Bar Council of India v Bonnie Foi Law College
2023 INSC 11620231 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- A three-judge bench referred to a Constitution Bench whether the Bar Council of India could prescribe pre-enrolment training or a pre- or post-enrolment examination, and whether V Sudeer v Bar Council of India (1999) 3 SCC 176 needed reconsideration.
- Issue
- Whether the BCI has power under the Advocates Act 1961 to prescribe the All India Bar Examination.
- Held
- S.49 read with S.24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act gives the BCI adequate power to prescribe such norms. V Sudeer does not lay down the correct law. It is for the BCI to decide whether the AIBE is held before or after enrolment.
- Principle
- The Bar Council of India may prescribe the All India Bar Examination as a condition, at the stage it chooses.
Facts
- A three-judge bench referred to a Constitution Bench whether the Bar Council of India could prescribe pre-enrolment training or a pre- or post-enrolment examination, and whether V Sudeer v Bar Council of India (1999) 3 SCC 176 needed reconsideration.
Issue
- Whether the BCI has power under the Advocates Act 1961 to prescribe the All India Bar Examination.
Held
- S.49 read with S.24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act gives the BCI adequate power to prescribe such norms. V Sudeer does not lay down the correct law. It is for the BCI to decide whether the AIBE is held before or after enrolment.
Cite this
Citation
Bar Council of India v Bonnie Foi Law College 2023 INSC 116Reported: https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2008/18749/18749_2008_2_1501_41823_Judgement_10-Feb-2023.pdf ; https://indiankanoon.org/doc/18983454/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.