Aghnoo Nagesia v State of Bihar
AIR 1966 SC 119; 1966 SCR (1) 13419651 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- The accused went to the police station and lodged an FIR in which he gave a full account of how he had killed several persons, and of where the weapon and the bodies could be found. He was convicted of murder largely on the basis of this statement.
- Issue
- Whether a confessional FIR lodged by the accused is admissible, wholly or in part.
- Held
- A confession to a police officer is barred by S.25 of the Evidence Act, and an FIR by the accused that contains a confession is a confession. The ban covers every admission in it about the offence, including motive, preparation, opportunity and later conduct, and the statement cannot be split to admit the non-confessional parts. Only the fact that the accused gave the information, and the portion that leads to the discovery of a fact under S.27, can be proved. The conviction was set aside.
- Principle
- A confessional FIR by the accused is wholly inadmissible except for the discovery portion (now S.23 BSA).
Facts
- The accused went to the police station and lodged an FIR in which he gave a full account of how he had killed several persons, and of where the weapon and the bodies could be found. He was convicted of murder largely on the basis of this statement.
Issue
- Whether a confessional FIR lodged by the accused is admissible, wholly or in part.
Held
- A confession to a police officer is barred by S.25 of the Evidence Act, and an FIR by the accused that contains a confession is a confession. The ban covers every admission in it about the offence, including motive, preparation, opportunity and later conduct, and the statement cannot be split to admit the non-confessional parts. Only the fact that the accused gave the information, and the portion that leads to the discovery of a fact under S.27, can be proved. The conviction was set aside.
Cite this
Citation
Aghnoo Nagesia v State of Bihar AIR 1966 SC 119; 1966 SCR (1) 134Reported: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/924340/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.