Subramanian Swamy v Union of India
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 184 of 201420161 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- Petitioners challenged Ss.499 and 500 IPC and S.199 CrPC as an unreasonable restriction on free speech.
- Issue
- Whether criminal defamation is constitutionally valid.
- Held
- Criminal defamation was upheld. Reputation is part of the right to life with dignity under Art.21, and the provisions are a reasonable and proportionate restriction under Art.19(2), not vague.
- Principle
- Criminal defamation is a valid restriction on free speech protecting reputation.
Facts
- Petitioners challenged Ss.499 and 500 IPC and S.199 CrPC as an unreasonable restriction on free speech.
Issue
- Whether criminal defamation is constitutionally valid.
Held
- Criminal defamation was upheld. Reputation is part of the right to life with dignity under Art.21, and the provisions are a reasonable and proportionate restriction under Art.19(2), not vague.
Cite this
Citation
Subramanian Swamy v Union of India Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 184 of 2014Reported: https://api.sci.gov.in/judgment/judis/44579.pdf ; https://indiankanoon.org/doc/80997184/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.