Reviewed case brief

Robert D'Souza v Executive Engineer, Southern Railway (cited in labour law casebooks alongside Tata Iron and Steel disciplinary matters)

AIR 1968 SC 843

AIR 1968 SC 843 · Supreme Court of India

reinstatementback-wagesdiscretion-of-tribunalillegal-termination
Court
Supreme Court of India
Year
1968
Subjects
Labour Law
Reviewed
2026-08-02

Rule established

Where an employee is dismissed without a proper inquiry, and reinstatement is directed, the question of back wages for the intervening period is a matter of discretion for the tribunal, to be exercised having regard to the circumstances, including whether the workman was gainfully employed elsewhere during the period, and is not an automatic entitlement flowing mechanically from a finding of illegal termination.

Facts

    Issues

      Held

        Ratio decidendi

        How to use it in an exam

        Editorial source

        AIR 1968 SC 843; standard casebook authority on the discretionary nature of back wages upon reinstatement, cross-verify citation and exact party names before exam use

        Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.