Reviewed case brief
Secretary of State v. Bombay Corporation
AIR 1924 Bom 489
## Summary
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Year
- 1924
- Subjects
- Property Law
- Reviewed
- 2026-06-30
Rule established
Mere verbal protest without physical obstruction does not constitute 'interruption' sufficient to break the prescriptive period under S.15
Facts
Issues
Held
Ratio decidendi
How to use it in an exam
Editorial source
Mulla, Indian Easements Act
Educational summary only. Read the reported judgment or an authorised law report before relying on the case professionally.