Reviewed case brief

Re Kingston Cotton Mill Co (No 2)

[1896] 2 Ch 279

The Court of Appeal established the classic formulation of the auditor's standard of care. Lopes LJ held that an auditor is a watchdog, not a bloodhound — he is not required to approach his work with suspicion or to assume dishonesty unless circumstances specifically warrant it. He is entitled to r

auditorwatchdogbloodhoundduty-of-caresuspicionstandard-of-skill
Court
Court of Appeal
Year
1896
Subjects
Company Law
Reviewed
2026-06-30

Rule established

An auditor is a watchdog, not a bloodhound; he is not bound to approach his work with suspicion or to be a detective unless the circumstances are such as to arouse suspicion.

Facts

    Issues

      Held

        Ratio decidendi

        How to use it in an exam

        Editorial source

        [1896] 2 Ch 279

        Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.