The First Information Report (FIR) is the document that sets the criminal law machinery in motion. Under S.173 BNSS, when information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence is given to a police officer, it must be recorded and registered. The FIR is not substantive evidence but a crucial document for corroboration and determining the sequence of events.
Legal Framework
| Provision | Subject |
|---|---|
| S.173 BNSS (formerly S.154 CrPC) | Information in cognizable cases (FIR) |
| S.174 BNSS (formerly S.154 CrPC) | Information given by electronic communication |
| S.175 BNSS (formerly S.155 CrPC) | Information as to non-cognizable cases |
| S.193 BNSS (formerly S.173 CrPC) | Police report (charge sheet) after investigation |
Why: The FIR serves multiple purposes: (1) earliest record of the informant's version, (2) triggers investigation, (3) fixes the point of time from which police accountability begins, (4) provides material for corroboration/contradiction at trial.
Requirements of a Valid FIR (S.173)
Essentials:
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Information | Of commission of a cognizable offence |
| Given to | Officer in charge of a police station (or any police station for Zero FIR) |
| Form | Oral, written, or electronic (S.174) |
| Recording | Shall be reduced to writing by the officer |
| Signature | Read over to informant and signed/thumb-impressed |
| Copy | Free copy given to informant immediately |
| Forwarding | Sent to Magistrate forthwith |
| Registration | Entry in the book/register maintained for this purpose |
New Provisions under BNSS:
| Innovation | Detail |
|---|---|
| Zero FIR (S.173(1)) | FIR can be registered at any police station irrespective of jurisdiction |
| E-FIR (S.174) | Information can be given by electronic communication |
| Deemed information | Information by any means (including electronic) triggers duty to register |
| Timeline | Information forwarded to Magistrate within 24 hours |
Zero FIR
Under S.173(1) BNSS, the FIR shall be registered irrespective of the area where the offence is committed. The police station registering the Zero FIR shall transfer it to the police station having jurisdiction within 24 hours.
Why: Victims should not be turned away from police stations on jurisdictional grounds. Immediate registration preserves evidence and triggers timely investigation. Jurisdictional transfer is an internal police matter that should not delay victim relief.
FIR vs. Non-Cognizable Report (NCR)
| Parameter | FIR (S.173) | NCR (S.175) |
|---|---|---|
| For offence type | Cognizable | Non-cognizable |
| Registration | Mandatory | Recorded in separate book |
| Investigation | Automatic (police duty) | Only with Magistrate's order |
| Information to Magistrate | Forwarded forthwith | Complainant referred to Magistrate |
| Effect | Sets criminal machinery in motion | Informational record only |
Evidentiary Value of FIR
| Use | Rule |
|---|---|
| Corroboration | Can corroborate informant's testimony at trial (S.157 BSA) |
| Contradiction | Can contradict informant if testimony differs (S.145 BSA) |
| Substantive evidence | NOT substantive evidence (not made on oath, not cross-examined) |
| Exception | S.27 BSA: if made by accused, may be admissible as admission |
| Dying declaration | If informant subsequently dies, may be admissible under S.32 BSA |
Illustrations
-
At 11 PM, Meera is robbed at knifepoint near a bus stand. She runs to the nearest police station and narrates the incident. The duty officer writes down her statement this becomes the FIR. Later at trial, if Meera says "the robber wore a black jacket" but her FIR says "blue shirt," the defence will use this contradiction to challenge her credibility. That's the FIR's evidentiary role it locks in the first version before memory fades or stories are tailored.
-
A tourist from Delhi is pickpocketed at a railway station in Agra. She panics and approaches the police station near her hotel, which is in a different zone from the railway station. Under the old CrPC, that station might say "not our jurisdiction, go to the railway police." Under S.173(1) BNSS, the hotel-area station must register her FIR (Zero FIR) and then transfer it to the railway police station within 24 hours. The victim's immediate access to the system is guaranteed.
