Reviewed case brief

State of Gujarat v. Shyamlal Mohanlal

AIR 1965 SC 1251

The decision establishing that India does not follow the American exclusionary rule — illegally obtained evidence is admissible if relevant.

search-seizureadmissibilityexclusionary-ruleillegal-searchevidencesem-5
Court
Supreme Court of India
Year
1965
Subjects
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
Reviewed
2026-06-29

Rule established

Indian law does not follow the exclusionary rule. Evidence obtained through illegal search is admissible if relevant. The mode of procurement does not affect admissibility.

Facts

    Issues

      Held

        Ratio decidendi

        How to use it in an exam

        Editorial source

        AIR

        Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.