Reviewed case brief

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Kanpur Tanneries Case)

AIR 1988 SC 1037 (within the broader Ganga Pollution litigation)

AIR 1988 SC 1037 (within the broader Ganga Pollution litigation) · Supreme Court of India

river-pollutionclosure-ordertanneriesganga
Court
Supreme Court of India
Year
1988
Subjects
Environmental Law
Reviewed
2026-08-02

Rule established

Closure is an appropriate, and sometimes necessary, remedy for non-compliance with orders to install effluent treatment, given the insufficiency of financial penalties alone in some circumstances.

Facts

    Issues

      Held

        Ratio decidendi

        How to use it in an exam

        Editorial source

        AIR 1988 SC 1037

        Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.