Reviewed case brief

Kashinathsa Yamosa Kabadi v. Narsingsa Bhaskarsa Kabadi

AIR 1961 SC 1077

## Summary

CPCreceiverorder-XLdrastic-remedysparingly-exerciseddisputed-property
Court
Supreme Court of India
Year
1961
Subjects
Civil Procedure Code and Law of Limitation
Reviewed
2026-06-29

Rule established

Appointment of a receiver is a drastic remedy and must be exercised sparingly. A receiver should not be appointed merely because the property is disputed; there must be danger of loss or dissipation requiring protective intervention.

Facts

    Issues

      Held

        Ratio decidendi

        How to use it in an exam

        Editorial source

        AIR 1961 SC 1077; verified via standard CPC references

        Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.