SCG Contracts India Pvt Ltd v K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
AIR 2019 SC 2691; (2019) 12 SCC 21020191 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- In a commercial suit, the trial court by order dated 5 December 2017 allowed the first defendant to file a written statement beyond 120 days from service of summons, and a later order relied on the first order having become final.
- Issue
- Whether a court can allow a written statement in a commercial suit after 120 days.
- Held
- After the amendments by the Commercial Courts Act 2015, the defendant forfeits the right to file after 120 days and the court cannot extend time; the inherent power under S.151 cannot be used to do the opposite of what the rule states. Res judicata does not apply to an erroneous decision on a statutory prohibition. The appeal was allowed and the written statement taken off the record.
- Principle
- In commercial suits, the 120-day limit for filing a written statement is mandatory and cannot be extended under S.151 CPC
Facts
- In a commercial suit, the trial court by order dated 5 December 2017 allowed the first defendant to file a written statement beyond 120 days from service of summons, and a later order relied on the first order having become final.
Issue
- Whether a court can allow a written statement in a commercial suit after 120 days.
Held
- After the amendments by the Commercial Courts Act 2015, the defendant forfeits the right to file after 120 days and the court cannot extend time; the inherent power under S.151 cannot be used to do the opposite of what the rule states. Res judicata does not apply to an erroneous decision on a statutory prohibition. The appeal was allowed and the written statement taken off the record.
Ratio decidendi
The 120-day limit in commercial suits is mandatory.
Exam use
How to use it in an answer
Contrast with Kailash v Nanhku for ordinary suits.
Cite this
Citation
SCG Contracts India Pvt Ltd v K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt Ltd AIR 2019 SC 2691; (2019) 12 SCC 210Reported: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/135625260/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.