Reviewed case brief

Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd. v. Corporation of Calcutta

AIR 1953 Cal 549

## Summary

punctuationinternal-aidsminor-aidstatutory-constructiondraftsman-error
Court
Calcutta High Court
Year
1953
Subjects
Interpretation of Statutes
Reviewed
2026-06-28

Rule established

Punctuation is not a controlling factor in statutory interpretation but may be looked at as a minor aid where the meaning is otherwise doubtful. The court gives effect to the sense of the provision rather than mechanical reliance on punctuation marks, which may have been carelessly used by the draftsman.

Facts

    Issues

      Held

        Ratio decidendi

        How to use it in an exam

        Editorial source

        AIR 1953 Cal 549

        Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.