Reviewed case brief

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Ganga Pollution Case)

AIR 1988 SC 1037

AIR 1988 SC 1037 · Supreme Court of India

environmental-lawcontinuing-mandamusriver-pollutionarticle-21ganga
Court
Supreme Court of India
Year
1988
Subjects
Environmental Law, Constitutional Law I
Reviewed
2026-08-02

Rule established

Courts can retain continuing jurisdiction (continuing mandamus) over environmental matters requiring sustained monitoring and successive orders, rather than a single conclusive judgment.

Facts

    Issues

      Held

        Ratio decidendi

        How to use it in an exam

        Editorial source

        AIR 1988 SC 1037

        Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.