Jashanmal Jhamatmal v Brahmanand Sarupananda
AIR 1944 Sind 1919441 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- The accused, a landlord, shouted at and pointed a pistol at his tenant's wife to frighten her; she collapsed and became seriously ill.
- Issue
- Whether causing a mental shock that leads to illness can be 'hurt'.
- Held
- Temporary mental impairment, hysteria or terror can be an 'infirmity' and so bodily hurt under S.319 IPC.
- Principle
- 'Infirmity' in the definition of hurt covers a temporary disordered state of mind caused by the accused's act.
Facts
- The accused, a landlord, shouted at and pointed a pistol at his tenant's wife to frighten her; she collapsed and became seriously ill.
Issue
- Whether causing a mental shock that leads to illness can be 'hurt'.
Held
- Temporary mental impairment, hysteria or terror can be an 'infirmity' and so bodily hurt under S.319 IPC.
Cite this
Citation
Jashanmal Jhamatmal v Brahmanand Sarupananda AIR 1944 Sind 19Reported: https://ili.ac.in/pdf/pmv.pdf (not found on IK or SCI). This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.