Recall Check
- What is a Zero FIR and which section provides for it?
- Can the FIR be used as substantive evidence at trial?
- What is the duty of police upon receiving information of a cognizable offence?
Key Cases
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP (2014) Lalita-Kumari-v-State-of-UP-2014 Issue: Whether FIR registration is mandatory upon receiving information of a cognizable offence. Rule: S.154 CrPC (now S.173 BNSS): "shall" indicates mandatory registration. Held: FIR registration is mandatory. Preliminary inquiry (max 7 days) permitted only where information does not clearly disclose cognizable offence. Categories where preliminary inquiry may be conducted: matrimonial disputes, commercial offences, medical negligence, corruption.
Tapinder Singh v. State of Punjab (1970) Tapinder-Singh-v-State-of-Punjab-1970 Issue: Whether FIR is substantive evidence. Rule: FIR is not made on oath, not subject to cross-examination; it cannot be substantive evidence. Held: FIR can only be used to corroborate the maker (S.157 Evidence Act) or to contradict the maker (S.145 Evidence Act). It is not substantive evidence of the facts stated therein. Its value is as the earliest version of events.
State of AP v. Punati Ramulu (1993) State-of-AP-v-Punati-Ramulu-1993 Issue: What is the effect of delay in FIR registration? Rule: Delay in FIR does not by itself discredit prosecution; but unexplained delay creates suspicion of fabrication. Held: Delay in filing FIR must be satisfactorily explained. Legitimate reasons include: victim's medical condition, remoteness of location, fear, lack of knowledge of identity of accused. Unexplained inordinate delay throws doubt on the prosecution case.
Distinctions
| Parameter | FIR (S.173) | Complaint (S.2(1)(e)) |
|---|---|---|
| Made to | Police officer | Magistrate |
| For | Cognizable offence | Any offence |
| Effect | Triggers police investigation | Triggers Magistrate's cognizance |
| Form | Written/oral/electronic | Written/oral |
| Registration | Mandatory | No FIR; complaint recorded |
| Investigation | By police suo motu | Magistrate may order inquiry (S.202) |
Flashcards
Q: What is a Zero FIR? A: An FIR registered at any police station regardless of territorial jurisdiction under S.173(1) BNSS; transferred to appropriate station within 24 hours.
Q: Is FIR registration mandatory for cognizable offences? A: Yes. Lalita Kumari: "shall" in S.173 means mandatory; police have no discretion to refuse.
Q: Can FIR be used as substantive evidence? A: No. Per Tapinder Singh, FIR can only corroborate (S.157 BSA) or contradict (S.145 BSA) the maker.
Q: What is the maximum period for preliminary inquiry before FIR per Lalita Kumari? A: 7 days.
Q: What must the police officer give to the informant after recording FIR? A: A free copy of the FIR immediately.
Q: What is the effect of unexplained delay in FIR? A: Per Punati Ramulu, it creates suspicion of fabrication; delay must be satisfactorily explained.
Q: Can FIR be filed electronically under BNSS? A: Yes. S.174 permits information by electronic communication.
Exam Scenario
X is robbed at knifepoint in District A. Injured and in shock, X goes to the nearest police station in District B and reports the incident. The officer at District B refuses to register FIR stating that the incident occurred in District A and X should go there. Advise.
Under S.173(1) BNSS, the FIR shall be registered irrespective of the area where the offence is committed (Zero FIR). The officer at District B is legally bound to register the FIR immediately. After registration, the case file shall be transferred to the police station in District A having territorial jurisdiction within 24 hours. The officer's refusal is illegal and violates S.173. X's remedies: (1) insist on registration citing S.173(1) BNSS, (2) approach the SP of District B, (3) file complaint before Magistrate, (4) approach High Court under Art.226. Per Lalita Kumari, non-registration of FIR where cognizable offence is disclosed is itself actionable. Robbery is a cognizable offence; registration is absolutely mandatory regardless of jurisdiction.