Reviewed case brief

Govind Pillai v Aiyappan

AIR 1937 Mad 228

Substantial compliance with the spirit and intent of a condition precedent is sufficient. Exact literal performance is not required.

property-lawcondition-precedentsubstantial-compliancesection-25
Court
Madras High Court
Year
1937
Subjects
Property Law
Reviewed
2026-06-30

Rule established

Substantial compliance with a condition precedent suffices; exact literal performance not required

Facts

    Issues

      Held

        Ratio decidendi

        How to use it in an exam

        Editorial source

        AIR 1937 Mad 228

        Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.