 469

Where a person by words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe in a certain state of things and induces him to act on that belief to alter his position, the former is estopped from denying that state of things.

evidence-lawestoppelestoppel-by-conductenglish-law
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer1836

Becke v. Smith

(1836) 2 M & W 195

The preamble of a statute is a key to open the mind of the Legislature and the mischiefs it intended to redress. Where the enacting words are ambiguous, the preamble may be used to ascertain the purpose and scope of the Act.

preambleinternal-aidslegislative-intentambiguitymischief
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas (England)1831

Planché v. Colburn

(1831) 8 Bing 14; 131 English Reports 305

Where one party has partially performed a contract which is then wrongfully terminated by the other party, the performer may claim quantum meruit for the work done, abandoning the contractual rate and claiming reasonable value instead.

quantum-meruitpartial-performancewrongful-terminationbreachreasonable-remuneration
Read case brief
King's Bench (England)1830

Marzetti v. Williams

(1830) 1 B & Ad 415

Wrongful dishonour of a trader's cheque carries presumption of substantial damages without proof of actual loss

wrongful-dishonourdamagestraderpaying-bankerpresumption
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas (England)1828

Bird v. Holbrook

(1828) 4 Bing 628

A plaintiff's own wrongful conduct (trespass) does not automatically excuse a defendant's independently excessive, disproportionate response, such as a concealed spring gun without warning.

plaintiff-the-wrongdoertrespassexcessive-responsespring-gun
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas1827

Adamson v Jarvis

(1827) 4 Bing 66; 130 English Reports 693

A person who acts at the request of another in a transaction which turns out to be wrongful, in good faith and without knowledge of the wrong, is entitled to be indemnified by the person who requested the act.

indemnityagencyimplied-indemnitysection-222section-223good-faith
Read case brief
Court of King's Bench1825

Bloxam v Sanders

(1825) 4 Barnewall and Cresswell 941; 107 English Reports 1309

The passing of property does not carry with it a right to immediate possession. Where the price is unpaid and no credit has been given, the seller may retain the goods until payment or tender, and the buyer cannot sue for them though he is the owner.

sale-of-goodssection-46section-47unpaid-sellerlienpossessionpassing-of-property
Read case brief
Court of King's Bench (England)1818

Adams v. Lindsell

(1818) 1 B & Ald 681

A contract is complete the moment a letter of acceptance is posted, not when it is received (the postal rule).

postal-rulecommunication-of-acceptanceoffer-and-acceptance
Read case brief
Court of King's Bench (England)1809

Butterfield v. Forrester

(1809) 11 East 60

Contributory negligence by the plaintiff operated as a complete bar to recovery, regardless of the relative degree of fault.

contributory-negligenceall-or-nothing-rulehistorical
Read case brief
Court of Chancery (England)1803

Aldrich v Cooper

(1803) 8 Ves 382

Marshalling: where senior creditor has two funds and junior creditor has one, senior must be directed to the fund junior cannot reach

property-lawmarshallingequitytwo-fundssection-81
Read case brief
Court of King's Bench (England)1795

Cutter v Powell

(1795) 6 TR 320; 101 English Reports 573

Where a contract is entire (indivisible), no payment is due for partial performance unless the entire obligation has been completed.

entire-contractquantum-meruitsubstantial-performancedischarge-by-performance
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas (England)1765

Entick v. Carrington

(1765) 19 St Tr 1029

Even state officials require positive legal authority to justify entering private property; unauthorised entry, regardless of claimed governmental purpose, constitutes trespass absent genuine lawful justification.

trespass-to-landexecutive-powerconstitutional-limits
Read case brief
Court of King's Bench1764

Triquet v Bath

(1764) 3 Burr 1478

Customary international law is part of the common law of England and is directly enforceable in domestic courts without the need for specific legislation (incorporation doctrine/Blackstone's doctrine).

PILincorporationBlackstonediplomatic-immunitycommon-law
Read case brief
Court of King's Bench (UK)1760

Moses v. Macferlan

(1760) 2 Burr 1005

Quasi-contractual obligation arises to prevent unjust enrichment; the law implies a promise to return money received without consideration or unjustly.

quasi-contractunjust-enrichmentobligationimplied-promise
Read case brief
Court of Chancery (England)1756

Tomlinson v. Gill

(1756) Amb 330

Depositors are unsecured creditors in bank liquidation; they rank pari passu with other unsecured creditors

banker-customerdebtor-creditorinsolvencydepositor-statuspari-passu
Read case brief
Court of Chancery1742

Charitable Corporation v Sutton

(1742) 2 Atk 400

Directors are in the nature of trustees for the company; they are liable for breach of trust if they misapply or negligently handle corporate property

directorstrusteesfiduciary-dutybreach-of-trusthistorical
Read case brief
Court of King's Bench (England)1722

Armory v. Delamirie

(1722) 1 Str 505

A finder or lawful temporary possessor holds a superior possessory right against all but the true owner, and wrongful refusal to return or account for goods held is actionable.

conversionfinder-rightspossessiondetinue
Read case brief
Court of King's Bench1704

Birkmyr v Darnell

(1704) 1 Salk 27; 91 English Reports 27

A guarantee is collateral: the third party remains liable and the promisor's liability is secondary. Where the promisor assumes primary liability so that the third party is not liable at all, the promise is an original undertaking and not a guarantee.

guaranteeindemnitysection-126collateral-promiseoriginal-promise
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas (England)1704

Cole v. Turner

(1704) 6 Mod Rep 149

The least touching of another, without lawful justification or consent, constitutes battery, regardless of the degree of force or presence of actual injury.

batterybodily-integrityunwanted-contact
Read case brief
House of Lords (UK)1703

Ashby v. White

(1703) 2 Ld Raym 938

Ubi jus ibi remedium: where there is a right, there must be a remedy for its violation, even without proof of actual pecuniary damage.

ubi-jus-ibi-remediumright-and-remedyequitynatural-justiceinjuria-sine-damno
Read case brief
Court of King's Bench1612

Sutton's Hospital Case

(1612) 10 Co Rep 1a; 77 English Reports 960

A corporation is an invisible, immortal, and artificial person created by charter, possessing legal personality distinct from its members

corporate-personalitycharterincorporationhistorical
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas (England)1602

Pinnel's Case

(1602) 5 Co Rep 117a; 77 English Reports 237

Payment of a lesser sum on the day it is due cannot be satisfaction for a greater sum; but payment of a lesser sum before the day, or at a different place, or with a chattel (horse, hawk, robe) may discharge the whole.

part-paymentconsiderationdebtaccord-and-satisfactionEnglish-lawhistorical
Read case brief
Court of Exchequer (England)1584

Heydon's Case

(1584) 76 English Reports 637

The Mischief Rule requires courts to consider what defect the statute was enacted to remedy, and interpret the statute to suppress that mischief and advance the remedy

mischief-rulepurposive-interpretationfour-questionsstatutory-interpretation
Read case brief
Court of Common Pleas (England)1410

Gloucester Grammar School Case

(1410) YB 11 Hen IV, f. 47, pl. 21

Damage resulting from lawful competition, absent violation of any legal right, is damnum sine injuria and not actionable.

damnum-sine-injuriacompetitionelements-of-tort
Read case brief
Supreme Court of India0

Kedar Lal v. Hari Lal

Standard CPC authority

Pleadings must contain facts, not law. The court draws legal inferences from pleaded facts. Parties plead material facts; the court applies the law.

CPCpleadingsmaterial-factsfacts-not-laworder-VIcourt-applies-law
Read case brief