Professional ethicsSeven lampsKarnataka High Court (Division Bench)

Vishwanath Swami v Bar Council of India

W.P. No. 8155 of 2012 (GM-RES-PIL)20131 min read
The case in brief30-second read
Facts
A public interest petition followed a call to boycott courts on 6.3.2012 in Bangalore. The petitioner sought directions to frame rules under S.34 of the Advocates Act in line with Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45.
Issue
Should the High Court frame rules under S.34 on strikes and boycotts, and on costs under S.34(1A)?
Held
The Court referred to Parry's Seven Lamps: "of honesty, of courage, of industry, of wit, of eloquence, of Judgment and of Fellowship", and added the eighth lamp, "Lamp of commitment to justice" (para 24).
Principle
Directions to frame rules under S.34 of the Advocates Act in line with Harish Uppal (strikes and boycotts) and S.34(1A) (costs); the Court listed Parry's Seven Lamps and added an eighth, commitment to justice.
Cite this

Facts

  • A public interest petition followed a call to boycott courts on 6.3.2012 in Bangalore.
  • The petitioner sought directions to frame rules under S.34 of the Advocates Act in line with Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45.

Issue

  1. Should the High Court frame rules under S.34 on strikes and boycotts, and on costs under S.34(1A)?

Held

  • The Court referred to Parry's Seven Lamps: "of honesty, of courage, of industry, of wit, of eloquence, of Judgment and of Fellowship", and added the eighth lamp, "Lamp of commitment to justice" (para 24).
  • The rule-making committee was directed to amend the rules in light of Harish Uppal and to make rules on costs under S.34(1A) (para 32(a)).
  • Bar Associations in Karnataka were directed to implement the BCI resolution of 29/09/2002, including grievance redressal committees, within three months (para 32(b)).

Ratio decidendi

Advocates' duties to the court and the public are enforceable through rules under S.34; strikes and boycotts are inconsistent with them.

Exam use

How to use it in an answer

  • Part A (6 marks): Cite for the Seven Lamps of Advocacy and the eighth lamp.
  • Part B (16 marks): Use in a Seven Lamps answer, and with Harish Uppal on strikes.
  • Key line for exam: "We may add the eighth lamp, that is, 'Lamp of commitment to justice.'" (para 24).

Cite this

Citation

Vishwanath Swami v Bar Council of India W.P. No. 8155 of 2012 (GM-RES-PIL)

Reported: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/146108805/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.