Bhashyam v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Rule established
Hundis are negotiable instruments by usage of trade under S.13(2); they need not conform exactly to S.5 formalities
Facts
- A question arose regarding the tax treatment of income from hundis
- The classification depended on whether hundis are "negotiable instruments"
- The taxpayer contended hundis are negotiable by custom
Issue
- Whether a hundi qualifies as a negotiable instrument under S.13 of the NI Act.
Held
- Hundis are negotiable instruments by usage of trade under S.13(2). They possess the essential characteristic of negotiability (free transferability with holder in due course rights) even though their form may differ from the statutory instruments in S.13(1). S.13(2) accommodates instruments deemed negotiable by custom.
Ratio Decidendi
S.13(2) extends negotiability to instruments recognised by trade usage. Hundis qualify as deemed negotiable instruments regardless of formal differences from S.4/S.5 instruments.
How to use it in an exam
Use for "deemed negotiable instruments" questions. Key line: "Hundis are NIs by usage under S.13(2); formality of S.5 not mandatory for custom-based negotiability."
Source
Source: AIR Madras
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.
Cited in study notes
Negotiable Instruments Concept and FeaturesDeemed negotiable instruments