Reviewed case brief

Management of Kairbetta Estate v Rajamanickam

AIR 1960 SC 893

AIR 1960 SC 893 · Supreme Court of India

lockoutsection-2-lemployer-counterpart-to-strikebona-fide
Court
Supreme Court of India
Year
1960
Subjects
Labour Law
Reviewed
2026-08-02

Rule established

A 'lockout' under Section 2(l) of the Industrial Disputes Act is the employer's counterpart to a strike by workmen, namely the closing of a place of employment, suspension of work, or refusal to continue employing workers, undertaken to compel the workers to accept the employer's terms; a lockout that is not a genuine response to an industrial dispute, or is punitive/retaliatory rather than a bona fide part of collective bargaining pressure, may be treated as illegal.

Facts

    Issues

      Held

        Ratio decidendi

        How to use it in an exam

        Editorial source

        AIR 1960 SC 893; foundational authority defining lockout and its relationship to strikes, cross-verify citation before exam use

        Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.