In re Regina Guha
35 Ind Cas 92519161 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- Miss Regina Guha, a Bachelor of Law of the University of Calcutta (1916), applied for enrolment as a pleader in the District of 24-Parganas and was refused. As the first application by a woman, it was heard by a Special Bench.
- Issue
- Does the Legal Practitioners Act 1879 contemplate women practitioners, and do the High Court's rules exclude them?
- Held
- The rules framed under S.6 of the 1879 Act contemplated the admission of men only, and were not ultra vires.
- Principle
- Under the Legal Practitioners Act 1879 and the High Court's rules as they then stood, a woman could not be enrolled as a pleader; any change was for the Legislature.
Facts
- Miss Regina Guha, a Bachelor of Law of the University of Calcutta (1916), applied for enrolment as a pleader in the District of 24-Parganas and was refused.
- As the first application by a woman, it was heard by a Special Bench.
Issue
- Does the Legal Practitioners Act 1879 contemplate women practitioners, and do the High Court's rules exclude them?
Held
- The rules framed under S.6 of the 1879 Act contemplated the admission of men only, and were not ultra vires.
- "As the law now stands Miss Regina Guha is not entitled to be enrolled as a Pleader of the subordinate Courts" (para 31); any change must be made by the Legislature (para 32).
- The Chief Justice traced the origin of pleaders in Bengal: "The first Regulation dealing with this matter was Regulation VII of 1793" (para 10).
Ratio decidendi
Statutes regulating the profession were read against the circumstances of their time; women's entry required legislation.
Exam use
How to use it in an answer
- Part A (6 marks): Cite for history: Bengal Regulation VII of 1793 made pleading a distinct profession.
- Part B (16 marks): Use in history answers for the pre-Independence period and the later entry of women into the profession by statute.
- Key line for exam: "The first Regulation dealing with this matter was Regulation VII of 1793" (para 10).
Cite this
Citation
In re Regina Guha 35 Ind Cas 925Reported: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1090509/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.