Meters and Instruments Private Limited v Kanchan Mehta
(2018) 1 SCC 560; AIR 2017 SC 459420171 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- The appeal arose out of a complaint under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Supreme Court used it to consider how cheque dishonour cases could be disposed of more quickly.
- Issue
- How cheque dishonour cases should be tried, and when the court may close the proceedings if the amount is paid.
- Held
- Offences under S.138 are primarily civil wrongs with a compensatory purpose. Under S.143, such cases are normally to be tried summarily. A Magistrate may try the case as a summons case only where a sentence of imprisonment exceeding one year may be needed or summary trial is otherwise undesirable, after hearing the parties and recording reasons. If the accused pays the cheque amount with interest and costs as assessed, the court may close the proceedings and discharge the accused.
- Principle
- Cheque dishonour cases are normally tried summarily, and conversion to a summons trial needs recorded reasons.
Facts
- The appeal arose out of a complaint under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Supreme Court used it to consider how cheque dishonour cases could be disposed of more quickly.
Issue
- How cheque dishonour cases should be tried, and when the court may close the proceedings if the amount is paid.
Held
- Offences under S.138 are primarily civil wrongs with a compensatory purpose. Under S.143, such cases are normally to be tried summarily. A Magistrate may try the case as a summons case only where a sentence of imprisonment exceeding one year may be needed or summary trial is otherwise undesirable, after hearing the parties and recording reasons. If the accused pays the cheque amount with interest and costs as assessed, the court may close the proceedings and discharge the accused.
Cite this
Citation
Meters and Instruments Private Limited v Kanchan Mehta (2018) 1 SCC 560; AIR 2017 SC 4594Reported: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/160848531/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.