Haryana Waqf Board v Shanti Sarup
(2008) 8 SCC 671; 2008 AIR SCW 650020081 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- The Waqf Board sued for declaration and injunction alleging encroachment. Its application under O.XXVI R.9 for a Local Commissioner was rejected by the trial court; it applied again before the appellate court. The High Court summarily dismissed the second appeal as concluded by concurrent findings of fact.
- Issue
- Whether the High Court should have considered the need for a Local Commissioner to demarcate the land.
- Held
- Since the real controversy was demarcation of land adjacent to the respondents' land, it was appropriate to appoint a Local Commissioner under O.XXVI R.9. The High Court ought to have considered this. The judgment was set aside and the second appeal restored; appeal allowed without costs.
- Principle
- In a dispute about demarcation and encroachment, it is appropriate to appoint a Local Commissioner under O.XXVI R.9
Facts
- The Waqf Board sued for declaration and injunction alleging encroachment. Its application under O.XXVI R.9 for a Local Commissioner was rejected by the trial court; it applied again before the appellate court. The High Court summarily dismissed the second appeal as concluded by concurrent findings of fact.
Issue
- Whether the High Court should have considered the need for a Local Commissioner to demarcate the land.
Held
- Since the real controversy was demarcation of land adjacent to the respondents' land, it was appropriate to appoint a Local Commissioner under O.XXVI R.9. The High Court ought to have considered this. The judgment was set aside and the second appeal restored; appeal allowed without costs.
Ratio decidendi
Where a dispute turns on boundaries or demarcation, the court should consider a local investigation under O.XXVI R.9.
Exam use
How to use it in an answer
Cite for the purpose and use of a local commission.
Cite this
Citation
Haryana Waqf Board v Shanti Sarup (2008) 8 SCC 671; 2008 AIR SCW 6500Reported: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/675295/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.